Started By
Message

re: Girl Does Cartwheels During Her DUI Stop, Still Gets Arrested, Kicks Cop

Posted on 2/22/17 at 2:12 pm to
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69097 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 2:12 pm to
a good lawyer will get her off. She wasn't observed driving while drunk. No law against being drunk in a parked car.

Posted by PaperPaintball92
Fly Navy
Member since Aug 2010
5297 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 2:17 pm to
Absolutely
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
1752 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 2:20 pm to
quote:


No law against being drunk in a parked car.



You'd be surprised.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69097 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 2:23 pm to
I know that's why i said a good lawyer will get her off.

I have heard of people who blew .05 getting convicted of DWI so it's all about beating the prosecution.

Posted by AZTarheeel
Member since Feb 2015
3702 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

It's written law. That's what.



You must have had a shitty lawyer. A buddy of mine got 3 aggravated DUIs in 6 months in NM and nobody took his vehicle. (He was required to have an interlock for 3 years)
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67590 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

No law against being drunk in a parked car.


if the keys are in the ignition you can get a dui
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20895 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

A buddy of mine got 3 aggravated DUIs in 6 months in NM


That's specific to Albequerque. NM actually passed a law forbidding the govt stealing property without a conviction, but Albequerque is claiming that the law doesn't apply to them.

NM passes law forbidding civil asset forfeiture. Albeqeuerque ignores it.

quote:

Albuquerque resident Arlene Harjo, 56, is paying off a loan for a car she doesn't have, because the city seized it for a crime it readily admits she didn't commit, under an asset forfeiture program that is supposed to be banned.

After her son was pulled over for drunk driving, Harjo became one of roughly a thousand people every year who have their car seized by the city of Albuquerque in a process heavily weighted against the property owner. But unlike the vast majority of those cases, she's not rolling over. A new lawsuit filed Wednesday in state court by Harjo and the Institute for Justice, a libertarian-leaning public interest law firm, argues the city's lucrative vehicle seizure program stands in direct contradiction of recently passed state laws and "is driven by a pernicious—and unconstitutional—profit incentive" that deprived Harjo of her 14th Amendment due process rights.


quote:

Albuquerque has a particularly aggressive program to seize vehicles from drivers suspected of driving under the influence. According to the Albuquerque Journal, the city has seized 8,369 vehicles and collected more than $8.3 million in forfeiture revenues since 2010, roughly 1,000 cars a year.

"The cases I've seen are usually where parents own a car, their kid goes out and does something stupid, and then the parents end up getting their car seized," Lisa Torraco, one of the state lawmakers who sued the city, and a practicing attorney, told me in an interview earlier this year.

Which is exactly what happened to Harjo.


In April, Harjo's son Tino asked to borrow her car to take a mid-day trip to the gym. When he didn't come back that night, Harjo got worried and started calling around. The next morning, she found out Tino had driven her car to Texas to hang out with his girlfriend. On the way back, he was pulled over and arrested for drunk driving.
Posted by DivotBreath
On the course
Member since Oct 2007
3506 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 4:00 pm to
It is pretty disappointing, particularly in this case, that the body cameras do not provide a wider angle view. Who wants to watch her shadow when there were other things to focus on?
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69097 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 5:20 pm to
I agree you can and will, my point is a charge =/=(!=) a conviction.

Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/22/17 at 6:47 pm to
I believe forfeiture of the car should be made a penalty for a second offense if you are stupid enough to do it again after your first one and you ought to go to an express lane so you can be convicted quickly.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram