- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can't read twitter - why is this guy saying Steele is bad for LSU???
Posted on 7/10/12 at 9:44 am
Posted on 7/10/12 at 9:44 am
quote:
"TravHaneyESPN Travis Haney Fast-paced offense was bad fit with him. But guy can coach. "@myranwilkes: Would be a "good get" for Steele...not so much for LSU."
10
Posted on 7/10/12 at 9:47 am to The ATL
IDK maybe becuase his defense at Clemson sucked.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 9:47 am to The ATL
Hard to say, but the context is confusing, like they were talking about a certain style offensive guy wouldn't be good, not steele, but its hard to decifer.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 9:47 am to CamdenTiger
he is a hell of a recruiter
Posted on 7/10/12 at 9:49 am to The ATL
I'm assuming because Steele's D gave up 600 yards and 70 points in their last outing has something to do with it. Bad fit on a team that goes fast pace such as Clemson.
This post was edited on 7/10/12 at 9:51 am
Posted on 7/10/12 at 9:51 am to The ATL
I take it as LSU is already very good and that this is a step UP for Steele...not one for LSU.
in other words, it is not BAD for LSU...just that the main benefit is to him.
in other words, it is not BAD for LSU...just that the main benefit is to him.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 9:51 am to The ATL
quote:
ESPN Travis Haney Fast-paced offense was bad fit with him. But guy can coach
Says WVU's offense was not an offense that Clemson was comfortable in defending. Obviously.
quote:
@myranwilkes: Would be a "good get" for Steele...not so much for LSU.
Have no idea.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 9:54 am to The ATL
Are people under the assumption that he would actually be doing more than helping break down film?
People keep throwing out how good a recruiter he is, how terrible his defenses were, how combustible he is. It doesn't matter. He's a glorified grad assistant. He can't recruit off campus, and likely can't recruit on campus. He won't be coaching a position. He won't have final say over anything. He's just an experienced set of eyeballs to give a new angle to the defensive staff.
People keep throwing out how good a recruiter he is, how terrible his defenses were, how combustible he is. It doesn't matter. He's a glorified grad assistant. He can't recruit off campus, and likely can't recruit on campus. He won't be coaching a position. He won't have final say over anything. He's just an experienced set of eyeballs to give a new angle to the defensive staff.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:00 am to graychef
quote:He's not here to scheme, I hope.
@myranwilkes: Would be a "good get" for Steele...not so much for LSU.
That would mean Chief is looking.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:01 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
He won't have final say over anything. He's just an experienced set of eyeballs to give a new angle to the defensive staff.
Thank you!
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:03 am to cajuntiger07
Seems like a great addition. DC experience, recruiting, been all over. The guy isn't our DC, not sure why his DC performance in the last bowl game has any affect on LSU. I seem to recall beating WVU on the road by a pretty significant margin.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:03 am to cajuntiger07
lol at people thinking this dude will have any impact on our defense. Dude will be the ensminger of defense
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:21 am to sunnydaze
quote:lol at u
Posted by sunnydaze lol at people thinking this dude will have any impact on our defense. Dude will be the ensminger of defense
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:25 am to drexyl
You posters that think he'll have no input whatsoever are dumb. Not that he will be making defensive call in the game, but an ex def coordinator isnt hired to do nothing. It's a good pickup by LSU.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:29 am to Rickdaddy4188
I'll assume your post wasn't directed at me. Steele is a great addition to the staff.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:32 am to Rickdaddy4188
Chief is not letting anybody meddle with his defense. I never said he'd be a fricking water boy and not contribute at all. He'll play his role, like Steve.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:46 am to sunnydaze
No one understands more what chief wants to do with LBs than Steele to think he will not benefit us is moronic
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:48 am to ninthward
Where did I say he wouldn't benefit us?
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:51 am to sunnydaze
Guys, it will make virtually zero impact whether he is or isn't on LSU's staff this season. He's basically just a Grad Assistant. He is good buddies with Chavis and this is the Chief giving him a chance to see if he still has the heart for coaching. Will make virtually no difference on the upcoming seaso.
Posted on 7/10/12 at 10:54 am to The ATL
As far as Steele as a coach, idk how he hasn't been more successful. He's worked under Tom Osbourne, Dom Capers, Nick Saban and now Chavis.
He surely didn't soak anything up though cause he is miserable. Really nice guy though!
He surely didn't soak anything up though cause he is miserable. Really nice guy though!
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News