Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Amberjack Opens this weekend

Posted on 7/30/15 at 6:32 am
Posted by Elusiveporpi
Below I-10
Member since Feb 2011
2573 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 6:32 am
At what depth can you start seeing amberjack at? Any other species start showing up at the same depth. Looking to make a trip Sunday.
Also, has anyone been stopped by the law out of fourchon/grand isle lately checking for the endangered redsnapper? and was it Feds or State?
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48928 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 6:46 am to
I've seen them at < 100' rigs a few times. It can be hit or miss though


I'd suggest 150'+
Posted by Elusiveporpi
Below I-10
Member since Feb 2011
2573 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 7:36 am to
150 is what i was thinking as well. Should I fish higher in the water column for them? or on the bottom?
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24949 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 9:34 am to
I would start mid water column with jigs and or live bait and starting at 150 ft water depth is solid advice. Hooking up to a decent amberjack will definitely separate the men from the boys them bastards fight with a vengeance. I wouldn't be surprised to find more endangered red snapper than amberjack at most rigs.
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24949 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 9:37 am to
Is it still one per person @ 30" or did it go to the proposed 34"? I am hoping to get out there and catch some soon as well. The wife has me going to the beach this weekend though
Posted by Elusiveporpi
Below I-10
Member since Feb 2011
2573 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 10:59 am to
Im not sure on the size limit is, but I've boated some 80+ ones and your right, man they fight. They just didn't taste worth a dam to me. I hear the smaller ones cook alot better.
Posted by NOLAGT
Over there
Member since Dec 2012
13501 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 11:00 am to
I love them on the grill but they were smaller like 30-40 or so. Never ate a large one
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24949 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 1:07 pm to
Same here as I have never caught an AJ over about 35 lbs. The ones I have had were great cut into steaks and grilled.
Posted by MWP
Kingwood, TX via Monroe, LA
Member since Jul 2013
10400 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

I'd suggest 150'+


That's about where we start finding them out of Freeport. Do better catching them on structure like a wreck, than at the rigs. What's kind of odd is that they will sometime stack up further up the water column though. I guess to make room for the endangered Red Snapper below them. We have caught them at like 50' to 75' which means that you don't get the benefit of them slacking off with their air bladder expanding coming up.

At that depth, 1 AJ is all I want to frick with.
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
17314 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't be surprised to find more endangered red snapper than amberjack at most rigs.




Keeping them off your hook will be tougher than finding AJs. I would head to deeper water for just this reason.
Posted by Elusiveporpi
Below I-10
Member since Feb 2011
2573 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

I suggest to make room for the endangered Red Snapper below them.


I like the way you think.


And thats a good point about the wrecks instead of rigs, that way the reds dont have structure high in the water column where the jack's like to stay.

I remember fishing in about 300+ and we caught a 20" blue runner, backed up to the rig, sent him down for 35 seconds with 24 oz of lead, wait about 15 seconds, hook a AJ, and pin the boat in forward to pull the fish out. But that was with some serious equipment that JJ Tabor had. Let the boat do the fighting.

Its totally different when you go out there with stand up equipment and your own less than nice gear
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48928 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

150 is what i was thinking as well. Should I fish higher in the water column for them? or on the bottom?

if you just want some AJ for meat and a fun fight. Tie on a diamond jig, let it sink 120' or so and get at it. Shouldn't take long. But make sure someone is on the controls to pull yall from the rig



ETA: This will help you not have to deal with the red snapper as much

ETA2: Snapper are usually lower in the water column (to start out) than AJ
This post was edited on 7/30/15 at 3:14 pm
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24949 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 3:22 pm to
Hell during the one weekend of fed snapper season them bastards were so thick that the snapper were blowing up the surface. Caught all my snapper on an anteater butterfly jig. THis was in the South Timb. 160 block 130 feet of water.
Posted by mack the knife
EBR
Member since Oct 2012
4183 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 3:25 pm to
try using hard tail with the tail still on. i've always caught bigger AJ's this way. cutting the tail off seems to get more snapper bites.
Posted by The Last Coco
On the water
Member since Mar 2009
6840 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

try using hard tail with the tail still on. i've always caught bigger AJ's this way. cutting the tail off seems to get more snapper bites.


And use the biggest hardtail you can find. The tuna-size hardtails are snacks for 15# snapper. I go for the 20-24" hardtails if I can catch them.
Posted by Capt ST
Hotel California
Member since Aug 2011
12804 posts
Posted on 7/30/15 at 3:51 pm to
If a snapper eats one of the baits I'm dropping down Saturday, she's getting a ride back to pirates cove
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram