- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wells Fargo Employee Fired for Carrying Concealed Handgun
Posted on 2/23/14 at 7:51 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
Posted on 2/23/14 at 7:51 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
How stupid of her to let another employee see it
FIFY
I would bet money that she showed a "girl friend" employee and the two later had a falling out and said exfriend reported it.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 8:54 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
Sometimes personal safety overrides rules and regulations. She didnt even break a law. How stupid of her trying to keep herself safe
People get fired for ignoring company rules everyday that aren't against the law. Its a private company that has rules that are to be followed, or the employee gets fired simple as that. If there was a written rule that said she had to walk through the door backwards every morning and she didn't, they could fire her and yet its not against the law to walk through doors forwards
I agree its a stupid rule and that is why I make sure I can carry at work before I accepted my job, but that is my choice and was also her's when she accepted her job.
This post was edited on 2/23/14 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 2/23/14 at 9:36 pm to bapple
Didn't read the article, but I'm assuming it's against company policy. If so, the employee was obviously in the wrong.
I work in a plant and you obviously can't have firearms in the plant or any plant owned parking lots. It sucks, especially because it's in a bad part of town. But it's plant policy, so I don't carry in my truck.
I work in a plant and you obviously can't have firearms in the plant or any plant owned parking lots. It sucks, especially because it's in a bad part of town. But it's plant policy, so I don't carry in my truck.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 9:38 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
Sometimes personal safety overrides rules and regulations. She didnt even break a law. How stupid of her trying to keep herself safe
You are an idiot.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 9:56 pm to chalupa
quote:
I work in a plant and you obviously can't have firearms in the plant or any plant owned parking lots. It sucks, especially because it's in a bad part of town.
Yea these rules are pretty effing stupid for this exact reason. Plants are also usually in the middle of nowhere. One single armed person could take the whole place over and use all the chemicals to do some serious damage.
But until something like that happens, the sheeple will be happy with the current setup.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 9:57 pm to chalupa
quote:
I work in a plant and you obviously can't have firearms in the plant or any plant owned parking lots.
Thats not true at all. I work at a TWIC compliant refinery and you are allowed to have a firearm in you vehicle OUTSIDE of the plant entrance. Now if you are parking inside the fence of the refinery you cant have anything, but outside of the gate you're fine. Just as this lady would have been had she kept it in her vehicle.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 10:02 pm to chalupa
How so? You make a claim then run like a coward. Please explain yourself.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 10:05 pm to bapple
I agree with both the company's policy and their decision to fire her.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 10:09 pm to SabiDojo
As do I. I also hope she lands a better job at the end of the day.
Posted on 2/23/14 at 10:31 pm to bapple
For those of you that disagree with this, blame those that file frivolous lawsuits. This is more of a liability issue.
Posted on 2/24/14 at 7:38 am to jmarto1
You mean Mondays? And although the company was well within their right to fire her for disobeying a COMPANY POLICY, it doesnt make said policy any less stupid. I brought this up in a safety meeting at work which was coincidentally about what should be done in the event of a company shooting and i said we might as well stick our head between our legs and kiss our asses goodbye. If the right person with the right weapon wanted in, they could do some serious damage, unless the security guard managed to walkie talkie him to death.
Posted on 2/24/14 at 7:42 am to dnm3305
quote:
If the right person with the right weapon wanted in, they could do some serious damage, unless the security guard managed to walkie talkie him to death.
Walkie Talkies!!!??? What!?
There are so many places that are defended by some "security guard" with nothing more than a walkie talkie and MAYBE a tazer. Besides that, someone could easily bust into just about any office nationwide and do serious damage. But they prefer us to be sitting ducks than insurance liabilities.
Posted on 2/24/14 at 8:34 am to bapple
quote:
One single armed person could take the whole place over and use all the chemicals to do some serious damage.
That's a little exaggerated
Posted on 2/24/14 at 8:53 am to brass2mouth
quote:
Thats not true at all. I work at a TWIC compliant refinery and you are allowed to have a firearm in you vehicle OUTSIDE of the plant entrance. Now if you are parking inside the fence of the refinery you cant have anything, but outside of the gate you're fine. Just as this lady would have been had she kept it in her vehicle.
It's true for the plant I work at. Obviously different policies for different companies.
Eta: when I said any plant parking lot, I meant any of the plant (that I work at) owned parking lots.
This post was edited on 2/24/14 at 9:00 am
Posted on 2/24/14 at 8:56 am to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
How so? You make a claim then run like a coward. Please explain yourself
It's been explained to you already by shawnlsu. If you still don't understand, I can't help you.
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:15 am to Boats n Hose
quote:
That's a little exaggerated
If every employee has followed the rules of disarmament, I really don't think it is at all. Besides fences and some personnel, there is very little TRUE security at plants.
Nuclear plants are a different story. But your regular run-of-the-mill chemical plant is very porous.
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:39 am to bapple
Meh, nothing to see here. Private company, etc.
I do note that if she had a problem with the policy, perhaps she could have challenged it in some way rather than take a "better to ask for forgiveness than permission" approach.
Sometimes it is better to ask permission first.
The policy itself is like most gun-free zone policies: stupid.
I do note that if she had a problem with the policy, perhaps she could have challenged it in some way rather than take a "better to ask for forgiveness than permission" approach.
Sometimes it is better to ask permission first.
The policy itself is like most gun-free zone policies: stupid.
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:44 am to USMCTiger03
I could be wrong but I believe there is some sort of federal law preventing those in the finance indutry from carrying at work. I am pretty certain stock brokers cannot carry and this could be the same for bank employees.
Posted on 2/24/14 at 10:45 am to DanTiger
Not saying your wrong, but please reference that information regarding the financial industry if you can find it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News