Started By
Message

Infrared cameras on Bourbon st to detect concealed guns??

Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:53 pm
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17252 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:53 pm
LINK

French Quarter safety plan could include cameras that can spot guns through clothing

BY JEFF ADELSON | jadelson@theadvocate.comJan 11, 2017 - 7:30 pm
Cameras that can spot guns through layers of clothing — using infrared or similar technologies — may be included in sweeping new security measures for Bourbon Street to be proposed soon by Mayor Mitch Landrieu, according to several people familiar with the plan.

The cameras would be able to pick up on differences in the temperature between guns and human bodies, allowing officers to then focus on those carrying weapons.

The idea is part of a broader effort to prevent the type of shootout that killed one person and wounded nine others on Bourbon Street in November, as well as to avert potential terrorist attacks. But stepped-up surveillance of that kind will inevitably raise questions about privacy and constitutional rights.

Related

Mayor Mitch Landrieu is working on plans for new permanent security measures along Bourbon S…
Details about the overall security plan have not been released by Landrieu’s administration, and it is unclear whether the high-tech scanners will end up in the final version of the proposal, which also calls for making much of Bourbon Street a pedestrian mall.

But several people briefed on the ideas being discussed said infrared-type cameras are on the table.

Bob Simms, who runs the private police details known as the French Quarter Task Force, said administration officials had discussed using the new cameras as they laid out the security plan and likened them to installing metal detectors. But Simms said the cameras would likely involve fewer logistical challenges than trying to corral revelers through security gates and might seem less intimidating.

“A lot of the businesses don’t like (metal detectors); they think it gives the wrong impression,” he said. “I think people are looking at whether there is other technology that would achieve the same objective.”

Various research papers have been written about the possibility of using infrared and other imaging technologies for just such a purpose. Several companies also market cameras claiming to detect any kind of contraband through clothing.

But it is not clear whether any city has tried to deploy the cameras on a widespread basis or along a public street.

Several media outlets reported in 2013 that the New York City Police Department was testing the technology, though it does not appear it was ever put to use. An NYPD spokesman said the department “does not have cameras that would be able to detect concealed weapons.”

Published reports about the technology suggest it has a limited range and would not be suitable for scanning large crowds, meaning the devices likely would have to be set up at checkpoints near various entrances to the street.

Overall, the plan calls for an increase in the number of cameras monitoring Bourbon Street; the results could be fed into a centralized command center. Other cameras capable of reading license plates could be installed on the edges of the Quarter to allow officers to track suspects fleeing the scene of a crime, Simms said.

“I think we have a very multifaceted approach to this thing. Some people say, 'Let's just put more cops on the street,' but that’s not going to solve everything even if we had them,” he said.

But the surveillance plan, and the potential for new cameras in particular, raises concerns among some.

Marjorie Esman, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana, said she had not heard anything about the plans or the technology but found it “very disturbing.”

“I think that this is a violation of people’s constitutional rights, and I cannot imagine that the public will accept that,” Esman said. “It really defies common sense because it presumes that everybody carrying a weapon is going to use it for an improper purpose, and that’s just not the case.”

There are significant questions about how police would use the information gleaned from the cameras and whether that information would be enough justification to search those believed to have weapons, Esman said. That’s particularly true if they would be set up on a public street, where standards are different than requiring people to go through metal detectors or body scanners at airports.

And, she said, significant surveillance in any public area is cause for concern when it’s not clear how the video will be used, who will view it and how long it will be stored.

“We know that people come to New Orleans and they do things that they don’t necessarily want to be sent back to friends, neighbors and colleagues wherever they live,” Esman said.

And, she noted, the recent high-profile shootings on Bourbon Street have come with police standing nearby.

“I’m not sure what a camera is going to do,” she said.
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 8:54 pm
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
30696 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:58 pm to
Mitch Landrieu is a dumbass.
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
14265 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:02 pm to
He is almost out of office. Sounds like the perfect time for him to start a business selling these cameras.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:04 pm to
Sounds like technology that will be very expensive and very ineffective.

