Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Started By
Message

City of St. George effort apparently fails

Posted on 6/13/15 at 7:56 pm
Posted by potent357
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2010
4033 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 7:56 pm
Advocate

A petition drive to get a measure on the ballot to create a new City of St. George has fallen short of the number of names required, a group opposing the incorporation effort is reporting.

The Residents Against the Breakaway group posted on its Facebook site a letter from Registrar of Voters Steve Raborn stating that fewer than 25 percent of registered voters within the proposed city limits.

The letter was dated Saturday with a time of 5 p.m. and is posted on the group’s Facebook site, https://www.facebook.com/RATBBatonRouge .

The city of St. George petition effort failed by 71 votes, the East Baton Rouge Parish Registrar of Voters announced Saturday.

The shortfall means that after more than a year of working toward a vote to create the new city of St George, that the city proposal will not be voted on and the thousands of signatures collected on the petition will be voided. Volunteers with the effort are barred from starting anew for two years.
Related Documents

The pro-St. George group also posted on its website that it was informed Saturday afternoon that they were 71 signatures short of the 17,788 required.

“We are in the process of reviewing the verification and tabulation process as well as preparing a legal challenge,” the group said.

“We believe there were clear errors in the process, and that in fact the total number of signatures obtained on the petition well exceeds the statutory number required. To say this is over would be inaccurate. We will continue to fight to ensure the people’s voice is heard.”

This post was edited on 6/13/15 at 8:01 pm
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 7:57 pm to
Wow
Posted by FleurDeLonestar
The Dirty HOU
Member since Mar 2011
6162 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 7:57 pm to
Uh oh
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36692 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:00 pm to
Yikes
Posted by T
Member since Jan 2004
9889 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:03 pm to
They were well over the number a few weeks ago because of the new signatures that were added to the already verified number. How could hundreds of new signatures be voided? Doesn't make much sense.
Posted by Fenster
Member since Mar 2008
841 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:04 pm to
This means the school system in EBR is about to reach Ivy League status.
Posted by BLM
ATL
Member since Oct 2011
746 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:05 pm to
Wow and damn.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98185 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:08 pm to
Drink up, Shenandoah.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40135 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:08 pm to
Gonna be a long court battle coming.
Posted by PaulBurbank007
Member since Nov 2013
821 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:09 pm to
900 pages
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:09 pm to
Combination of new sigs weren't actually valid (not living in district, non registered voter) and people who signed the initial petition and wanted their name removed.
Posted by potent357
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2010
4033 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:13 pm to
From the St George Facebook page:

quote:

The Registrar of Voters informed us this afternoon that we were 71 signatures short of the 17,788 required. We are reviewing the verification and tabulation process as well as preparing a legal challenge. We believe there were clear errors throughout the process, and that the number of signatures obtained well exceeds the statutory number required. To say this is over would be inaccurate. We will continue to fight to ensure the people's voice is heard.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:13 pm to
Greedier Together gonna get that money to fund the incompetent school administration salaries and bonuses for the awful job they do!

They deserve it! It's cultcha!
Posted by Wes B
WESton-Broom
Member since Jun 2012
356 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:15 pm to
Does this mean we never have to hear about this again.

Yesssssss.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

We believe there were clear errors throughout the process, and that the number of signatures obtained well exceeds the statutory number required.


They were never going to be able to get it on the ballot under a fair process.
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127409 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Does this mean we never have to hear about this again.

For at least 2 years.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:19 pm to
Posted by TigahRag
Sorting Out OT BS Since 2005
Member since May 2005
132775 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:20 pm to
I'm surprised they came as close as they did with this thing as unorganized as it was .. They never really had their shite together ..
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127409 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

not living in district

I saw at least 1 SG yard sign in 2 areas:

Wedgewood
Tara

Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
77976 posts
Posted on 6/13/15 at 8:21 pm to
Smells like a bunch of corrupt bullshite to me
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram