Started By
Message

re: Jury finds all Oregon standoff defendants not guilty

Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:03 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260630 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

but this entire Oregon ordeal was originally about an arson case


Nah, it wasn't, much more to it than that. But the Bundies and their ilk were the worst people to "represent" it.

Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80267 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:04 pm to
Jury nullification
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

the BLM and....
those people are everywhere!
Posted by islandtiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2012
1787 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

US taking over whole states


Not exactly. After the US govt. Took over vast areas of the West from the original indigenous occupants (usually via bogus treaties) the land was offered to white settlers. The settlers took the best land and left the mountains, deserts, etc. in federal hands. BLM, USFS, etc. manage those lands under a multiple-use mandate. Those lands belong to all of us and ranchers, farmers, timber companies, etc. should pay us fair market value to use them for commercial purposes. The occupants were in the WRONG.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84896 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

I haven't followed this. Were they really not guilty?




frick no. They were as guilty as one can be, but as someone stated earlier, this was a case of jury nullification.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260630 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:08 pm to
quote:



Not exactly. After the US govt. Took over vast areas of the West from the original indigenous occupants (usually via bogus treaties) the land was offered to white settlers. The settlers took the best land and left the mountains, deserts, etc. in federal hands. BLM, USFS, etc. manage those lands under a multiple-use mandate. Those lands belong to all of us and ranchers, farmers, timber companies, etc. should pay us fair market value to use them for commercial purposes


Federal land managers are the worst neighbors a man could have.

BTW: They are talking native groups into signing over land into "trusts" for money. The tan man once again falls prey to the federal govt.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84896 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Nah, it wasn't, much more to it than that. But the Bundies and their ilk were the worst people to "represent" it.



Yes, you're right that the arson case was the result of issues with the BLM. The Hammonds were let off with a light sentence, but the appeals court nullified that sentence and re-sentenced them to 5 years in prison to begin in January 2016. The Bundys caught wind and blew the whole thing up for their own gain.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260630 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:15 pm to
quote:


Yes, you're right that the arson case was the result of issues with the BLM.


BLM had been buying private land up and the Hammond Ranch was one which refused to sell. The FedGov used less than honorable tactics to attempt to gain the property.

The problem here, is that the Hammonds were probably guilty of the charges, but the FedGov can't be held to the same standard.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
13901 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Federal land managers are the worst neighbors a man could have.
. Exactly, because those fed employees aren't managers, thyre environmentalists wacko's.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260630 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

. Exactly, because those fed employees aren't managers, thyre environmentalists wacko's.


Around here, this is very true.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20871 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:19 pm to
This is awesome. Good for them.
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:21 pm to
Is this what's called jury nullification? I'm not big on legalese but would this qualify?
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Jury nullification


I should have read before posting, thanks for clarifying this. Ya big sucking leach.
Posted by Fusaichi Pegasus
Meh He Co
Member since Oct 2010
14566 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:25 pm to
Nice use of the word ilk
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80267 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:28 pm to
Psh I probably know like so many more words than you
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 9:29 pm
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:30 pm to
GOOD!!
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:31 pm to
Whatever bruh, I know like hundreds of words, all the good ones two.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84896 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Whatever bruh, I know like hundreds of words, all the good ones two.





Your an idiot.
Posted by BayouFann
CenLa
Member since Jun 2012
6868 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:40 pm to
#privilege
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83937 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:43 pm to
#WhitePrivilege
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram