- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scientist says he found definitive proof that God exists
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:53 am to Darth_Vader
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:53 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”, he affirmed. “Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore.”
“To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”
Where does he say God exists? I think that's what people are pointing out. And when you see God. People on here automatically assume they are speaking of Christian beliefs.
When he's just saying a higher power may exist.
That's all, this is not ground breaking.
2
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:54 am to Darth_Vader
interesting, but your title is inaccurate
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:54 am to Displaced
quote:
I link therefore I am.
That's his first meditation. I think he proves God exists on his third, but I might be wrong. It's been awhile and I ain't googling some French fagot.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:54 am to Darth_Vader
All right this mightbe the 10th time this has been pointed out in this thread, but some people are slower than others I guess. I'll bold the key words to help you along.
Misleading title.
Actual content of the article.
Misleading title.
quote:
Scientist says he found definitive proof that God exists.
Actual content of the article.
quote:
The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory that might point to the existence of God.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:55 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”, he affirmed.”
“To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”
I concluded this at the age of ten. To think otherwise is irrational.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:55 am to King George
quote:
quote:
definitive proof
quote:
developed a theory
This sounds familiar somehow, but there are those scientific based mindsets ready to debunk his theory.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:55 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
How is the title manipulative and misleading when the article quotes him saying this?
quote:
definitive proof
quote:
“To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”
quote:
The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:56 am to dgnx6
quote:
when you see God. People on here automatically assume they are speaking of Christian beliefs.
Fail.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:58 am to Sid in Lakeshore
"God" is overwhelmingly used for a singular deity, and more often than not, for the Christian god
to say otherwise is simply being obtuse
to say otherwise is simply being obtuse
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:00 am to dgnx6
quote:
It's all in good fun.
I don't care what you believe. But you can't sit here and say, see, God does exist. Take that atheist.
It's almost as if Christians are just as insecure as the rest if not more.
yeah i'm just poking fun as well. I just like laughing at fanatical atheists because they embody so many things they supposedly abhor about organized religion.
ETA: I am shocked that this thread hasn't got anchored
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 11:08 am
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:04 am to cas4t
quote:
The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory
The article put that in there and to be honest it's a piss poor word to use to describe his thinking here. He never described his findings as a "theory". In fact these words here....
quote:
“To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”
And
quote:
“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”,
... indicate that in his mind this is not a "theory" but rather a matter of fact. No scientist would use words like "To me it is clear" or "I have concluded" to describe something he views as still being only theoretical.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:05 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
To think otherwise is irrational.
To think otherwise is the definition of rational.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:06 am to Darth_Vader
Fortunately, that is not how the scientific process works.
His conclusions do not equal fact.
His conclusions do not equal fact.
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 11:07 am
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:09 am to Darth_Vader
When I was in college (shortly before I met my wife), I mentioned to someone that I wouldn't settle down until I was at least 30 and fully believed it. When we started dating, there were about a dozen really eerie 'coincidences' over the course of a few months that made me believe that she was the one and it would be a long term relationship. Things that individually could be possibly 'by chance' but not collectively. Over the 15 years since then, I still believe there was more to it than just coincidence.
In Drew Brees' book after winning the Super Bowl, he alluded to similar coincidences with his wife although doubt his can compare to mine. The only other explanation with mine is the theory of false memories.
In Drew Brees' book after winning the Super Bowl, he alluded to similar coincidences with his wife although doubt his can compare to mine. The only other explanation with mine is the theory of false memories.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:10 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
No scientist would use words like "To me it is clear" or "I have concluded" to describe something he views as still being only theoretical.
well since "tachyons" have never been proven or found, and these are the things that he bases his entire conclusion off of, I have no idea how he could be so definitive
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:11 am to Displaced
quote:
Fortunately, that is not how the scientific process works.
His conclusions do not equal fact.
True. And that's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is in opinion, it is fact.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:12 am to Argonaut
Bottom-line is that we all have a choice to either believe and have faith or Not to believe. But for those who choose not to believe, You had better be right. And the ones that do believe and try and live that life, if your wrong then you still led a good life. If nothing else the teachings of Jesus and his posse are most certainly a great design for living ,Spiritually.
But I guess we all should seek our own answer to that question of existence.
But I guess we all should seek our own answer to that question of existence.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:13 am to real
quote:
But for those who choose not to believe, You had better be right. And the ones that do believe and try and live that life, if your wrong then you still led a good life
ugh
you better also be right because what if any of the other religions are right?
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:15 am to Darth_Vader
A person would have to be naive to believe that our fine tuned life on Earth is all by chance.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:15 am to Darth_Vader
Those that believe don't need any proof.
Those that need proof will never truly believe.
/Thread
Those that need proof will never truly believe.
/Thread
Page 9 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News