- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Any of you knuckle draggers ever built your own generator?
Posted on 9/21/17 at 11:20 pm to td1
Posted on 9/21/17 at 11:20 pm to td1
quote:This is how I'd do it, but you can get full sized car batteries for like $50
Another route you could take is a decent 12V battery bank (like 4 6V golf cart batteries wired series, series, parallel) and some heavy duty truck alternators run off the water wheel to keep them charged / supply power to an inverter.
Go get the alternator or alternators from a junkyard. A new 200a alternator will be too expensive. Typical car ones run from 50-90a. Truck ones are usually 90-120a, and 3/4 and 1-ton truck ones are around 140a
Eta: Grab a couple of scrap pulleys or a tensioner pulley to keep slight tension on the belts. That will be a lot easier than trying to pull the alternator by hand to get the belt tight enough
This post was edited on 9/22/17 at 2:27 am
Posted on 9/22/17 at 1:35 am to auggie
sorry my man, but you will not be turning the wheel with that much resistance at any type of speed.
More like one 50 amp is going to be ambitious, JMHO
More like one 50 amp is going to be ambitious, JMHO
Posted on 9/22/17 at 7:37 am to Hammertime
A co worker has a windmill that he made at his dads barn/camp. He uses a windmill (blades purchased online) an alternator from a Chevrolet truck, battery bank, and an inverter. He runs all the lights in the barn and a couple fans.
Lots of info on the web of DIY windmills.
Lots of info on the web of DIY windmills.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 10:09 am to auggie
quote:
Somebody said I might have to have the alternators rewound to produce at lower speeds. I don't know,and any help/suggestions would be appreciated.
Have the water wheel turn planetary gears, that will up the speed considerably.
Epicyclic gearing
Posted on 9/22/17 at 11:19 am to Vdrine
You're over complicating it. A bigger drive wheel is all that's needed
Posted on 9/22/17 at 6:45 pm to Hammertime
quote:
You're over complicating it.
I agree,for my situation,the more complicated you make it,the more power loss due to friction and added weight that must be turned.
If you had a really big stream though,and could run a huge waterwheel,setting it up through a manual transmission with over drive might work pretty well.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 7:11 pm to auggie
Just run pulley to pulley and use the KISS method. I honestly don't know enough about electronics, but I'd assume there is a minimum rotational speed for an alternator to work. Some cars idle as low as 500rpm, so you'd need twice the size big pulley to run at 250rpm, 8x running at 62.5 rpm. You'd need the stream to be running at 4.36mph to do that (based off of my phone calculations with a 2" alternator pulley)
Posted on 9/22/17 at 7:19 pm to Hammertime
Yeah, that's what I intend to do,but if I had a bigger creek,I would probably do a setup using a transmission,or something along that route.
I am probably going to use an alternator off of a semi, I have some of those around on junk trucks,and they make a bit of power at 500 rpm.
I am probably going to use an alternator off of a semi, I have some of those around on junk trucks,and they make a bit of power at 500 rpm.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 7:31 pm to auggie
The only problem I can forsee with those is the alternator's pulley size. Smaller = better on that end. Bigger = better on the other end
Posted on 9/22/17 at 7:39 pm to Hammertime
there is a point though,where you have to settle.
If you make the ratio too high,it will probably stall the waterwheel,or the belt will just slip.Make it too low,it won't spin fast enough.
It's going to take experimentation,that's for sure.
If you make the ratio too high,it will probably stall the waterwheel,or the belt will just slip.Make it too low,it won't spin fast enough.
It's going to take experimentation,that's for sure.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 9:58 pm to Hammertime
quote:
A bigger drive wheel is all that's needed
What? The drive wheel can only turn as fast as as what's driving it. If the water wheel is turning at 100 rpm the output shaft will turn at 100 rpm irregardless of the drive wheel size.
The person I replied to was concerned about the speed that the alternators would be operating at wouldn't be enough, I gave them a way to increase the speed that the alternators will spin.
Posted on 9/22/17 at 11:11 pm to Vdrine
quote:
If the water wheel is turning at 100 rpm
If it is turning at 100RPM you better have more than a cable spool with a pipe in the center, that will not last more than a few hours at roughly 2 rev per second, the issue is as things speed up and more draw is applied the alternator becomes much harder to spin. It is going to take roughly 1 hp/kw allowing for friction loss and that is quite a bit of resistance. At some point as resistance increases water just starts to spill over the wheel.
My actual expectation would be roughly 7-10 amps regardless of alternator size as this really has a negligable effect on resistance, if using it to charge batteries for limited occasional use it will be ok, constant power is going to be a dissapointment.
I built one on the outflow of a spring fed pond for shits and giggles and these were my findings, take it for what it is worth.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 2:26 am to Vdrine
We must be talking about different things. I'm talking about the water flow turning a wheel with a large pulley attached. That pulley will be connected to an alternator with a belt. Really basic. It can be built in a day. The more parts you have, the more that can fail, and the more power loss you'll have.
Planetary gears are almost as hard as helical gears to set up, and fail more frequently
Planetary gears are almost as hard as helical gears to set up, and fail more frequently
Posted on 9/23/17 at 11:23 am to Hammertime
I think a true water wheel gets much of it's power more from the weight of the water, rather than just the force created by the flow of the water against the vanes. A turbine works on flow but it takes a significant amount of flow to generate enough hp to power a generator of any size. But a water wheel uses a change in elevation, coupled with the weight of the water in the buckets and the pressure of the flow to create the energy needed. The result is a low speed, high torque main gear or pulley that will turn a small gear at high speed to power the generator. If you don't have a change in elevation available to incorporate into the design, it's hard to do. You want the wheel to be as light as possible so you don't use too much hp just to turn the weight of the wheel. Then maximize the volume of the buckets, and the diameter of the wheel to increase the force generated by the weight of the water. It shouldn't be built like a paddle wheel, simply with vanes perpendicular to the axle unless you have a really high rate of flow. The old time water wheels I've seen were built so that the vanes formed long rectangular buckets.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 12:03 pm to cave canem
Hell 10 amps is usable.
Very cool that you actually did it.
Very cool that you actually did it.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 1:25 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
In my opinion your best bet is to utilize a battery bank and then an inverter.
Posted on 9/23/17 at 4:38 pm to Tigerhead
I may have gotten a good idea today. Instead of using a wheel maybe use a lightweight conveyor,with water pans attached to the belt. The top roller turning a lightweight drive shaft.
This might allow for more of a straight down fall,at a greater vertical distance,and maybe have 3 full pans pushing downward at all times.
Also thought about a kind of reverse line shaft turbine pump using boat props staggered on a shaft,inside of a pipe. I guess you might also call it a reverse Archimedes screw.
This might allow for more of a straight down fall,at a greater vertical distance,and maybe have 3 full pans pushing downward at all times.
Also thought about a kind of reverse line shaft turbine pump using boat props staggered on a shaft,inside of a pipe. I guess you might also call it a reverse Archimedes screw.
This post was edited on 9/23/17 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 9/23/17 at 8:36 pm to auggie
The water wheel is probably going to be the most efficient. The bucket conveyor is essentially a flattened out water wheel. But the round configuration of the water wheel is more efficient because you also get a fly wheel effect. A conveyor design would have to have rollers on each end the size of water wheels to be as mechanically efficient as the ww, if you get my drift. I don't think the conveyor configuration, although more compact, gives you the same mechanical advantage. Remember, you're wanting a large diameter gear or pulley driving a small diameter gear or pulley to boost the rpms at your generator. Where do you put the large gear on a conveyor?
Your turbine idea will work if you have a very large volume of water, moving at high velocity through a choke point. Otherwise you will lose too much of the potential energy. The blades of boat props are too far apart. Even a four blade prop. The water will mostly flow around the blades rather than being forced against the blades. Turbine blades have way more surface area and tighter bypass areas compared to a boat prop.
The old timers were no dummies. They were awesome engineers when it came to making do with the resources they had available, and to my knowledge, almost always used the water wheel as opposed to other water driven devices.
Your turbine idea will work if you have a very large volume of water, moving at high velocity through a choke point. Otherwise you will lose too much of the potential energy. The blades of boat props are too far apart. Even a four blade prop. The water will mostly flow around the blades rather than being forced against the blades. Turbine blades have way more surface area and tighter bypass areas compared to a boat prop.
The old timers were no dummies. They were awesome engineers when it came to making do with the resources they had available, and to my knowledge, almost always used the water wheel as opposed to other water driven devices.
This post was edited on 9/23/17 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 9/23/17 at 8:44 pm to Tigerhead
You know though,back in the old days,they had an unlimited supply of labor. They built what they knew would work.
I will have myself, and some rented equipment. I need to do the most with the least.
I don't get your thinking about the end rollers of the conveyor needing to be large, they would pretty much be idlers/tensioners. The belt length itself would = the outside circumference of a huge wheel. It's just an altered configuration,and easier to position.
I will have myself, and some rented equipment. I need to do the most with the least.
I don't get your thinking about the end rollers of the conveyor needing to be large, they would pretty much be idlers/tensioners. The belt length itself would = the outside circumference of a huge wheel. It's just an altered configuration,and easier to position.
This post was edited on 9/23/17 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 9/23/17 at 9:14 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Hell 10 amps is usable.
Very cool that you actually did it.
It certianly was not cost or time effective.
My original goal was to produce enough power to run a fountain/aerator but I fell woefully short.
To the OP, I am going to recomend you find something with a bearing, I used a trailer axel cut down to size, to reduce friction loss and build your wheel as large a diameter as possible. You are correct it is the weight of the water that provides the majority of the drive power and the larger the wheel/fall the more power you can make. You will need to sort out bucket placement as more/closer is better but too close and they will not fill correctly, this is flow dependant as well.
Edit to add: I considered the below and likely would have benefited from a reverse wheel with a tailrace as pictured below, not enough benefit to redo it but if I was starting from scratch I would consider it.
This post was edited on 9/23/17 at 9:25 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News