Settle a drunken argument: Tyson vs Bruce Lee no holds barred KO match

Provide solid arguments for your position

Two totally different styles of fighting. Bruce Lee would definitely win, no doubt. You guys must have been drunk to have this argument.

lee,
he has much faster reaction time than tyson and that alone is all you need to win. who cares if you're the strongest if you can't attack your component. Strength
tyson, thats a given, but you must catch the rabbit before you can cook rabbit stew

Where is your solid argument for your position?

My argument is if Tyson gets a few solid shots in, which he would, Lee is done

That's honestly about it

quote:

---

My argument is if Tyson gets a few solid shots in, which he would, Lee is done

---

Tyson wouldn't touch him. Lee was way faster than Tyson in his prime.

20 year old Tyson would absolutely destroy the tv karate man

Tyson and the fight would last about 30 seconds

quote:

---

Bruce Lee was like 115lbs.

---

145 pounds, but he hit like he weighed 200 pounds.

I don't think Tyson is getting enough credit as a street fighter in the thread - he peaked fairly early, physically, which means taking him, you either have to take the fastest, hardest hitting, but dumbest Tyson, or a slightly more experienced, but slower Tyson.

Taking a 28-year old Bruce Lee is the smart play here - he was a brutally well trained and well conditioned athlete - and a genius at unarmed combat.

I say Lee, although it would be a mistake for an opponent to underestimate Mike Tyson at, say, 22, in a fight like this.

quote:

---

tv karate man

---

He wasn't just a TV karate man. He's arguably the greatest martial artist to ever walk the planet. If Tyson could land a punch, he may have a chance. But I don't think he's close to fast enough to touch Lee.