Started By
Message

US Navy's new destroyer is impressive

Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:19 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64597 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:19 pm
It's so stealthy they're having to fit it with reflectors so other ships can spot it during sea trials....

quote:

The future USS Zumwalt is so stealthy that it'll go to sea with reflective material that can be hoisted to make it more visible to other ships. The Navy destroyer is designed to look like a much smaller vessel on radar, and it lived up to its billing during recent builder trials. Lawrence Pye, a lobsterman, told The Associated Press that on his radar screen the 610-foot ship looked like a 40- to 50-foot fishing boat.












LINK
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59672 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:20 pm to
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38741 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:21 pm to
I'm all about being a patriot, but that shite looks stupid.
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:23 pm to
Just from looking at it, though, it resembles the angles of the stealth bomber and in one of the pictures it also resembles blending in with the landscape...like it could look like an island from afar.
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
108745 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:23 pm to
It's odd seeing a ship with no railings or visible mooring equipment (capstan, cleats, etc). Looks like everything is contained under the top deck and accessed through portholes.

I'm wondering if the crew is allowed anywhere topside while at sea?

Would definitely like to tour the ship and learn more about the day-to-day shite.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

USS Zumwalt

I wonder how many of the sailors call it the USS Kumquat
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101920 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:23 pm to
And I'm all about respecting other people's opinions, but yours is shite.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:23 pm to
ole Johnny Reb was onto something .....

Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58082 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:24 pm to
isnt this the one that everyone thought would have issues rolling over in rough seas?
Posted by sneakytiger
Member since Oct 2007
2473 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I'm wondering if the crew is allowed anywhere topside while at sea?


Probably was designed to have a crew of like 3
Posted by Artie Rome
Hwy 1
Member since Jul 2014
8757 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:25 pm to
If by impressive you mean a total waste of money, I agree.
Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90534 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

but that shite looks stupid.


Hmm. I think it looks awesome.


Terd, agree. Would be cool to take a tour of it. See the areas you would have had butt sex in...
Posted by makinskrilla
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jun 2009
9727 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:27 pm to
There's a badass book called ghost fleet about this ship set in the future.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113964 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

If by impressive you mean a total waste of money, I agree.


Explain
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
108745 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

See the areas you would have had butt sex in...


Surface ship, breh. That means 10 guys sharing 1 lady. Butt sex was a submarines thing.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21848 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:28 pm to
Posted by parrotdr
Cesspool of Rationalization
Member since Oct 2003
7512 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:29 pm to
It's "too stealthy".

quote:

That’s why the United States Navy plans to affix huge reflectors onto the USS Zumwalt to avoid wreaking havoc on local mariners, which makes sense since this ship is about 50 times more stealthy than current destroyers.


Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134865 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:29 pm to
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
108745 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:29 pm to
quote:


Probably was designed to have a crew of like 3


Around 140... the previous Arleigh Burke class destroyers are around 300.
Posted by Artie Rome
Hwy 1
Member since Jul 2014
8757 posts
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:30 pm to
No. You explain the cost/benefit of that monster. with the state of warfare, how is that justifiable?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram