- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scientist says he found definitive proof that God exists
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:17 am to CAD703X
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:17 am to CAD703X
quote:
insecure
The only insecurity here is the "physicist" who is trying to stir controversy in the scientific community with this article. It's the equivalent of a lifted up truck with a pair of truck nuts on the back.
And he's asian, so it makes perfect sense that he's overcompensating for something.
1
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:18 am to Salmon
Yeah, I haven't gotten that at all so far. I'm sure it will get there though.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:19 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Scientist says he found definitive proof that God exists
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:20 am to Displaced
quote:
Yeah, I haven't gotten that at all so far
1 troll = all atheists
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:20 am to Darth_Vader
Simple statistics can show that.
What gets better odds?
That the entire universe, and all of the life that exists (or has existed), is the result of completely random chance?
OR
That the entire universe, and all of the life that exists (or has existed), is the result of the actions of an external actor (God)?
What gets better odds?
That the entire universe, and all of the life that exists (or has existed), is the result of completely random chance?
OR
That the entire universe, and all of the life that exists (or has existed), is the result of the actions of an external actor (God)?
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 10:24 am
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:20 am to DanMullins4Life
quote:
David Hume warned us about these things. Believers and those wimpy agnostics would start infiltrating good atheistic sciences, perverting them for their own agendas.
There's your problem, mate.
All science points to the existence of God. Man wants to be God so bad that he will go out of his way to try to disprove the obvious.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:20 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
Where I part company is the premise that this intelligence is a middle eastern monotheistic deity.
That's perfectly reasonable I suppose. But are you saying there's no chance the this Universal Intelligence" (i.e. God) is a "middle eastern monotheistic deity"? Or do you simply not know?
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:20 am to Salmon
quote:maybe you should debate him on the science, not his conclusion
quote:
“To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”
this doesn't sound like "God" to me
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:20 am to Darth_Vader
Is that Raiden from Mortal Kombat?
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:20 am to CAD703X
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:21 am to Team Vote
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:21 am to CAD703X
quote:
because a belief in a higher power equals that?
If you are Christian. I can believe in a higher power and still think Christians are wrong.
I'm simply pointing out to the Catholics and Protestants that this doesn't mean you haven't been brain washed.
Because no where does this prove that Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior.
The higher power could be a computer, could be an Alien, maybe Allah.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:23 am to Freauxzen
quote:
Honest question, why not?
my gripe was the use of "God"
the title should read "intelligent design"
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:24 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
But are you saying there's no chance the this Universal Intelligence" (i.e. God) is a "middle eastern monotheistic deity"? Or do you simply not know?
Do you know that there is a chance? I think we're making a logical point here. The idea here at the core of this theory doesn't come close to vindicating the man made notions of salvation and the afterlife that are at the core of every organized religion. I can buy this guy's theory, but that doesnt make me any closer to subscribing to any religion.
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 10:26 am
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:24 am to Salmon
quote:
my gripe was the use of "God"
the title should read "intelligent design"
Call it whatever you want.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:24 am to dgnx6
I just wish that this "scientist" would present some honesty to where the evidence leads instead of subscribing to the god of the gaps mentality.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:24 am to dgnx6
quote:
I'm simply pointing out to the Catholics and Protestants that this doesn't mean you haven't been brain washed.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:25 am to Darth_Vader
I don't get how one can use theoretical concepts to reach "definitive" conclusions.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:26 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
definitive proof that God exists
quote:
theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory
quote:Yeah. It's definitive.
might point
But if it really is proof of God, I don't think it's the kind you like, bubba.
Posted on 6/8/16 at 10:28 am to DanMullins4Life
quote:
just wish that this "scientist" would present some honesty to where the evidence leads instead of subscribing to the god of the gaps mentality.
It's just funny they all come running because of "God". All religions believe in some higher being. Because someone says God, doesn't mean the Christian teachings of said God are right.
Page 6 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News