- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawyers of the OT quesiton
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:58 am to LSUTigerBait07
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:58 am to LSUTigerBait07
Your employee white?
Race of the alleged attackers?
Race of the alleged attackers?
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 10:59 am
0
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:00 am to LSUTigerBait07
I would strongly urge you to ignore any legal advice you read on this thread as some people have given answers that are completely, 180 degrees, wrong. If she wants a real answer, contact a local attorney.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:00 am to Downtown Devin Brown
GOLD JERRY
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:01 am to LSUTigerBait07
quote:you are part of what is wrong with America
Does she have any legal recourse with starbucks
person gets assaulted on private property, so sue the private property because they didnt handle the situation like you would have wanted it handled?
i really hope this is a troll thread
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:03 am to Rouge
quote:
you are part of what is wrong with America
person gets assaulted on private property, so sue the private property because they didnt handle the situation like you would have wanted it handled?
i really hope this is a troll thread
Starbucks is an evil corporation with billions of dollars. Corporations are what is wrong with america. Take all you can from them.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:09 am to Breesus
quote:
you are part of what is wrong with America person gets assaulted on private property, so sue the private property because they didnt handle the situation like you would have wanted it handled? i really hope this is a troll thread
I hope that's a troll.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:09 am to Cold Cous Cous
quote:
I would strongly urge you to ignore any legal advice you read on this thread as some people have given answers that are completely, 180 degrees, wrong. If she wants a real answer, contact a local attorney.
This. She will be able to get a free consult from any local personal injury attorney. Don't come to an anonymous internet forum for legal advice.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:10 am to Rouge
Until you know the whole story, that's a bit premature, don't you think? This should certainly be investigated, especially if the Starbucks employees let it happen. There might not be any liability, but to rule it out based on what we know is just silly.
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 11:11 am
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:13 am to LSUTigerBait07
quote:most certainly not
I hope that's a troll.
it is not Starbucks fault that your employee got assaulted
to try and profit for that misfortune in such a manner is deplorable
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:14 am to LSUTigerBait07
You should have been providing your employees protection from unprovoked attacks...you're just as liable as Starbucks is.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:44 am to LSUTigerBait07
quote:
have an employee that was assaulted in starbucks last night. She was brutally beaten, and suffered a broken arm, and orbital bone. The starbucks employees sat around and watched and laughed. Aside from the employees being worthless pieces of shite, Does she have any legal recourse with starbucks or only her assailants?
Ask yourself what Starbucks could have done differently?
Do they have a duty to keep their patrons safe from things they have control over? Sure.
A random unprovoked attack? Probably not
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:50 am to LSUTigerBait07
Are the employees supposed to intervene, and get their asses whipped too, or possibly killed? Not many badass barristas.
Not sure about CA law, but in La there is no duty to prevent criminal assaults of 3rd parties, unless the crime in the area is so bad that an attack was foreseeable.
Not sure about CA law, but in La there is no duty to prevent criminal assaults of 3rd parties, unless the crime in the area is so bad that an attack was foreseeable.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:51 am to LSUTigerBait07
quote:
Does she have any legal recourse with starbucks or only her assailants?
Both
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 11:53 am
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News