Willing to bet it doesn't work....especially in crowded areas.
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11877 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:11 pm to
So rather than try to fix the root of the problem in those poor communities (mostly the war on drugs and single-parent households) they continue their 1984-style assault on the entire populace? Yea, that'll work.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:38 pm to
Yeah this will work great on a crowded street after a ball game. LOfnL.
Posted by TygerDurden
Member since Sep 2009
1846 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

final version of the proposal, which also calls for making much of Bourbon Street a pedestrian mall.


How in the hell is this to work?
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
30696 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

So rather than try to fix the root of the problem in those poor communities (mostly the war on drugs and single-parent households) they continue their 1984-style assault on the entire populace? Yea, that'll work.


Ill have to find the article. Found it today on nola. Was from a year or 2 ago about gun violence.

Dude says pretty much that law abiding gun owners need to understand what they are responsible for and that makes need to be more strict on the law abiding folks.
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
4644 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:57 pm to
Assuming the cameras even work as advertised, it's probably unconstitutional for officers to stop a person based solely on the information from the cameras.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

it's probably unconstitutional for officers to stop a person based solely on the information from the cameras.


I don't think so.

Its on public property. And it isn't intrusive. So if it worked it would probably be allowed.

But again...I would highly doubt it works worth a damn.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
14021 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:12 pm to
So bourbon street is a "gun free zone" now?
Posted by CP3
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
7401 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:19 pm to
Sounds like a good way for them to spot my raging hot boner
Posted by TheCurmudgeon
Not where I want to be
Member since Aug 2014
1481 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:36 am to
Serious question, can one legally carry concealed (w a license) on Bourbon Street? Obviously can't go in the bars, but outside on the street?

I've not heard that before and looked but can't find anything. TIA
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18895 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:41 am to
quote:

But again...I would highly doubt it works worth a damn.


I was at a trade show recently where a defense contractor had a new IR hybrid camera set up and I could clearly see that the booth babe two rows over was wearing a thong under her slacks. How that test in a convention hall translates to a city street full of people I am not sure.

On a related note, as my buddy and I were zooming in on her and looking through the small screen of the hand held controller, we were unaware that the image was being broadcast on the 70" monitor behind us. Guy working the booth was laughing his butt off.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 8:33 am
Posted by CHEDBALLZ
South Central LA
Member since Dec 2009
21909 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:43 am to
As don't there is anything posted making it a gun free zone. I would say yes, you can conceal carry with a permit.
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
4644 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:53 am to
quote:

I don't think so. Its on public property. And it isn't intrusive. So if it worked it would probably be allowed. But again...I would highly doubt it works worth a damn.


I think it violates a reasonable expectation of privacy and circumvents Terry v. Ohio.

I think they're within the bounds of the law if the police can articulate reasonable suspicion that a person has committed/is committing/is about to commit a crime, and then use the camera to individually target that person and look for a weapon. At that point it's basically a technologically more advanced pat down.

Without reasonable suspicion, they are essentially patting down entire crowds carte blanche when people in public have a reasonable expectation of privacy that items concealed by clothing aren't visible to the public eye. If that usage leads to stop and frisks by officers on the street, i.e. "we saw on camera that he may be concealing a gun so we stopped him to check it out" absent any other reason for a stop and any other reasonable suspicion that the stopped person may be armed, then I would expect the city to be sued over the cameras fairly quickly.




Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
5084 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 7:32 am to
Ok, assuming it will pick up guns when in holsters next to the body but will it pick up guns in women's purses, shoulder holster under an arm, or a pocket gun? Just how effective do they think these will be.
Posted by prostyleoffensetime
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2009
11415 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 8:43 am to
quote:

quote:

final version of the proposal, which also calls for making much of Bourbon Street a pedestrian mall.
How in the hell is this to work?


It already is... Just not a clothing, shoes, and home decor type mall... More of a hookers, blow, lap dance, and alcohol type mall.
Posted by prostyleoffensetime
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2009
11415 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 8:43 am to
eta: double post
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 8:53 am
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48930 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 8:45 am to
They're gonna have a lot of false positives outside the strip clubs


LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram