Started By
Message

Oil & Gas lease offer for a recreational property in SW Miss. - what to look out for

Posted on 5/12/21 at 5:35 pm
Posted by dcw7g
Member since Dec 2003
1967 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 5:35 pm
I’ve got a camp with a couple hundred acres for hunting in SW Mississippi that I bought about 10 years ago. Last week got a call that an oil company based in Texas would like to lease a chunk of it for exploration and potentially drilling. They’re offering $50 dollars per acre, then 3/16th royalty if they drill a producing well. There’s more to it but that’s the gist.

Anyone know if this sounds standard? Anything I should be worried about?

Frankly, I didn’t even know I’d bought mineral rights with the property so it all seems like gravy to me.
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17253 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 5:44 pm to
Check out mineral rights. Mississippi is screwed up when it comes to mineral rights as they are perpetual and most rights were bought uo years ago by big companies who will never let them go
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 5:45 pm
Posted by stewie
Member since Jan 2006
3950 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

Anything I should be worried about?


My one simple and important suggestion, hire an attorney. It’s worth the money to have great legal representation in these matters.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20702 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 5:49 pm to
$50. I got $5000 an acre back in 2009.

I’d hold out for a lot more per acre and I’d rather 1/8 royalties before any production costs etc .... instead of 3/16 after production cost.

Most of the leases we have are 1/8 or 3/16 royalties before costs. Also have a clause that if the locate a site on your land they have to restore it to its former self or as close as possible.

They pay for any damages etc... they cause to your land


My dad refused to sign a lease in 2011 for $2500 an acre and they threatened to go ahead a drill I. His section without giving him $$$$ per acre. He smiled and said go ahead I’ll make more in the long run if you bring in a well.

There is tons of good information out there do your research also make sure they specify how deep and what play (shale) they are drilling into looking for oil/gas.

Companies or land people are trying to get you to sign at the least amount favorable to them. It’s a negotiation. You want to specify that if they don’t bring in a working well or if they don’t produce your section within 3-5 years the mineral rights revert back to you and also make sure your lease does not give them rights to anything other than minerals and like I said earlier they are responsible for any surface damage
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 5:55 pm
Posted by dcw7g
Member since Dec 2003
1967 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Check out mineral rights. Mississippi is screwed up when it comes to mineral rights as they are perpetual and most rights were bought uo years ago by big companies who will never let them go


The company did some sort of title search and determined I own 50% of the mineral rights for my property, the other 50 is owned by some other entity. When I bought the place, the seller didn’t think he had the mineral rights at all, but really wasn’t sure.
Posted by dcw7g
Member since Dec 2003
1967 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

$50. I got $5000 an acre back in 2009.


I think we’re talking about different things. I bought the land for $2500 an acre, no way anyone is going to lease it for $5000 an acre. They could buy any land they want in the county outright for that much. The $50 per acre just gives them the right to explore.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20702 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

the other 50 is owned by some other entity.


That sucks. Probably sold the rights along time ago and whoever bought them retained 1/2 after so long
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20702 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

think we’re talking about different things. I bought the land for $2500 an acre, no way anyone is going to lease it for $5000 an acre. They could buy any land they want in the county outright for that much. The $50 per acre just gives them the right to explore.



In 2007-2009 people in louisianaxwas getting $5000-$25,000 an acre because they had just discovered the haynesville shale and new fracing was able to open up more oil and gas drilling.

I’m saying the folks in those areas that signed (2004-2006) when companies first came around offering $50-$150 an acre got screwed by not waiting and finding out why that area was all of a sudden a hot bed for leasing


I know several people in their 20’s that became instant millionaires just because the owned land and knew not to sign the first offer.

They always try to get the largest land owners first then work down the the ones with less acreage. I’d have probably signed a lease for a lot less than $5000 but my family has several leases with wells and my dad has been teaching me since the 80’s about oil/gas and timber. Do the research on the haynesville shale and see what happened in northwest Louisiana and east Texas in the early 2000’s


Could be a new formation that a company has discovered and that they have the equipment and technology that now allows them to drill and get to the gas/oil and make a sizable profit.

Has anyone been doing testing around ???? They usually will do testing to see if they can detect anything underground and then get a good idea what and how far down before deciding if it would be profitable to lease and drill or just lease so no other company can come in and try to develop the area. This is why it’s important to specify I. Your lease that the rights will revert back to you if they don’t drill and/or bring in a well BBC within a given time frame. Otherwise the original company that leases your land will hold onto it for however long they want to
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 6:07 pm
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20702 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

$50 per acre just gives them the right to explore.



That’s about right as long as it’s only for exploring and they don’t actually own the rights. They might just be fishing to see what’s there and how deep.

Posted by chew4219
Member since Sep 2009
2723 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 6:49 pm to
You may own the land and not the minerals. If you do own the mineral right take not less than 1/4 royalty.

Demand that any environmental impact be restored to its original condition. If there is any value in timber that is/will be removed ask for compensation.

More royalties is way better than higher land lease.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
13818 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 7:11 pm to
“No warranty” in your lease.

If I were you I would first figure out what I owned.

I would try and negotiate a higher bonus and royalty just because.

Ask them what they want to do, what are they after.

Ask them about surface use, if they make a gas well they will need a pipeline, oil possibly pipeline or all weather road.

The Haynesville /bonuses, etc from 2008+ will likey not apply possibly ever again except somewhere like the HA. I’ve recently heard of $2500/ac bonuses.

Pre Haynesville in NWLA standard Cotton Valley/ Lower CV leases were $150-$250 per net acre and the highest royalty percentage one could negotiate up to 1/4, standard was around 1/4, 1/5 or 3/16. 3 yr term.

I know shite about SWMS.

Pugh clauses, worth gold in the HA on shallow, producing leases when the HA deal broke loose.
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 7:13 pm
Posted by TigerV
Member since Feb 2007
2505 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

The $50 per acre just gives them the right to explore.


This is partially correct and can be where this gets complicated which is why you want an attorney. During conventional drilling times, companies would take a seismic or exploration lease for a few dollars (maybe $50/ac) which gives them the right to shoot seismic and collect the data. Depending on the outcome, they would then have the right to lease the land at a set amount. That could be this or it could be an outright lease, whereby they pay you the $50/ac and they get the right to not just explore but still and develop the land. They would also get 75-85% of the revenue interest and you would keep the remaining 15-25%. Since you own the surface, you need to work in the surface usage language, which is cost for damages from the operations and the cost to lease right of ways for any pipelines they may need.

It’s a good thing if you can get a lease and they find something, but you need to make sure your protected and have a solid lease and SUA
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8274 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

My dad refused to sign a lease in 2011 for $2500 an acre and they threatened to go ahead a drill I. His section without giving him $$$$ per acre. He smiled and said go ahead I’ll make more in the long run if you bring in a well.


Yeah bonuses in the haynesville are around $500-$1000 an acre these days. You can’t compare the crazy land rush of 2008 to anything else in oil and gas leasing as we won’t see that ever again. This is likely a conventional shallow play if I had to guess and they’re probably after Wilcox or lower Tuscaloosa in that area. Small trap and probably won’t bump the royalty or the bonus much although you can try. If he owns a big enough tract and won’t lease they’ll go somewhere else. Riding down wells without leasing in Louisiana and Texas is not for the faint of heart. I saw a lot of people do it in 08-09 and get under wells that never paid out and haven’t made a penny off of it to date. Going unleased equals working interest in Louisiana and not everybody can handle that. Try that in Texas and you risk getting cut out of the unit as most people know Texas is very operator friendly. I’m not up to speed on mississippi forced pooling but he’s better off asking some questions and getting some no cost language, depth clauses, and other standard protection versus trying to act like Weyerhaeuser or the like.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

They’re offering $50 dollars per acre
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
13818 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

They’re offering $50 dollars per acre


might be for an option just to tie him up. I agree with getting an atty or someone to consult that knows their shite on the area.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20702 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 9:20 pm to
Royalties definitely the way to go. When the haynesville shale was booming I was getting around $400-500 a month per acre for the first year, $350 the 2nd year, and so on and so on. Now it’s about $5 an acre a month but natural gas prices bottomed out awhile ago. I got 3/16 pre cost royalties so I was happy. I tried for 1/4 but it was a no go.

Will it pick up again probably not to 2000’s numbers but who knows once has bottomed out they pretty much reduced the output to almost nothing. Just enough to turn a profit and keep the leases active
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 9:22 pm
Posted by Manchac Man
Member since Dec 2014
1508 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 9:25 pm to
Go with a 1/5 royalty $100/year per acre with Pugh clauses. Lots of other smaller things to consider, but take some money while there is money to take with the bonus payments. Likely they will not produce anything and are just prospective leasing with the intent to flip it.
Most larger production companies will not touch Mississippi right now. The TMS has to have oil around $100 to be profitable at best. Don’t lease more than 3yrs.
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8274 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Likely they will not produce anything and are just prospective leasing with the intent to flip it. Most larger production companies will not touch Mississippi right now.


Or they’re a smaller company drilling small conventional prospects. He needs more information but if the company is indeed after a conventional trap they’re going to be focused on putting their money in the ground and not into huge lease bonuses they don’t have to pay. Not a lot of competition driving bonuses higher these days even in shale plays where operators are working on organic inventory.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:21 pm to
Get an oil and gas attorney to help you out. The Hiedelburg group around Laurel used to represent a bunch of landowners around Laurel
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48885 posts
Posted on 5/13/21 at 4:32 am to
quote:

think we’re talking about different things. I bought the land for $2500 an acre, no way anyone is going to lease it for $5000 an acre. They could buy any land they want in the county outright for that much. The $50 per acre just gives them the right to explore.


One doesn't have anything to do with the other, in the Haynesville boom land bought for 500 dollars an acre 10 years before was leasing for 25k an acre.

Lol but those days are long gone
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram