Started By
Message

re: The 35 most powerful militaries in the world

Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:07 am to
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22273 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 3:07 am to
They're obviously including sandwiches.
Posted by CajunAlum Tiger Fan
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
7871 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 5:26 am to
quote:


Um, South Korea may have double the North's population but, other than that, the North has pretty much all other advantages in a head-to-head match-up.


Except the good ole USA.
Posted by cjared036
Houston, tx
Member since Dec 2009
9569 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 6:21 am to
Except of course that most Nk'ers would probably defect once they got inside SK borders.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 6:24 am to
quote:

Russia can have all those tanks lol.. stuck in 1940. Airplanes and Aircraft carriers is how the new war will be fought..


Id rather have tanks when invading Europe and the middle east.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 6:32 am to
quote:

Meh, according to that we only spend like $4000 per troop per year. That is peanuts, especially since China only spends $168 per troop. That infographic is totally real. 100%. We should all share it by email and post it to Facebook.
u dum bruh
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:08 am to
quote:

Russia can have all those tanks lol.. stuck in 1940. Airplanes and Aircraft carriers is how the new war will be fought..




LOL. There were people saying the exact same thing in the 20s and 30s. They were wrong then and you are wrong now.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52967 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:08 am to
quote:

The new war is cyber war and none of those "things" mean shite.


thank god we have anonymous on our side
Posted by chesty
Flap City C.C.
Member since Oct 2012
12731 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:12 am to
Maybe
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68299 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Russia can have all those tanks lol.. stuck in 1940. Airplanes and Aircraft carriers is how the new war will be fought.. 



LOL. There were people saying the exact same thing in the 20s and 30s. They were wrong then and you are wrong now. 


well the thing is russian tanks are still way outdated. an old arse A-10 could take out as many as its ammo allowed.

and the nukes? our star wars program has that under wraps
Posted by StarkRebel
Member since Sep 2014
2175 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:35 am to
Murica Stacked..........Rest of the World Fukkkkkkkeeeeddddd
Posted by Spunky
Member since Mar 2013
10020 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:49 am to
quote:

lsu480




Do you enjoy being as big of a count as TH03?
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Do you enjoy being as big of a count as TH03?

I feel like this is a new schtick for 480.
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11651 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 7:58 am to
Seriously, is it necessary to have ~7,000 nukes? What's the point?
Posted by SthGADawg
Member since Nov 2007
7035 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Seriously, is it necessary to have ~7,000 nukes? What's the point?


Deterrence



Posted by tke857
Member since Jan 2012
12195 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 8:15 am to
man power prob equals if we needed to do draft how many ppl we could potentially have.....bc i cant see how we have 145million currently
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 8:26 am to
[quote]The new war is cyber war and none of those "things" [link\]LINK we gotta do is push a button.[/link]
This post was edited on 3/2/15 at 8:28 am
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 8:30 am to
quote:

well the thing is russian tanks are still way outdated. an old arse A-10 could take out as many as its ammo allowed.



The Abrams, Challenger II (British), and Leopard II (German) are all still the world's best tanks. But the Russians have a very modern and capable tank of their own in the T-90AM



And even the T90A is still a very dangerous tank to go up against.




Don't let the fact that it looks a lot like the old T-64 and T-72 fool you, the T-90 is a totally new and very modern main battle tank.

LINK
This post was edited on 3/2/15 at 8:35 am
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39994 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 8:58 am to
How is Switzerland ranked above Spain?
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 9:01 am to
quote:

The EMT-7 electromagnetic pulse (EMP) creator has been used in testing but not fitted to T-90s in active service.


Awesome.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 9:07 am to
quote:

How is Switzerland ranked above Spain?


Because the Swiss have long been known as someone you don't want to frick with. Even when Hitler overran almost all of Europe, he didn't mess with Switzerland.



(And in case anyone is wondering, the only reason Germany did not overrun Spain is they were an ally of the Germans. And even though Spain was on the surface "neutral", they actually sent a force of "volunteers" to the Eastern Front to fight alongside the Germans against the Soviets.)

Blue Division

(Note the red & yellow Spanish crest on the RH side of the Stahlhelm where the red, white & black German crest is normally located)
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram