- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Shreveport PD makes first arrest under new 'revenge porn' law
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:17 pm
It's a woman of all people...
But wait, what was that last part?
That seems like a pretty broad scope. What exactly is or isn't a "private" photo?
quote:
SHREVEPORT, La. -Revenge is sweet or so the saying goes. Now revenge could mean jail time.
“These images were never intended to be made public,” Corporal Marcus Hines said.
Hines, with the Shreveport Police Department, is talking about naked photos posted on Facebook by Krystal Holmes, 28. Holmes was arrested Friday and charged with four counts of nonconsensual disclosure of a private image.
But wait, what was that last part?
quote:
“This is a very new law,” Cpl. Hines said. “This enacted in 2015.”
Proposed by Representative Julie Stokes, House Bill 489 passed legislation this past Spring.
Starting August 1st, it became illegal to make private photos, public, without consent.
That seems like a pretty broad scope. What exactly is or isn't a "private" photo?
13
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:20 pm to Clyde Tipton
well, there goes the amateur porn industry.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:22 pm to Clyde Tipton
too many laws. geez
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:26 pm to Clyde Tipton
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:27 pm to Polar Pop
Woof
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:32 pm to Clyde Tipton
Text of the bill
"Intimate parts" have to be exposed for it to qualify as a crime, intimate parts meaning exactly what you'd expect it to mean under the circumstances.
"Intimate parts" have to be exposed for it to qualify as a crime, intimate parts meaning exactly what you'd expect it to mean under the circumstances.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:34 pm to upgrayedd
IWHI again and again and again. Again.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:35 pm to Clyde Tipton
The blurred images they were showing were of another (?) woman.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:42 pm to Clyde Tipton
quote:This is good to know if anyone has crazy ex's...
Starting August 1st, it became illegal to make private photos, public, without consent.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:45 pm to upgrayedd
I think those pics should definitely be kept from public viewing.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 4:47 pm to Clyde Tipton
the problem is if you send a person a picture, who then owns that picture?
the person you sent it to or the person that took it?
the person you sent it to or the person that took it?
Posted on 11/10/15 at 5:05 pm to Polar Pop
If Pat Summit had a daughter...
Posted on 11/10/15 at 5:09 pm to Clyde Tipton
quote:
Starting August 1st, it became illegal to make private photos, public, without consent.
What if you just sent them to a friend in order to brag with the expressed provision that he not show them to anyone else?
Posted on 11/10/15 at 5:19 pm to John Keating
Her faceface page is public and pure comedy gold
Posted on 11/10/15 at 5:40 pm to Polar Pop
quote:
Her faceface page is public and pure comedy gold
Yes it is.
quote:
Hoes make fake pages just to get an add to my page bitch I'm gonna add sum edges to that slick arse head
Guess I will not be making a fake facebook profile to friend her.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:31 pm to Clyde Tipton
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:35 pm to Clyde Tipton
What is the letter of the law? Once someone sends it, it is no longer private. A private photo or video would be one that was stolen off of someone's device.
How can the receiving party be obligated to not share without paperwork?
Crazy.
How can the receiving party be obligated to not share without paperwork?
Crazy.
This post was edited on 11/10/15 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:38 pm to Clyde Tipton
So under this law if a girl sends a picture of her tits to a guy and he shows it to a buddy, the guy is jail eligible?
This post was edited on 11/10/15 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:56 pm to Scoop
quote:
So under this law if a girl sends a picture of her tits to a guy and he shows it to a buddy, the guy is jail eligible?
I would think not.
First the statute says somebody above just linked says that there must be intent to harass or cause emotional distress to the person in the pic. That would be a tough sell if you just showed a pic to a buddy.
Second: the statute defines disclosure (which must occur for the statute to apply) as:
quote:
"Disclosure" means to, electronically or otherwise, transfer, give, provide, distribute, mail, deliver, circulate, publish on the internet, or disseminate by any means.
In other words possession of the photo would have to change hands. At least that is my take on it.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:06 pm to Clyde Tipton
Don't want to watch the video.
Was the pic she posted of a male or female?
if a male, was it posted for all to see so everyone could see how small it was?
Was the pic she posted of a male or female?
if a male, was it posted for all to see so everyone could see how small it was?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News