- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
No Country For Old Men
Posted on 10/25/09 at 12:47 am
Posted on 10/25/09 at 12:47 am
Just got around to watching it and i think i liked it. Just a little unclear about the ending. Was Suger(sp?) in the hotel room when Tommy Lee Jones went back into it? What did tommy lee jones dreams at the end mean?
Posted on 10/25/09 at 1:14 am to dome53
quote:As to whether or not the killer (Chigurh) was in the room when Jones went back, the movie was unclear, but I read the book and in the book the Chigurh is not in the room. He's long gone.
Just got around to watching it and i think i liked it. Just a little unclear about the ending. Was Suger(sp?) in the hotel room when Tommy Lee Jones went back into it? What did tommy lee jones dreams at the end mean?
The dream at the end is about Sheriff Bell and his role as a son and as a lawman like his father and grandfather. His father died as a lawman at an age younger than Bell is now. Bell decides to retire and not join his father prematurely, but he will inevitably join him one day. In the dream, his father passed by him out into the darkness, already dead, and he's waiting for Bell to join him by the fire out in that vast unknown of whatever comes after life.
Here's a longer explanation from another sourse:
quote:
The two dreams can be seen as expressions of what Bell is struggling with throughout the course of the story and the change of perspective that allows him to come to terms with his struggle.
In the first dream he says his father entrusted him with some money, but he (Bell) lost it. This can be seen as Bell feeling as if he was entrusted with a responsibility and has failed to uphold it. His failure to keep and protect something valuable like the money is analogous to his failure as a law enforcement officer to protect people like Moss and Carla Jean, other civilians, and to make a significant impact on crime in general. This dream explains what is troubling him and that he feels or is afraid that he may be a failure. Because his father is mentioned explicitly it is likely that he may feel he has failed his father, who was also a law-man, on a personal level.
The second dream is a reconciliation of the problem from the first. In the second dream, he says he and his father were riding through the mountains in the old times. His father rode up ahead of him and went on into the cold and dark with some fire. Bell said that he knew when he got to where his father was going, his father would be there waiting for him.
This indicates that Bell realizes that his father is waiting for him nonetheless, whether he is a failure or not. The dark and cold would represent the real world and the fire represents comfort, protection and hope. His father carries it onward, and Bell knows he will be waiting with it for him when he gets there himself. The dream seems to be an acknowledgement of the state of the world and bleak reality. Bell cannot change that state or leave it, just as his father was also unable to do. But he is able to take comfort in knowing that his father is waiting there for him with a source of comfort, a source of light and heat in all that dark and cold.
The second dream indicates that Bell has come to a realization, at least on some level, of the concept that Ellis spoke of in their earlier conversation. Ellis says, "Whatcha got ain't nothin new. This country's hard on people. You can't stop what's coming; it ain't all waiting on you. That's vanity," meaning that Bell can not expect himself to succeed at the standard to which he has held himself, and so it is unreasonable to do so. Bell felt compelled to continue past a reasonable age and into unmanagable situations in order to uphold the responsibility he felt had been passed down to him. When he realizes he can't do this he feels overmatched, and quits by retiring. He had tasked himself with the impossible (in an attempt to live up to his father, or previous law-men, etc.) and blamed himself for failing to succeed. Bell may not realize it consciously yet, but the dreams show that on some level, after his talk with Ellis, he realized that the world had always been this way and always would be (dark and cold), but that there are sources of refuge and comfort waiting for him.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 1:26 am to L.A.
quote:
As to whether or not the killer (Chigurh) was in the room when Jones went back, the movie was unclear, but I read the book and in the book the Chigurh is not in the room. He's long gone.
Thats what I was thinking.
And thanks for clearing up the dreams.
I knew this would be a good movie, with all the reviews i read, and i think it will be even better the second time i watch it.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 1:29 am to dome53
Anything with Woody Harrelson in it is worth watching. He is a great actor.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 2:57 am to DanMullenIsOurMan
I remember hearing people talk about how they hated the ending of the movie...
Then I watched it for
myself and thought it was the perfect ending to that movie. I thought there was no other suitable way for it to end and I got the allusion in the second dream as clear as day.
Then I thought about those people that Hated how the movie ended and felt sorry because I realized there are probably alot of things in the books I enjoy, the music I enjoy, the movies I enjoy, and the social situations that happen everyday that those people just don't get meaning from.
Then I watched it for
myself and thought it was the perfect ending to that movie. I thought there was no other suitable way for it to end and I got the allusion in the second dream as clear as day.
Then I thought about those people that Hated how the movie ended and felt sorry because I realized there are probably alot of things in the books I enjoy, the music I enjoy, the movies I enjoy, and the social situations that happen everyday that those people just don't get meaning from.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 10:21 am to KBeezy
I'm still laughing at how no one seemed to have heard the big wreck and the end.
and
I'm still wondering how we're supposed to assume that no one saw a busted up and hurt man like Chigurh walking down a quiet neighborhood.
Worst ending to a drama EVER.
and
I'm still wondering how we're supposed to assume that no one saw a busted up and hurt man like Chigurh walking down a quiet neighborhood.
Worst ending to a drama EVER.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 10:29 am to Marciano1
Good grief, captain literal. Give it a little more thought, and if you think this is the worst ending to a drama ever... you don't watch enough movies. Did you want the happy ending?
Posted on 10/25/09 at 10:51 am to dome53
quote:I actually re-watched it the other day and have concluded he wasn't in the room. I never read the book, but there's physically no way Chigurh could have made it from behind the door, across the room and out the bathroom window without making a noise enough for Bell to hear from right outside. I think the editing makes us almost believe they could be next to each other. You can see the light shift through the lock hole on Chigurh's side of the door. But I think this is done in part to mirror the scene earlier when Bell just misses Chigurh in Moss's place. It could also represent, though Bell viewed himself as a "failure," just how close he was to actually catching up to Chigurh and that he really has been more than adequate in striving to achieve the impossible task of protecting the "innocent" from "all that dark and all that cold" in the world.
Was Suger(sp?) in the hotel room when Tommy Lee Jones went back into it?
Posted on 10/25/09 at 12:38 pm to Marciano1
Who cares if anyone saw him walking down the street or heard the wreck?
That is completely insignificant and if that is what you are worried about when watching s movie like this then you must be one of the unfortunate ones who can't draw meaning from a deeper place
That is completely insignificant and if that is what you are worried about when watching s movie like this then you must be one of the unfortunate ones who can't draw meaning from a deeper place
Posted on 10/25/09 at 1:48 pm to KBeezy
quote:
I'm still wondering how we're supposed to assume that no one saw a busted up and hurt man like Chigurh walking down a quiet neighborhood. Worst ending to a drama EVER.
And Star Wars is far-fetched.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 2:23 pm to CTexTiger
quote:
Good grief, captain literal. Give it a little more thought, and if you think this is the worst ending to a drama ever... you don't watch enough movies. Did you want the happy ending?
The movie could have ended as soon as Chigurh walked out of Moss' girlfriend's house. The wreck scene was unnecessary. I understand the wreck was supposed to show that "evil can be slowed down, but not stopped". I didn't need that symbolism to tell me that. It was a little unrealistic in my opinion. No one heard the crash? No one saw Chigurh walking down the road?
Again, the credits could have rolled as soon as Chigurh walked out of the house.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 3:19 pm to Marciano1
The scene served a purpose in the book. It did not serve a purpose in the movie.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 3:32 pm to Marciano1
quote:
It was a little unrealistic in my opinion. No one heard the crash? No one saw Chigurh walking down the road?
Do you even enjoy movies? Stop trying to overthink a scene by putting logic to it. IT'S A frickING MOVIE. Have you ever watched Terminator and said "My gosh this movie is terrible it's so unrealistic." What makes this one different?
Posted on 10/25/09 at 3:34 pm to Turkey Burger
/* Book Spoiler */
someone did figure out who he was from the crash.
someone did figure out who he was from the crash.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 3:36 pm to Turkey Burger
I agree with this. Generally literary mechanisms do not translate well to the screen. This movie tried to but kinda came up short. The characters were so well written that the movie held up on that alone.
This post was edited on 10/25/09 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 10/25/09 at 5:22 pm to Marciano1
quote:
I'm still laughing at how no one seemed to have heard the big wreck and the end.
and
I'm still wondering how we're supposed to assume that no one saw a busted up and hurt man like Chigurh walking down a quiet neighborhood.
Worst ending to a drama EVER.
So much for people grasping the significance of a scene.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:09 pm to Turkey Burger
quote:
Do you even enjoy movies? Stop trying to overthink a scene by putting logic to it. IT'S A frickING MOVIE. Have you ever watched Terminator and said "My gosh this movie is terrible it's so unrealistic." What makes this one different?
Terrible comparison right there. No Country for Old Men is a drama....Terminator is science fiction.
That's like comparing Gone With the Wind to Star Wars
I enjoy movies big time, but when I watch a serious and realistic drama, I expect it to stay that way all the way through. In sci-fi movies, I expect fake sh!t to happen. In action/adventure movies, I expect the focus to be on action instead of acting and storylines.
This post was edited on 10/25/09 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:26 pm to Marciano1
quote:
Terrible comparison right there.
Not really. A movie is fiction. Whether it's "based on a true story" a sci fi flick or whatever. The only exception is a documentary, and even those can be manipulated.
Nonetheless, No Country For Old Men was directed by the Coen Brothers. These guys have made a career out of exaggerated characters and scenes.
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:40 pm to Turkey Burger
quote:
Coen Brothers
Speaking of them, have you seen their new movie, A Serious Man?
Posted on 10/25/09 at 10:15 pm to L.A.
quote:
Because his father is mentioned explicitly it is likely that he may feel he has failed his father, who was also a law-man, on a personal level.
Maybe it's quibbling but Sheriff Bell's father was a horse trader, not a law-man; his grandfather was a Sheriff though. He was closer to his grandfather and emulated him while he never knew his father very well, partly because he died at a younger age than Bell is now.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News