- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bounty hearing coming down today
Posted on 12/11/12 at 8:37 am
Posted on 12/11/12 at 8:37 am
“@AdamSchefter: Former NFL commish Paul Tagliabue has informed league and players' attorneys his decision on Saints' bounty appeal hearings will come today.”
Posted on 12/11/12 at 8:38 am to Byron Bojangles III
Everything will stand, he won't frick over his boy
Posted on 12/11/12 at 8:40 am to geauxtigers87
quote:
Everything will stand, he won't frick over his boy
Probably... but let's hope for justice!
Posted on 12/11/12 at 8:40 am to geauxtigers87
quote:
Everything will stand, he won't frick over his boy
Posted on 12/11/12 at 8:44 am to Breesus
What boundaries does judge Berrigan have in this case after the ruling is handed down?
Posted on 12/11/12 at 8:44 am to geauxtigers87
quote:
Everything will stand, he won't frick over his boy
I agree with this but hope it is not true.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:04 am to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
What boundaries does judge Berrigan have in this case after the ruling is handed down?
My amateur mind believes it sounds like she is waiting for the NFL appeals process to make things right and if the don't, she will then step in a do it. I am likely wrong though.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:05 am to Byron Bojangles III
Great question. I'd like to know this as well.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:06 am to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
What boundaries does judge Berrigan have in this case after the ruling is handed down?
Originally she was going to step in because Goodell ruling on onfield conduct was a clear violation of the CBA. IIRC they were attempting to reissue the same penalty with language that would make it legal under the CBA when the kitchen got too hot and Tags tagged in.
The union objected to Tags ruling on this because he's also representing Goodell in Vilma's defamation suit which is a conflict of interest. Basically if he gives a significantly different ruling than Goodell he makes his client vulnerable in a pending lawsuit. I'm no lawyer but that sounds like a pretty significant conflict of interest that Judge Berrigan might object to.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:55 am to TigerinATL
quote:this is why i don't think the ruling will be much different...
Basically if he gives a significantly different ruling than Goodell he makes his client vulnerable in a pending lawsuit.
quote:i agree with this too
I'm no lawyer but that sounds like a pretty significant conflict of interest that Judge Berrigan might object to.
Posted on 12/11/12 at 9:59 am to geauxtigers87
quote:
Everything will stand, he won't frick over his boy
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News