- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Knowledgable or Trainable
Posted on 12/11/15 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 12/11/15 at 4:28 pm
What is the better trait to have in the work world? Would it be better to be book smart or to be able to be told to do something once and exceed at the tasks given to you?
Posted on 12/11/15 at 4:29 pm to Large Farva
Depends on the field of work
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:25 pm to Large Farva
From what I've seen, book smart college education people use the "ideal" conditions they are taught in school and try to apply that to everything. They don't live in the real world where problems and differences happen every day.
Plus, I hate book smart people because they make better grades than me, but I know more than them
Plus, I hate book smart people because they make better grades than me, but I know more than them
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:29 pm to Large Farva
Salesmanship and likeability--in my line of business I struggle to grow my company because people lack these two qualities.
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:30 pm to Large Farva
I assume you are talking about far ends of each spectrum. In my experience neither is an effective employee. However I would rather someone that is toward the "fast learner" end of the spectrum vs a super smart person
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:59 pm to jose canseco
I am working for an oil company and currently working on my mech eng degree. I have met numerous people in both sides of the spectrum, regarding my question. My opinion is you want someone that is trainable. Knowledgable people would jump into a task thinking they know how to do perform the task by reading books. I believe they wouldn't ask questions. A trainable person would pick up on how the company wants them to complete tasks and would ask questions. Which would lead to that person becoming more knowledgable in that certain area.
Posted on 12/11/15 at 6:02 pm to JoseVargasTX
sounds like you are hiring the wrong people
Posted on 12/11/15 at 6:04 pm to Large Farva
quote:This may be true if we treat them as essentially mutually exclusive. In reality, however, these these two traits are positively correlated.
My opinion is you want someone that is trainable. Knowledgable people would jump into a task thinking they know how to do perform the task by reading books. I
Posted on 12/11/15 at 6:09 pm to Large Farva
My job requires a degree. After that, give me trainable, motivated, personable, and able to meet deadlines in a fast paced environment.
Posted on 12/11/15 at 6:09 pm to Large Farva
True, but IMO you need to have a certain level of book smarts to be trainable. I don't think someone can effectively learn without having a certain base knowledge.
Posted on 12/11/15 at 7:44 pm to jose canseco
You just have to have the ability to want to learn. I have worked with people on both ends of the spectrum, from techs who barely made it out of high school, to Indian (dot) 4.0 students finishing their Master's degree in the field I was working in.
The tech picked up on things quickly, got independent faster, but we never had him do calculations. The Indians just couldn't figure shite out no matter how many times you told them, so we stuck them inside and just gave them the numbers we wanted crunched.
The tech picked up on things quickly, got independent faster, but we never had him do calculations. The Indians just couldn't figure shite out no matter how many times you told them, so we stuck them inside and just gave them the numbers we wanted crunched.
Posted on 12/11/15 at 8:02 pm to Large Farva
I interviewed with a bank recently and expect to get an offer of some type soon. I had them write up an analysis of my interviews which gets to your question.
They said I didn't have enough experience to qualify for the job I was applying for. So it would seem like that was the primary factor.
But.... They said I gave across such an overwhelming sense that i would produce "quality work" that they wanted me to work there under a different capacity to gain experience.
The wait is absolutely driving me crazy lol.
They said I didn't have enough experience to qualify for the job I was applying for. So it would seem like that was the primary factor.
But.... They said I gave across such an overwhelming sense that i would produce "quality work" that they wanted me to work there under a different capacity to gain experience.
The wait is absolutely driving me crazy lol.
Posted on 12/11/15 at 8:40 pm to athenslife101
Best of luck to you. But, in your situation it seems that bank wants trainable over knowledgable. That is not a shot at you. But, they are considering you for your want to learn. Which I believe makes a stronger worker. That person has something to strive for. They have the want to be promoted and move up in a company.
Posted on 12/11/15 at 9:01 pm to Large Farva
Yeah, i know several people who work their now and they were all brought in on mid length contracts before being given full time and I was told that's what they want for me.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News