- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
interest question. which would you take
Posted on 7/8/12 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 7/8/12 at 12:33 pm
300,000 house. which option would you take.
10% down at 3.625 for 30 years
20% down at 3.375 for 30 years
10% down at 3.000 for 15 years
20% down at 2.750 for 15 years
30,000 for 10 % or 60,000 for 20%... just say you had roughly 100,000 in the savings.
10% down at 3.625 for 30 years
20% down at 3.375 for 30 years
10% down at 3.000 for 15 years
20% down at 2.750 for 15 years
30,000 for 10 % or 60,000 for 20%... just say you had roughly 100,000 in the savings.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 12:42 pm to keeton350
quote:
20% down at 3.375 for 30 years
Posted on 7/8/12 at 1:32 pm to keeton350
What are you trying to do? Lower your payment, minimize your lifetime interest costs or some combination of the two?
Posted on 7/8/12 at 1:37 pm to keeton350
I'd put all four scenarios in an Excel spreadsheet and play with assumptions about these two things to see how they affect NPV:
1) Expected rate of inflation
2) Expected rate of return on investments
Make sure everything has the same tax basis - ex. if your mortgage interest is tax-deductible then you need to adjust to taxable equivalent.
The drawback to the 15 year is, of course, that by paying off early you are getting a very low ROI. If the stock market takes off at any time during the next 30 years (not 15, but 30) you will not do as well as someone with a 30 year note who invests the monthly amount difference during that 30 years. OTOH, if you don't invest it but will spend that monthly difference on beer then the 15 is better - even a low ROI is better than just blowing the money.
1) Expected rate of inflation
2) Expected rate of return on investments
Make sure everything has the same tax basis - ex. if your mortgage interest is tax-deductible then you need to adjust to taxable equivalent.
The drawback to the 15 year is, of course, that by paying off early you are getting a very low ROI. If the stock market takes off at any time during the next 30 years (not 15, but 30) you will not do as well as someone with a 30 year note who invests the monthly amount difference during that 30 years. OTOH, if you don't invest it but will spend that monthly difference on beer then the 15 is better - even a low ROI is better than just blowing the money.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 1:58 pm to keeton350
Can you invest the monthly amount you'd save by going with the 10% down @ 3.625% for 10 years to more than offset the additional interest you'd pay in that scenario?
Essentially another way of asking what foshizzle addressed.
Essentially another way of asking what foshizzle addressed.
This post was edited on 7/8/12 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 7/8/12 at 3:02 pm to keeton350
If you do 10% down will you have to pay PMI?
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:00 pm to foshizzle
Good info. Reading that for future reference had me thinking no way I would trust a wife to invest the difference. A women will always find a way to spend.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 7:12 pm to NukemVol
I just locked in at 3.375 for 30 yr.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 7:39 pm to keeton350
quote:
20% down at 2.750 for 15 years
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News