- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NC law: Men Legally Allowed to Finish Sex Even If Woman Revokes Consent
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:14 pm
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:14 pm
Women in North Carolina have been unable to legally revoke consent after sexual intercourse begins.
"North Carolina is the only state in the country where no doesn't really mean no. Right now, if a woman tells a man to stop having sex he is under no legal obligation to do so, as long as she initially consented. If sex turns violent, the woman has no right to tell the man he must stop."
See a non-New Orleans post!
18
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:15 pm to ihometiger
Ok, that's fricked up. However, I wouldn't mind seeing a law that stops chicks from revoking consent days later.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:22 pm to ihometiger
quote:
"If the actual penetration is accomplished with the woman's consent, the accused is not guilty of rape, although he may be guilty of another crime because of his subsequent actions," the High Court wrote.
To know whether or not I should be outraged the writer of the column should have taken the time to research what other crime is committed in this instance. If anyone has ever been charged with that crime...
I feel like she is only giving us just the tip.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:22 pm to ihometiger
So this is why UNC and Duke have blue colors: they take blue balls seriously in that state.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:35 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
"If the actual penetration is accomplished with the woman's consent, the accused is not guilty of rape, although he may be guilty of another crime because of his subsequent actions," the High Court wrote.
To know whether or not I should be outraged the writer of the column should have taken the time to research what other crime is committed in this instance. If anyone has ever been charged with that crime...
That makes a huge difference than the writer or OP suggested . It won't be classified as rape, but possibly assault or kidnapping, whatever
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:36 pm to ihometiger
quote:
If sex turns violent, the woman has no right to tell the man he must stop."
I'm pretty sure that would still be assault maybe just not rape.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:41 pm to ihometiger
I'd be okay then....between initial peneteration and her being able to say no, I'd be done anyways
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:46 pm to ihometiger
What if I pull out and am about to bust a nut and she revokes consent and I can't stop it and I bust a nut all over her after she revoked consent?
What would be the ruling there in the the other 49 states?
What would be the ruling there in the the other 49 states?
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:47 pm to ihometiger
Do they say whether the fricker can be guilty of another crime albeit not rape? IOW, semantics? Like assault/battery for continuing to frick without permission even though not technically rape?
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:49 pm to ihometiger
That's why safe words are so damn important.
All they gotta do is say it and spell it. Is that so hard?
Tchoutacabouffa river
All they gotta do is say it and spell it. Is that so hard?
Tchoutacabouffa river
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:50 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
I'd be okay then....between initial peneteration and her being able to say no, I'd be done anyways
Posted on 6/27/17 at 7:55 pm to ihometiger
I see the rationale behind this law. False rape allegations often occur in these situations, where women say they consented to sex and then de-consented mid act. These cases are impossible to prove and effectively ruin the man's life, even if he's acquitted. The law also allows for men to be charged with assault if the sex becomes too rough or involves physical pain or violence.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:02 pm to BamaSaint
quote:
It won't be classified as rape, but possibly assault or kidnapping, whatever
Overnight parking?
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:04 pm to ihometiger
I don't have an issue with this...
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:06 pm to LCA131
Short term parking, for some of us.
To the OP, not cool at all when the sign said Loading Zone.
To the OP, not cool at all when the sign said Loading Zone.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:08 pm to ihometiger
"No" means "yes".
"Yes" means "anal".
And in NC, "no" means "anal", too.
"Yes" means "anal".
And in NC, "no" means "anal", too.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:09 pm to ihometiger
I'm calling bullshite on this. Gotta source that isn't click bait bullshite?
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:17 pm to G Vice
quote:
G Vice
Hey Guy. I was out of town in Boone with Mrs LCA. How did things go? did they have a good time?
on topic...I am not a lawyer but I used to watch Perry Mason.
Posted on 6/27/17 at 8:38 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
What if I pull out and am about to bust a nut and she revokes consent and I can't stop it and I bust a nut all over her after she revoked consent?
At the exact moment that she said no you were outside of the puss and did not reenter so no rape. But if busted on her could be battery with bodily fluid.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News