Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Kaman

Posted on 2/15/12 at 8:40 pm
Posted by lsutigers23
Member since Jan 2009
661 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 8:40 pm
Say we can't get much by trading Kaman, re-signing him might not be the worse thing ever. I know he's getting up thier in age and has been very injury plagued his entire career, but when healthy the dude can play. Pending what happens with the draft if we resign him we could potentially be very deep at PF/C next year.

Posted by DCBJR6
Madisonville, LA
Member since Jan 2011
4245 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 9:34 pm to
I'd love to have him for a couple more years, but if he stays healthy and continues to play this well all year, I think he will be asking for a pretty sizable contract that I wouldn't like to see us pay.
Posted by swlaLSUfan
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2009
3579 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 9:34 pm to
He has more offence than Okafor. And rebounding is equal.

Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61480 posts
Posted on 2/15/12 at 10:15 pm to
Okafor's contract and Kaman's market value make keeping kaman not an option.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22375 posts
Posted on 2/16/12 at 6:54 am to
quote:

Okafor's contract


Hopefully the new ownership will amnesty Okafor's contract.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61480 posts
Posted on 2/16/12 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Hopefully the new ownership will amnesty Okafor's contract.


Gary Chouest didn't buy the team in 2010 because he didn't want to eat any of Shinn's debt. Tom Benson would be buying the team to make money for his other investments. I can't see either of them willing to eat $28 million right after buying the team for $350 million.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22375 posts
Posted on 2/16/12 at 9:04 am to
quote:

I can't see either of them willing to eat $28 million right after buying the team for $350 million.


Maybe its wishful thinking but I would think a few teams would put in claims for Okafor at a reduced price 7-8 mil/yr meaning we wouldn't be on the hook for the whole contract.
Posted by Hank Marducas
Sittin' on the dock of the bay
Member since Sep 2009
5637 posts
Posted on 2/16/12 at 9:09 am to
The Heat are interested. They win it all if they get him.
LINK
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 2/16/12 at 11:30 am to
Kaman is a nice player and the basic numbers look good, but he is not very efficient at all. Considered to be an "offensive" center, he has a negative Offensive Win Share for his career. Okafor, for all his flaws, is at 16.4 OWS. At WS/48 Kaman is .058, Okafor .115. League average is .100.

LINK

LINK

Even if they can't deal him and if he takes considerably less money than I imagine he will be offered, why have Kaman and Okafor eating about $20 million of cap space when they can't play together? And are both closing in on 30? Why have an extra body taking minutes from at least one lottery big man? Not to mention minutes from Ayon, who appears to be very promising.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram