Started By
Message

Share of female bachelor's degrees by major 1971 to 2017

Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:32 pm
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61145 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:32 pm
And remember we've poured a shite ton of money to specifically recruit women to stem fields to increase their numbers in both universities and businesses.


Posted by Mahootney
Lovin' My German Footprint
Member since Sep 2008
11873 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:43 pm to
Looks like a decent jump in 1980, then not much else.
Posted by SD Tider
San Diego
Member since May 2019
2500 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:50 pm to
No surprise. Women just typically aren’t very good at engineering. Not all mind you, I work with a couple women who are excellent engineers, but they are very matter-of-fact and don’t seem to give a frick about the silly things most women do.

The others though? They love bitching about the way things SHOULD be done or how nobody does things correctly, but refuse to be a part of any solution or improvement if it requires them doing an ounce of extra work.

In fact, I’ve frequently noticed that whenever there is an unexpected problem (not uncommon in defense industry engineering) and it requires a late night/weekend working session, you will rarely if ever find women willing to roll up their sleeves and work through the issue. It’s always a shrug, some excuse (“I’m meeting my college besty for drinks tonight”) and a cheerful “good luck” as they’re heading out the door.

Nothing pisses me off more than working 18 hour days for weeks on end with other male engineers and then coming in to some slick video posted on our company website about how women are “revolutionizing” STEM.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260167 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:51 pm to
I find it hard to believe only half of sociology majors are female.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34461 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:55 pm to
Wouldn’t the massive increases in architecture, biology and physical science be considered STEM?

Posted by McVick
Member since Jan 2011
4466 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 9:56 pm to
It appears there are some pretty decent gains in biology, business, architecture, and physical sciences. Psychology too.
Posted by WONTONGO
Member since Oct 2007
4296 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 10:00 pm to
Computer Science has dropped since the 80s. That's interesting.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41554 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 10:03 pm to
Women will bitch about “not being equal” (they are) and about the gender rolls inequality (WTF?) but they continue to choose fields that are traditionally seen as female industries.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89493 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

I find it hard to believe only half of sociology majors are female.




I agree that's got to be 3 or 4 to 1, but, History, Economics and even PoliSci have lots of baws, still. That's 4 in that same group.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29150 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Nothing pisses me off more than working 18 hour days for weeks on end with other male engineers and then coming in to some slick video posted on our company website about how women are “revolutionizing” STEM.



Yeah thst would get old. How did it say they are revolutionizing it? I’m sure it’s a lot of nonsense lip service about how diversity does this and that and we all benefit from it but was there anything more specific than that?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73674 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

No surprise. Women just typically aren’t very good at engineering.


On average the female engineers I work with are better than the males. I have come across very few (honestly can't think of any I have personally worked with) female engineers that are complete shite.

Could be because they wash out in college though.
Posted by littlePNdaB
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2010
837 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 10:22 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/5/20 at 10:24 pm
Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3632 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

decent gains in biology


I bet that’s entirely graduate/doctorate level healthcare profession related (Physician, PA, PT, etc).
This post was edited on 1/5/20 at 10:56 pm
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65551 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Wouldn’t the massive increases in architecture, biology and physical science be considered STEM?
I agree with you on this except architecture.

I’m really close to several older architects and they (mostly) have learned whatever technical knowledge they have of the physical properties of materials and engineering through experience rather than any formal academic or continuing education.

The modern architecture academic curriculum is pretty liberal artsy.
Posted by SD Tider
San Diego
Member since May 2019
2500 posts
Posted on 1/5/20 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

Yeah thst would get old. How did it say they are revolutionizing it? I’m sure it’s a lot of nonsense lip service about how diversity does this and that and we all benefit from it but was there anything more specific than that?


Nothing of substance, just a bunch of girl power “women are changing the world” type monologues superimposed over images of chicks in the lab or pointing at some code on a screen, stuff like that.
Posted by Papplesbeast
St. Louis
Member since Dec 2014
826 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:02 am to
quote:

Nothing pisses me off more than working 18 hour days for weeks on end with other male engineers and then coming in to some slick video posted on our company website about how women are “revolutionizing” STEM.

That's worse than dealing with the innumerable stupid decisions made by corporate bureaucrats?
Posted by SD Tider
San Diego
Member since May 2019
2500 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:17 am to
quote:

That's worse than dealing with the innumerable stupid decisions made by corporate bureaucrats?


It was just a figure of speech, obviously there are worse things.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36107 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 12:23 am to
People will probably get lost in specific majors and percentages but I think the take home point most people somehow don't know is roughly 60% of high school graduates and 60% of college graduates are women in the United States.

That's a giant achievement gap that should be a concern for everyone. Not because women are doing well, because it means men are not. Functionally a 40 to 60 ratio shows you that you are 50% more likely to graduate from high school or college if you are born female rather than born male.

There are ways to break down this data further but for most people they tend to obscure the point by noting things like the achievement gap is larger amount some minority groups (black men and hispanic men compared to black women or hispanic women). But the gap is enormous among whites as a whole too. That's a problem period. And the gap is not particularly new, its been there for decades now, it just continues to grow.

A problem for even discussing the issue has been that education fields have been dominated by a view of education that is female centric and tends to be left of center with respect to their targeted groups for special concern (some minorities, almost all women, and other religious or sexual groups are generally considered more in need of interventions or consideration). But even for a purely self interested middle class woman, you ought to be concerned that your brothers and sons are less likely to graduate high school and that you might not be able to find a men educated enough for your desire for social standing to find satisfactory (men will willingly marry less educated women, but women are much more reluctant to do the same).
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68275 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 2:41 am to
yall are saying women engineers but they were 1% in 1970 and >20% now.

I cant do that math but that is a shitload % increase


also, there are now more women graduates per year at lsu med school new orleans than men. women became the majority 3 or 4 years ago
This post was edited on 1/6/20 at 2:42 am
Posted by GoHoGsGo06
Member since Nov 2006
5739 posts
Posted on 1/6/20 at 5:48 am to
quote:


No surprise. Women just typically aren’t very good at engineering.
This is a moronic statement; and is part of the problem woman have with a) getting jobs and b) moving up the ranks.

Everything you said also applies to men.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram