Started By
Message

re: Looks like the A-10 is here to stay

Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:03 am to
Posted by Argonaut
Member since Nov 2015
2059 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:03 am to
quote:

the battlefield you're talking about is no longer the battlefield we are on


Maybe not, but it certainly could be at any time.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134905 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:07 am to
With Eastern Europe becoming a potential hot zone again, aren't these types of aircraft becoming more valuable since they were designed for that AO?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89635 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:08 am to
quote:

The F35 is probably far superior from a capability standpoint.


In theory. Practice is a bitch, though. Plus the growing pains have been so significant for the F-35 that by the time they're all ironed out, it will be an obsolete platform.

quote:

F35 is definitely more athletic and far more advanced.


Doesn't do anything well at this point. Highly problematic (although I do think the worst problems are behind them, the cost to get to where we are today has been extraordinary - beyond the pale.)

quote:

The A10 is oldddddd


Tried and true. And it does 1 thing extraordinarily well (and nothing else).

quote:

Affordability and simplicity is part of supportability and the A10 kicks the F35's arse in that category.


Not even really a discussion. The F-35 must be considered, at best, an operational push. The A-10 has been a lifesaving gamechanger when it has been tasked for missions during it's operational history to date. Demonstrated performance of a platform like this must be recognized when comparing to the hugely expensive, "maybe so, if we ever get it to work right" boondoggle that is the F-35.
This post was edited on 10/28/16 at 11:09 am
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:23 am to
my fav fighter
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20543 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:26 am to
quote:

on the battlefield with inferior CAS due to asinine bureaucracy. This isn't fricking call of duty, the battlefield you're talking about is no longer the battlefield we are on, and keeping fifteen sets of scalpels when a knife can accomplish that job and more doesn't make sense.


That is absurd. It currently does 3 things not only well, but about tGoat.

1.) CAS
2.) US morale when they arrive is boosted
3.) Enemy Morale when they arrive is all but gone

There's really not another weapon that our troops on the ground enjoy seeing arrive more than an A-10 and nothing that stomps the enemies morale more than the A-10. The F-35 and every other option can provide CAS, but with current stealth operation it simply will not be the morale changer like the A-10.
Posted by cubsfan5150
Member since Nov 2007
15795 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:31 am to
Exactly, the A-10 does one thing well, very well, but it can't do that one thing without air supremacy. We can't gain air supremacy without the top fighters and bombers in the world, yet everyone wants to cut the F-35... we can't.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89635 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:32 am to
quote:

can't gain air supremacy without the top fighters


So, we stopped buying F-22s (supposed to have gotten 300, bought ~187 or so), to buy the F-35 which ISN'T and WILL NEVER BE an air superiority/supremacy platform.

quote:

yet everyone wants to cut the F-35


Because it has been a prohibitively expensive failure to this point.

quote:

we can't.


Sunk costs fallacy.
Posted by cubsfan5150
Member since Nov 2007
15795 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:53 am to
We're about to start buying a shite load more 22's


The F-35 will very much play a role in destruction of radar and missile sites... all part of air supremacy.

Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:56 am to
And It's not just the F35, that's just the must publicly visible example. I get the idea of consolidating missions into one piece of hardware but when it's as cost prohibitive as the F35 or the USS Zumwalt, it just don't work.

You've got to have hardware that you can mass produce in large quantities and keep operational on the front line. That aspect of war has never changed throughout the history of mankind.

Grammer edit
This post was edited on 10/28/16 at 11:59 am
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134905 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 11:58 am to
quote:

You've got to have hardware that you can mass produce in large quantities and keep operational on the front line. That aspect of was has never changed throughout the history of mankind.


Yeah, no different than Shermans/T-34s vs. Tiger tanks.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30302 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 12:06 pm to
As Josef Stalin said, "Quantity has a quality all its own."
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89635 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

We're about to start buying a shite load more 22's


I doubt the restart is much more than fantasy.

I've been hard on the F-35 because it's been run, from beginning to end, so poorly. At the end of the day, an F-22 costs just short of $70,000 per hour to operate. Reapers cost less than $5k per hour.

In 2011, just 1 bomb in 20 delivered by the USAF was via drone. In 2015, that rate topped 50% for the first time.

SO, the future is bright for drones. Manned aircraft? Not so much.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 12:12 pm to
Yea and I think we're kind of in denial that we may have to fight like that again one day. We've got the best shite and the most shite, but I don't know that we can replace what we have at any appreciable rate if it starts getting shot up and worn out. Do I think Russia can field a squadron of Su-37's to dominate the sky and hold it for the duration of a war? frick no. They probably can't field and support one for more than a week. They probably could however put a shitpile of 1970's migs up and if they can build them as fast as we can blow them up, we'd have a problem.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 12:16 pm to
Posted by LSUcjb318
Member since Jul 2008
2364 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 12:18 pm to
Thanks Obama
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17547 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

The F-35 and every other option can provide CAS, but with current stealth operation it simply will not be the morale changer like the A-10.


Also, the 35 most certainly doesn't have the legs, either, so it can't loiter. And if its going to try that stealth stuff, then its worthless as CAS because of not being able to hang ordinance...and if it does hang ordinance then the stealth is gone.

Also, someone pull up the video of the 35 doing gun test
Posted by cubsfan5150
Member since Nov 2007
15795 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

SO, the future is bright for drones. Manned aircraft? Not so much.


It all depends on who we're fighting... just like the future of the A-10.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89635 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

You've got to have hardware that you can mass produce in large quantities and keep operational on the front line.


They were worried about the drones' reliability at first. I was in Iraq when the Army had its first armed drone strike. I remember asking the operations people, "Any issues with flying them in the dust or other hairy issues?" They told me on some days, the Warrior Alphas (MQ-1B - a Predator variant) were the only things up.

Good times...
This post was edited on 10/28/16 at 12:31 pm
Posted by Argonaut
Member since Nov 2015
2059 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 2:17 pm to
Yes. Anyone that thinks they should go away doesn't understand their capabilities or war, maybe both.
Posted by Dave lsu 89
B.R,/ Houston
Member since Jun 2016
3879 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 2:57 pm to
I'll never forget that image of a whart hog returning from patrol during desert storm...MISSING A WING, bad arse plane, as a former army vet, the Apache does awesome providing security but no way do I ever want those tank killing A10s gone.....
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram