- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Am I the only person that thinks that JJ & JJ are getting railroaded?
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:13 pm
The accusation against these two has always been that they attacked Lowery(no matter how true is or not that is the allegation). However, they are being charged with 2nd degree battery which is called for by the injuries sustained by the driver(vertebrae damage). None of the eyewitnesses connected these two to the attack on the driver. The police didn't connect these two with the driver. What gives?
10
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:15 pm to A75CADDY
No, there are a few more of you in here. Thank goodness I am not one of them. 
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:15 pm to A75CADDY
ur the only one in the whole wide world.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:17 pm to LsuTool
I just don't see the justification for the charge. The guy they were connected to doesn't have any serious injuries.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:19 pm to A75CADDY
ray charles could see the railroading. BRPD are power hungry (and donut) scum..
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:19 pm to A75CADDY
I agree with you.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:19 pm to A75CADDY
The stomping of someone while on the ground is cause for the charge. There doesn't have to be long term injuries. The act alone is enough, unfortunately for JJ/JJ.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:20 pm to A75CADDY
I'm fairly sure that the BRPD didn't act on accusations alone.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:20 pm to A75CADDY
Caddy, if you kicked someone who had surrendered, and I told the cops I saw you do it. You would be arrested.
They got every concievable benefit of the doubt. It sucks and I wish the guy would have dropped charges but he didn't. One bad decision cost JJ this oppurtunity, but it's that way for all of us!! If I was at a company meeting and defended a girl by getting into a fight, I would be fired the next day. It's life.
They got every concievable benefit of the doubt. It sucks and I wish the guy would have dropped charges but he didn't. One bad decision cost JJ this oppurtunity, but it's that way for all of us!! If I was at a company meeting and defended a girl by getting into a fight, I would be fired the next day. It's life.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:20 pm to A75CADDY
No u are not....Lousiana is one of a few places where they eat their own.... Make a bar fight look like somebodys a long time criminal....its ridiculous!
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:20 pm to LSU6969
quote:
The stomping of someone while on the ground is cause for the charge. There doesn't have to be long term injuries. The act alone is enough, unfortunately for JJ/JJ.
that incident isn't enough to charge JJ/JJ. BRPD doesn't have enough proof for it.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:21 pm to A75CADDY
quote:
I just don't see the justification for the charge
ok
quote:
getting railroaded
how do you go from the above to this?
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:21 pm to A75CADDY
If JJ would have used his fist I would say railroaded. A judge would throw out any bar fistfight...but the matter of the foot is a different story
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:22 pm to A75CADDY
quote:
I just don't see the justification for the charge.
Your P&G glasses are blurring your vision.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:22 pm to A75CADDY
If the shoe don't fit....
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:23 pm to LSU6969
quote:
The stomping of someone while on the ground is cause for the charge. There doesn't have to be long term injuries. The act alone is enough, unfortunately for JJ/JJ
I beg to differ. The seriousness of the injuries dictate the degree of the charge. They don't even have concrete proof that either one of them stomped the kid. The kicker in the video looks to be about 5'10" using the girl he was standing next to as a frame of reference.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:25 pm to LSU6969
quote:
The stomping of someone while on the ground is cause for the charge
Not true. Second degree battery requires a specific type of injury.
Lowery is claiming loss of consciousness which would satisfy that "severe" injury needed for a 2nd degree battery charge.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:28 pm to JBeam
quote:
that incident isn't enough to charge JJ/JJ.BRPD doesn't have enough proof for it.
By what you can see. Maybe they have a litttle more than what you can see. Why don't you go ask them to let you see.
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:28 pm to Antonio Moss
LOUISIANA SECOND DEGREE BATTERY LAW
LSA-R.S. 14:34.1
A. Second degree battery is a battery when the offender intentionally inflicts serious bodily injury; however, this provision shall not apply to a medical provider who has obtained the consent of a patient.
B. For purposes of this Section, "serious bodily injury" means bodily injury which involves unconsciousness, extreme physical pain or protracted and obvious disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty, or a substantial risk of death.
C. Whoever commits the crime of second degree battery shall be fined not more than two thousand dollars or imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than five years, or both.
The above statute is provided as a service of Babcock Partners. If you or a loved one has been charged with this crime and would like to hire an attorney, please call us toll-free at 1-866-309-0911.
Updated August 12, 2010
LSA-R.S. 14:34.1
A. Second degree battery is a battery when the offender intentionally inflicts serious bodily injury; however, this provision shall not apply to a medical provider who has obtained the consent of a patient.
B. For purposes of this Section, "serious bodily injury" means bodily injury which involves unconsciousness, extreme physical pain or protracted and obvious disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty, or a substantial risk of death.
C. Whoever commits the crime of second degree battery shall be fined not more than two thousand dollars or imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than five years, or both.
The above statute is provided as a service of Babcock Partners. If you or a loved one has been charged with this crime and would like to hire an attorney, please call us toll-free at 1-866-309-0911.
Updated August 12, 2010
Posted on 8/26/11 at 3:29 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
how do you go from the above to this?
Actually I stated that they were railroaded first. But, my assertion is that the charge against the two isn't warranted if they were involved in the story as it has been relayed by police.(I didn't even get into whether or not that is the actual occurrence of events). I'm just saying that what the police said they did does not warrant 2nd degree charges. First degree I can see, but not second.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News