Need a good laugh? Watch liberals debate a CCW holder shooting a robber.

This my friends is how the liberal mind thinks. The comments are gold...

quote:

---

What does that have do with anything?

You sound a typical republican. you should stop watching fox news and go outside or go back to red state.

---

Sounds like a classic

quote:

---

nichomachus
12. Oh goody. A wild west shootout in a bank
Filled with other customers and employees. Why what could go wrong? Could have turned into a bloodbath with others killed and wounded. It didn't this time, but it could have.

It's only money. Let them take it.

---

Wow.

Okay, this next quote is going to be long so just skip to the last paragraph and it sums up the OP the best...

quote:

---

mac2766
69. I understand
You support the action taken by what could easily be an untrained gunman in the situation. An action that could easily have been disastrous.

There is no argument that can be made by me or anyone else against a person who defends themselves in a life-threatening situation. What really needs to be considered is not the outcome, but the implication of the action taken by the shooter. If discharging a weapon in a building endangers the lives of innocent people, should the gun have been discharged? My position is no. Should one individual endanger the lives of one or more individuals to protect himself? My position is no. If I am threatened, I will protect myself, but I will not endanger the lives of others in doing so.

And as for the nit... vigilante / not a vigilante. We can agree to disagree. My opinion is that this was an act of vigilante justice carried out by a very reckless individual.

I strongly support the 2nd amendment. The right to keep and bear arms should remain a right... but... on the same note, we as American citizens should also have the right to protect ourselves against those who shouldn't posses a gun. There needs to be a balance between insanity and freedom. I live between two very different types of people. On one side of me is a highly trained ex-navy weapons expert. On the other side, a mentally unbalanced red-neck. Both have guns, as is their right. Which would I feel more comfortable being around when they are brandishing their weapons? Take a guess. There needs to be regulation. If you brandish a weapon, it should be a requirement that you have the mental capacity to understand the consequences of actions taken by you with that weapon. I was trained as a young man by the Indiana Hunters Association, by a friends father who happened to be a Deputy Sheriff, and by the US Military. I have yet to brandish a weapon in a public place, and would never carry one in a public place. That act alone could get a person shot.

---

and I'll leave this sweet little morsel from the OT right here for y'all

I'll check in on that thread tomorrow, he has already rustled Roadgotors jimmies... Interesting note, me and roadGator grew up together in Va... It's going to be interesting to see where he goes with the anti-gun fgt

Stupid motherfrickers. Obviously.

I initially thought Hoyt was trolling, but he is sincere and in his efforts to be legally retarded.


Probably on the dummy check and wants to keep the status quo...

Yep they hate the NRA...