One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Fun Bunch
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since May 2008
23456 posts
 Online 

One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


While we have a few players that are better suited to a 3-4, those guys will likely start. We have 2-3 spots to fill in the staring lineup (NT or DE, OLB, S).

The rest is depth. We need a lot more guys suited for the system, and a lot of the backups just aren't suited for it and will likely be let go or moved. We've got to keep all of our picks in order to build depth, and I think we will spend a lot of time in FA on 3rd and 4th tier 3-4 guys in order to build it.

To me, that's going to be one of the biggest tasks in changing the defensive philosophy: depth and competent backups the suit the system.







Back to top
Share:
Brettesaurus Rex
New Orleans Saints Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
21961 posts
 Online 

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


I know I'm the minority, but I see NT as taken care of. I don't see why Bunkley an Hicks couldn't be your two deep there.

Rush OLB is top priority IMO.

I agree with DE Bc Jordan is your best fit...don't really know well Smith will do there. We still have McBride but that's also an unknown.

S is def last on the list. Would be nice to upgrade there but with this new switch, I will be very highly disappointed if we use even our 3rd rounder but only 2nd pick on a S



This post was edited on 1/25 at 11:47 am


Back to top
Patrick O Rly
New Orleans Saints Fan
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
37031 posts
 Online 

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


We're definitely gonna have to get creative. I'd imagine we'll be super active (as usual) in udfa.





Back to top
BarbeTiger
New Orleans Saints Fan
Mr. White's Lab Yo
Member since Jan 2012
5089 posts

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


Depth will come with time





Back to top
Fun Bunch
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since May 2008
23456 posts
 Online 

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


quote:

We're definitely gonna have to get creative. I'd imagine we'll be super active (as usual) in udfa.



Agree. When you run the 4-3 for years, you have years to acquire depth.

When you switch like this, you have to either acquire all of your depth or plug guys into roles that they might not fit super well.






Back to top
Sophandros
Tulane Fan
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45154 posts

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


Rush OLB is Galette, Wilson, and Cassilias, maybe. So adding someone else there would be a good upgrade.

Also may want to look at another ILB.






Back to top
Fun Bunch
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since May 2008
23456 posts
 Online 

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


quote:

Depth will come with time


We've got one offseason.






Back to top
EarthwormJim
LSU Fan
Member since Dec 2005
9745 posts

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


quote:

Also may want to look at another ILB.


+1

I wouldn't mind taking a guy like Ogletree from UGA in the first.






Back to top
Fun Bunch
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since May 2008
23456 posts
 Online 

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


I see Hawthorne and Lofton as locks for ILB. So obviously, you need two backups. I don't know if we have those guys on the roster.

Martez played ILB in Illinois' 3-4, FYI.






Back to top
Tiger Nation 84
LSU Fan
Member since Dec 2011
13880 posts

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


I wouldn't mind seeing us take Minter first round!





Back to top
L.A.
New Orleans Saints Fan
Los Angeles
Member since Aug 2003
37415 posts

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


quote:

I don't see why Bunkley an Hicks couldn't be your two deep there.
Hicks seems awfully tall for a NT. Are there any other 6'5 NT's in the league?

Seems like he'd be a possible fit at DE in the 3-4.






Back to top
afatgreekcat
New Orleans Saints Fan
Atlanta, GA
Member since Jan 2013
2828 posts

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


quote:

I wouldn't mind seeing us take Minter first round!


:inb4lsuhomer:

But for serious, I think 15th would be reaching for Minter unless he dominates at the combine. I would be ok with trading down to the bottom of the round if it meant taking Minter, or if we get our 2nd rounder, I would love to take him there.



This post was edited on 1/25 at 12:08 pm


Back to top
Fun Bunch
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since May 2008
23456 posts
 Online 

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


quote:

Hicks seems awfully tall for a NT. Are there any other 6'5 NT's in the league?

Seems like he'd be a possible fit at DE in the 3-4.




I see him as playing DE most of the time and playing NT on obvious passing downs.

He is a bit tall, and has long arms. Guy is huge and has great athleticism for his size...given that combo I think he could be a superb DE opposite Cam.






Back to top
41bengal
LSU Fan
Da' Ville
Member since Jun 2009
1593 posts

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


we have some players that will fit in better to a 3-4. Smith is great a holding his ground. He just doesn't get much pressure on a qb, that is what the d-ends in a 34 are asked to do. Yes it's nice to have a NT like nagata are wilfolk but they don't fallout of trees. We have guys like hicks and bunkley that can be like ratliff in dallas hell they are bigger than ratliff. We just need to bring in a stud olb/de to bring that pass rush.





Back to top
TigerJeff
LSU Fan
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
9188 posts

re: One of the biggest issues with a switch to 3-4: Depth


On the current roster, in my humble opinion, and I've said this for two years, the most athletic defensive player is Martez Wilson. He needs to be on the field, in some capacity. Period.





Back to top


Back to top




//