Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

#StopSnitching: Police Edition

Posted on 5/24/15 at 11:26 am
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 11:26 am
There was a huge outcry when the #stopsnitching campaign was popular. Police claim it impedes them from solving crimes and serving the community. That being said, when was the last time a law enforcement officer stepped from being the blue shield to speak out against corruption and impropriety in their departments?

To go a step further, whenever an office does step from behind the shield his life is made hell often with management approval. This is despite there being laws against harressment and whistleblower protections. Do these policies not apply to law enforcement?

The police mentality is in no way different from that of most street gangs. When will the "good" cops speak out against the bad seeds? When will the public demand more accountability?
This post was edited on 5/24/15 at 11:40 am
Posted by northLAgoomba
The Cooper Road, Ratchet City, LA
Member since Nov 2009
3792 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 11:33 am to
quote:

when was the last time a law enforcement officer stepped from being the blue shield to speak out against corruption and impropriety in their departments?

Probably this guy ....
Posted by EddieHewitt
LOUISIANA
Member since Oct 2013
1392 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 11:36 am to
Laws don't pertain to police and neither do their policies baw.
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
32426 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 11:37 am to
Somebody should shoot you for that baw shite... so gay.
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 11:42 am to
Most major companies, organizations, ect have "anonymous" hotlines that people can call to report misdeeds. These lines are usually managed by an outside agency to avoid a conflict of interest. I know government agencies have them. Are they not available to police?
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10445 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 11:47 am to
Who downvoted the OP and why?

Man enough to defend it?
Posted by Anonymous95
Member since Sep 2014
2076 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Who downvoted the OP...


I wouldn't take that too seriously. Someone down voted a blobfish last week.

Posted by Anonymous95
Member since Sep 2014
2076 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:14 pm to
Damnit.
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:14 pm to
Great post, you got an upvote from me
Posted by blue_morrison
Member since Jan 2013
5128 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:28 pm to
You sound like you browse reddit often.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14962 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Who downvoted the OP and why?

Man enough to defend it?


I did not, but my guess is because the OP is an opinion piece based on assumption and speculation with zero fact or substance referenced. While it's entirely possible that it's true, it's very easy to disregard entirely should you want to believe something else. I'd wager those people either believe something else or dislike speculation, but that's just me speculating.
Posted by EddieHewitt
LOUISIANA
Member since Oct 2013
1392 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 12:52 pm to
Awwwwwwwwww poor baby BAW!

This post was edited on 5/24/15 at 12:54 pm
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10445 posts
Posted on 5/24/15 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

e, it's very easy to disregard entirely should you want to believe something else.


Yet not one argument was made to refute his claim.

Crickets.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram