Started By
Message
locked post

Scrimmage stats are inflated......

Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:22 pm
Posted by tdavi48
NA
Member since Mar 2012
606 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:22 pm
There were 150 snaps taken, which is twice as much as a usual game. So most of these stats are inflated due to the high volume of snaps. The good news is he hit for big yardage and had a high completion percentage. And the running backs had good yards per carry.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58103 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:23 pm to
Damn. You ruined my night. I was fired the fck up about those scrimmage numbers!!!
Posted by WreckinRams05
Houston, Texas
Member since Dec 2005
6189 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:28 pm to
im gonna be optimistic and say those 150 snaps were split between both 1st and 2nd string offenses
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12170 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:29 pm to
72% = 72%. The numbers aren't inflated. The numbers are what they did in the scrimmage yesterday. Half the time they were in red zone. Of course they ran a bunch of plays. They didn't just score and say, OK let's kickoff. They ran a DIFFERENT play. It's a scrimmage.

Inflated numbers would be if Mett was actually 16 of 36, and Miles said he was 26 of 36.
Posted by BengalBen
Midwest
Member since May 2008
2220 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:31 pm to
You do realize the 2nd and 3rd QBs probably took at least half those snaps?
Posted by Random LSU Hero
2014 NFL Survivor Champion (17-0)
Member since Aug 2011
9433 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

Scrimmage stats are inflated......




Well LADI FREAKIN DA!
Posted by tdavi48
NA
Member since Mar 2012
606 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

72% = 72%. The numbers aren't inflated. The numbers are what they did in the scrimmage yesterday. Half the time they were in red zone. Of course they ran a bunch of plays. They didn't just score and say, OK let's kickoff. They ran a DIFFERENT play. It's a scrimmage.



Exactly why I said, "he still had a high percentage." But most of the touchdowns came when they ran the redzone offense, and if they didnt get a scoring play right Miles made them run it again. I can go ahead and assure you we will not be throwing close to 40 times a game, we wont need too. But I was still giving the players props on their effeciency.
Posted by Lacour
Member since Nov 2009
32949 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:40 pm to
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11651 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:40 pm to
150 snaps shared between 3 QB's= an avg of 50 per QB. 26/36 for 336 is always 26/36 for 336 regardless of how many other snaps were taken. The production is not "inflated". It is EXACTLY the same.
Posted by HeadCoach
Shady's Parking Lot
Member since Mar 2009
5659 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:46 pm to
So you're saying it was scrimmage?
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58103 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

So you're saying it was scrimmage?


Posted by calicrawdaddy
Santa Clarita, CA.
Member since May 2009
374 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

150 snaps shared between 3 QB's= an avg of 50 per QB. 26/36 for 336 is always 26/36 for 336 regardless of how many other snaps were taken. The production is not "inflated". It is EXACTLY the same.


This
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
50092 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 8:58 pm to
I'll just throw a guess out there that I'm not the first one to tell you that you're just eaten up with dumbass...correct?
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22772 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:02 pm to
1's against 2's as well.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
58972 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

150 snaps shared between 3 QB's= an avg of 50 per QB.


You think the 3rd team guy got the same amount of snaps as Mett?


quote:

The production is not "inflated". It is EXACTLY the same.


Perhaps not "inflated," but certainly taken out of context. Since we don't know the context. But you know what he means and are douchetastically playing semantics for some reason.
Posted by rtbtiger
Member since Jan 2009
842 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:13 pm to
stupidity on here is epic
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89831 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

There were 150 snaps taken, which is twice as much as a usual game. So most of these stats are inflated due to the high volume of snaps. The good news is he hit for big yardage and had a high completion percentage. And the running backs had good yards per carry.



Now are you going to tell us that Mike has cancer?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

150 snaps shared between 3 QB's= an avg of 50 per QB.


I would guarantee you Mett got the bulk of the throws
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:14 pm to
JJ and JL couldn't hit 26 - 36 against air.
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127379 posts
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:15 pm to
Thanks for such riveting information.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram