Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Knowledgable or Trainable

Posted on 12/11/15 at 4:28 pm
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8317 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 4:28 pm
What is the better trait to have in the work world? Would it be better to be book smart or to be able to be told to do something once and exceed at the tasks given to you?
Posted by Bama and Beer
Baldwin Co, AL
Member since Oct 2010
80896 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 4:29 pm to
Depends on the field of work
Posted by Skinner
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
352 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 4:33 pm to
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43030 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:25 pm to
From what I've seen, book smart college education people use the "ideal" conditions they are taught in school and try to apply that to everything. They don't live in the real world where problems and differences happen every day.

Plus, I hate book smart people because they make better grades than me, but I know more than them
Posted by JoseVargasTX
Heath, TX
Member since Sep 2011
719 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:29 pm to
Salesmanship and likeability--in my line of business I struggle to grow my company because people lack these two qualities.
Posted by jose canseco
Houston via Houma via BR via NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
5667 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:30 pm to
I assume you are talking about far ends of each spectrum. In my experience neither is an effective employee. However I would rather someone that is toward the "fast learner" end of the spectrum vs a super smart person
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8317 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 5:59 pm to
I am working for an oil company and currently working on my mech eng degree. I have met numerous people in both sides of the spectrum, regarding my question. My opinion is you want someone that is trainable. Knowledgable people would jump into a task thinking they know how to do perform the task by reading books. I believe they wouldn't ask questions. A trainable person would pick up on how the company wants them to complete tasks and would ask questions. Which would lead to that person becoming more knowledgable in that certain area.
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8317 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 6:02 pm to
sounds like you are hiring the wrong people
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

My opinion is you want someone that is trainable. Knowledgable people would jump into a task thinking they know how to do perform the task by reading books. I
This may be true if we treat them as essentially mutually exclusive. In reality, however, these these two traits are positively correlated.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63025 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 6:09 pm to
My job requires a degree. After that, give me trainable, motivated, personable, and able to meet deadlines in a fast paced environment.
Posted by jose canseco
Houston via Houma via BR via NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
5667 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 6:09 pm to
True, but IMO you need to have a certain level of book smarts to be trainable. I don't think someone can effectively learn without having a certain base knowledge.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43030 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 7:44 pm to
You just have to have the ability to want to learn. I have worked with people on both ends of the spectrum, from techs who barely made it out of high school, to Indian (dot) 4.0 students finishing their Master's degree in the field I was working in.

The tech picked up on things quickly, got independent faster, but we never had him do calculations. The Indians just couldn't figure shite out no matter how many times you told them, so we stuck them inside and just gave them the numbers we wanted crunched.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18568 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 8:02 pm to
I interviewed with a bank recently and expect to get an offer of some type soon. I had them write up an analysis of my interviews which gets to your question.

They said I didn't have enough experience to qualify for the job I was applying for. So it would seem like that was the primary factor.

But.... They said I gave across such an overwhelming sense that i would produce "quality work" that they wanted me to work there under a different capacity to gain experience.

The wait is absolutely driving me crazy lol.
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8317 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 8:40 pm to
Best of luck to you. But, in your situation it seems that bank wants trainable over knowledgable. That is not a shot at you. But, they are considering you for your want to learn. Which I believe makes a stronger worker. That person has something to strive for. They have the want to be promoted and move up in a company.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18568 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 9:01 pm to
Yeah, i know several people who work their now and they were all brought in on mid length contracts before being given full time and I was told that's what they want for me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram