- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Six Years Ago Today: Deepwater Horizon Explodes
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:58 am to Topwater Trout
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:58 am to Topwater Trout
But by all means, keep making light of this unforgivable act
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:58 am to slackster
quote:Yea but the precious port of Nola wouldnt exist if we were to let the River change course.
The culprit for the erosion is the flood control structures that have been in place for 100 years on the Mississippi River. It really isn't deniable.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:59 am to AU_251
quote:
But by all means, keep making light of this unforgivable act
How is suggesting the ecosystem may not be as fragile as some people think making light?
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:59 am to polizei11
quote:
I would love to see a well that is capable of making "millions of barrels a day".
Yea, i got that. I quoted the article to show the true numbers, cuz nobody had it right, including myself
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:00 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
LNCHBOX is a derp. He showed it off yesterday in the tiger attack thread. No need to even engage him.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 9:01 am
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:00 am to AU_251
quote:
keep making light of this unforgivable act
how am I making light of it? Do I have to be a drama queen and conclude that it has killed an entire ecosystem when I have been out there and not seen a desolate wasteland with no animal life?
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:01 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
I fish just to the east of there. I have seen lots of changes in that time.
Added land or loss of land?
The most basic geographical understanding makes it evident that river deltas are where land grows. When you're forcing 800,000 CF/S of water discharge into 100m+ depths instead of depths of 20-30 feet, this is what happens. It isn't rocket science.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:01 am to AU_251
That's about the kind of response I'd expect for you.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:01 am to Topwater Trout
Just because I replied to you doesn't mean I was speaking only to you. Yours was just the closest button.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:02 am to AU_251
quote:
Just because I replied to you doesn't mean I was speaking only to you
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:03 am to AU_251
Ignorance is always entertaining
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:11 am to slackster
quote:both of us are on the same page, but to divert this sedimentary flow, sacrifices in the shipping industry would have to be made.
Added land or loss of land?
The most basic geographical understanding makes it evident that river deltas are where land grows. When you're forcing 800,000 CF/S of water discharge into 100m+ depths instead of depths of 20-30 feet, this is what happens. It isn't rocket science.
you know they constantly are pumping out the channels in the mouth of the river, right? because it is filling itself in, yet the ships have to come and go.
The problem isnt as simple as people think. Let the river flow and do what is is supposed to do, say good bye to one of the busiest navigational rivers in the world, Say good buy to all the port cities up and down the river.....Invest in trucking companies cause they are gonna explode.
Diversions are the "fix" for right now. but with those you also have plenty of issues. A Funny one i always laugh at are the oyster fisherman who bitch because it will put an influx of fresh water into their oysterbeds. It is Funny because the same people bitching about coastal eroison are the ones who dont want the land filled back in cause they is where their lively hood is. There were no oysters being farmed there 20-30-40-50 years ago. they are there now because of the saltwater intrusion
/rant
.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 9:13 am
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:15 am to slackster
quote:
Added land or loss of land?
loss. I go through Lake Mechant and Sister lake to get to the gulf and there are islands gone from those lakes. The cut at the gulf used to be maybe 40-50 yards wide and now its a few hundred yards wide.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:15 am to AU_251
Your point would have been better received if you had not climbed the highest peak available to go over the top. That and at least having your facts straight.
Try less drama and more substance next time.
Try less drama and more substance next time.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:18 am to redstick13
What was over the top? I quoted an article and put some pics in there
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:18 am to redstick13
quote:
more substance next time
A few of you, including yourself, could benefit from this
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:19 am to mylsuhat
Since the Deepwater Horizon incident, oil companies who operate in deepwater and BSEE have put a lot of safety systems, controls, and drills in place to ensure that if there is a similar type incident the response will be much more timely and effective. While tragic, the incident opened up a lot of peoples eyes which will hopefully prevent something this devastating from happening again in the US gulf.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:20 am to AU_251
quote:
A few of you, including yourself, could benefit from this
So because you posted drivel full of hyperbole and people called you out on it, you want to blame people other than yourself?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News