- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: next yrs. running game could be lethal
Posted on 1/20/13 at 6:56 am to mpwilging
Posted on 1/20/13 at 6:56 am to mpwilging
quote:
ALL the great running backs get stronger as the game goes on and their carries pile up. This is just a historical fact...
It's a fact that you're an idiot for believing this nonsense
The only thing that's a fact is that defenses get tired as the game goes on
0
Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:01 am to mpwilging
quote:
If this is true, then we have a problem in conditioning. ALL the great running backs get stronger as the game goes on and their carries pile up. This is just a historical fact...
I hope you are not being serious.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:06 am to coldhotwings
ill begin to get optimistic if we fire studrawa
Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:23 am to MastrShake
quote:
ill begin to get optimistic if we fire studrawa
Well it looks like he is sticking around for the 2013 season so you could either mope around for another season or you could find some sort of silver lining and get behind the team. I find much more satisfaction doing the latter.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:28 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:
pretty sure the answer is 0 57 yard run for a td and we dont hear from him again. brilliant coaching
You guys are soooo stupid! Several reasons why Zhill got no touches.
1) Clemson made adjustments on defense that shut down the running game. Our coaches wisely decided to throw the ball.
2) Normal rotation to keep fresh legs in the game. Hill is definitely our best back, but the difference between Hill and Hilliard/Ware is very little, and is unlikely to materially affect the game.
3) The defense (worn out) allowed Clemson to keep the ball and eat up the clock. Our entire offense had limited plays.
Idiot fans don't want to admit this because they'd rather blame a coach and keep their vicarious dreams largely intact, but we lost to Clemson because our team was highly unmotivated and played with very sporadic effort.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:31 am to lsuallen
It will be if we stop running up the middle against 9 in the box
Posted on 1/20/13 at 8:13 am to lsuallen
I would agree almost as stacked as we were with Cecil Faulk and mealey
Posted on 1/20/13 at 9:01 am to Sho Nuff
quote:
How fricking sad that we all know this? If Less let Hill run 20 times a game, the kid could be a Heisman contender. Not that I give a shite about that award, but Hill is a stud and could be unreal if unleashed. How many carries did Hill have in the 4th quarter against Clemson
it is coaching decisions exactly like the brilliant "running back by committee", and benching your best back for practically an entire half that will be the reason fournette will NOT come to lsu. he will be at hated fricking alabama getting 30 touches a game,and winning the heisman trophy.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 9:07 am to cheeser
Pen Rod could also be called a nimrod! 
Posted on 1/20/13 at 9:19 am to cajunjj
Pen rod we had we had 1 yard of O in the 4th quarter! Tulane would have done better! We need to fire Miles and hire an offensive type coach who will keep Chavis.
The winning has been strictly because of Chavis. Miles runs the O and it has been very bad for years!
The winning has been strictly because of Chavis. Miles runs the O and it has been very bad for years!
Posted on 1/20/13 at 9:23 am to lsuallen
If we can't pass the ball, the running game will be irrelavent.
Posted on 1/20/13 at 11:49 am to damnstrongfan
WE MIGHT EVEN SEE 11 IN THE BOX FOR THAT "LETHAL" RUNNING GAME.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:07 am to coldhotwings
quote:
No. If you watched closely, you can see Hill was getting worn out late in the season. That tends to happen when teams constantly stack the box against our run game. Last season, Ware was effective for maybe the first 4 or 5 games before he got a flat tire. Then came Hilliard. Hilliard became the man this past season after Blue went down and then he became ineffective because of wear and tear. Until our passing game gets more respect, it is best to rotate the RB's to keep the starter near full strength for the entire season.
Sorry coldwings, that just isn't completely accurate. You make it sound like there are no RB's out there who can handle getting carries throughout a game when the D focuses in on them. That is conditioning if you're saying 3 of the LSU RB's can't handle the box being stacked.
I mean seriously dude, you're making excuses. I am ALL about mixing in great RB's like Blue and Hilliard, but Miles needs to let 1 guy be the man for multiple games in a row. If he gets too "tired" as you say, then he needs to work harder. And Hill could be a superstar.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:14 am to Penrod
quote:
1) Clemson made adjustments on defense that shut down the running game. Our coaches wisely decided to throw the ball.
And you call others stupid? The coach, not plural, decided to throw the ball and LSU lost because of it. Instead of burning the Clemson
quote:TO's, they laughed at the stupidity and drove the ball right down the tired D's throats.
2) Normal rotation to keep fresh legs in the game.
Hill had 0, as in ZERO carries in the 4th quarter. His legs were as fresh as if they just started the game! Do you guys ever get tired of making excuses for the buffoon on the sidelines?
quote:
3) The defense (worn out) allowed Clemson to keep the ball and eat up the clock. Our entire offense had limited plays.
Now we're getting somewhere. WHY did/does the offense have limited plays? I do not blame the D. They were there for 100 plays. They finally broke. The pathetic offense which is determined by pathetic coaching let the Tigers down.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 8:34 am to gotygers
quote:
We need to fire Miles and hire an offensive type coach who will keep Chavis.
Please stop, we aren't firing miles anytime soon. Might as well accept that fact.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 8:46 am to lsuallen
quote:
Message Posted by lsuallen This running attack next year could be the best ever!
That's fine, but the burning question remains: was the 2012 backfield the BEST OF ALL TIME???
Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:03 am to Penrod
quote:
Idiot fans don't want to admit this because they'd rather blame a coach and keep their vicarious dreams largely intact, but we lost to Clemson because our team was highly unmotivated and played with very sporadic effort.
And you wouldn't hold a coach or coaching staff accountable for any of your own assessment ?
Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:11 am to johnrocker
quote:
the best back NEVER gets all the touches in the 2nd half....FACT
If Blue and Hill stay healthy, I like who will be coming off the sidelines.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:14 am to lsuallen
quote:
"next yrs...."
This makes me think I'm on a Notre Dame board.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:17 am to johnrocker
Only if Les wakes up & notices that Hill is a beast & run him & Blue second. I want hold my breath!
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News