- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If an "assault weapons ban" goes back into play
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:16 am
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:16 am
If an "assault weapons ban" goes back into play such as back in the 90s, would the existing owners be ok?
How will this work?
Would it just be no new items on the so called banned list would be for sale?
All depends on what laws if any are pushed through. But was just curious about all the exiting firearms based on example from the past ban
How will this work?
Would it just be no new items on the so called banned list would be for sale?
All depends on what laws if any are pushed through. But was just curious about all the exiting firearms based on example from the past ban
9
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:19 am to Crawdaddy
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/14/16 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:21 am to cajun12
quote:
"Assault weapons" are already banned.
Are you referring to full auto? You can buy a full auto if you have the coin and proper paperwork.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:24 am to cajun12
quote:
"Assault weapons" are already banned.
They are not "banned". They are heavily regulated by the NFA act of 1934.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:24 am to jdavid1
I'm going by the terms they use.
You know. Scary adjustable butt stocks. Pistol grips. High cap magazines. Etc
Like the ban in the 90s. They use the term assault weapons.
This is not a debate about full auto
You know. Scary adjustable butt stocks. Pistol grips. High cap magazines. Etc
Like the ban in the 90s. They use the term assault weapons.
This is not a debate about full auto
This post was edited on 7/5/16 at 11:25 am
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:26 am to cajun12
quote:Not true at all.
"Assault weapons" are already banned.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:27 am to Crawdaddy
I don't think they could ever flat out ban possession of the semi auto AR15. There are too many out there, and it would end up being a political nightmare. Now I do think they could ban the sale of them while having already owned guns grandfathered. Similar to the previous assault weapon ban.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:29 am to jdavid1
That is what I was thinking as well. Just stop all future sales that may include whatever they decide to ban.
So I guess there will be another buying frenzy if Clinton wins
So I guess there will be another buying frenzy if Clinton wins
This post was edited on 7/5/16 at 11:30 am
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:32 am to Crawdaddy
In the 90s, I think all existing guns were grandfathered. No new production/sales
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:32 am to cajun12
quote:
"Assault weapons" are already banned.
Now if they try to ban all semi auto weapons, that's a whole other ballgame that will never happen
Are you familiar with the 1994 Assault weapons ban?
As to the OP, more than likely if passed similarly again, you will be good to go. However, they are really making a push for not even grandfathering in like the previous AWB or like a few states are doing, requiring a permit to retain ownership.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:35 am to Crawdaddy
It would be very difficult for anyone to track down.
The only information the govt knows from a 4473 is that you bought a "long gun"
That could be anything from a .22 single shot to an AK-47
The model and serial number are filled out on the form, but the feds would have to pull paperwork from every gun dealer in the country to make a database.
The only information the govt knows from a 4473 is that you bought a "long gun"
That could be anything from a .22 single shot to an AK-47
The model and serial number are filled out on the form, but the feds would have to pull paperwork from every gun dealer in the country to make a database.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:36 am to NYCAuburn
Future sales of what ever they decide to ban will stop. That's a Givin. The existing ownership is what is concerning. The AR ownership in the 90s is nothing like it is now.
Yes. The govt does not know what you have for say. But getting pulled over or goin out in public with a so called banned device is a different story
I worry there will be new paper work to fill out for your existing items and money to process those forms. If not filled out then fines if caught. This is what worries me
Yes. The govt does not know what you have for say. But getting pulled over or goin out in public with a so called banned device is a different story
I worry there will be new paper work to fill out for your existing items and money to process those forms. If not filled out then fines if caught. This is what worries me
This post was edited on 7/5/16 at 11:40 am
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:49 am to Crawdaddy
If you want an "assault weapon" I would definitely get it soon. The longer you wait the higher the prices will be, along with related magazines and ammo.
Speaking of ammo- I've used Golden Tiger ammo on my Yugo NPAP AK47. Are there any brands that are good and less expensive?
Speaking of ammo- I've used Golden Tiger ammo on my Yugo NPAP AK47. Are there any brands that are good and less expensive?
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:52 am to Crawdaddy
I think a few people didn't really understand OP.
Probably
They would probably use the last ban as a blueprint but add on new products such as the stabilizing brace and different ammunitions I would GUESS
I'm not sure what you mean?
quote:
would the existing owners be ok?
Probably
quote:
How will this work?
They would probably use the last ban as a blueprint but add on new products such as the stabilizing brace and different ammunitions I would GUESS
quote:
Would it just be no new items on the so called banned list would be for sale
I'm not sure what you mean?
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:54 am to Crawdaddy
Post-Heller, another AWB will probably not survive challenge in court.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 12:14 pm to cajun12
after the great new olreans gun grab after Katrina... when law abiding citizens needed firearms the most......
big brother came and took them........
ever since then, my simple belief is...
whatever they want - they will do
big brother came and took them........
ever since then, my simple belief is...
whatever they want - they will do
Posted on 7/5/16 at 12:28 pm to choupiquesushi
Posted on 7/5/16 at 12:28 pm to Clames
quote:
Post-Heller, another AWB will probably not survive challenge in court.
SCOTUS is about to take a swing to the left.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 12:31 pm to Clames
quote:Trust but verify..... haven't had a chance to play that game again......yet
Those incidents resulted in a new state law and a matching Federal law.
LINK
Posted on 7/5/16 at 12:37 pm to lsufan1971
It was held up 8-0 post Scalia in Caetano v Massachusetts. No new justice will change that.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News