- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Bad police work' in Alton Sterling's death, but don't expect a conviction ...
Posted on 9/19/16 at 12:27 pm to Poodlebrain
Posted on 9/19/16 at 12:27 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
I doubt it was the intent of the "experts" to pander, but I think it is a case of the Advocate asking their opinions, and using creative editing to advance its agenda.
THIS is the correct answer. Y'all should be arguing less about the facts and experts statements and instead be asking why the Advocate was motivated to create such a crap piece of (I was going to say Journalism but this is more) tabloid trash.
I was interviewed for 30 minutes a while back for a story and they ended up using two lines of what I said and made my statements appear opposite of my position. I was VERY clear throughout the interview where I stood on the subject and it came out the other way in the piece. I was livid and the Editor didn't seem to care one bit when I got in touch.
The Advocate has 100% lost any semblance of journalistic integrity and, just as bad IMO, there were multiple typos in the story online. It was obviously a feature piece and not some two paragraphs they threw together on the laptop for the website. How do you not proof read and correct typos. It's just plain sad what passes for news these days.
1
Posted on 9/19/16 at 12:30 pm to shel311
Why in the world would 5 experts, basically all of them feel the need to pander to anyone? That makes no sense.
Who says they're experts? Or are they just mouthpieces for hire?
Who says they're experts? Or are they just mouthpieces for hire?
Posted on 9/19/16 at 12:31 pm to TigerBait2008
quote:
Cause you're still a fricking idiot..
Posted on 9/19/16 at 12:48 pm to shel311
quote:
shel311
If you answered his question, just screenshot it. Or link it. Or quote it.
Do anything other than respond like a little brother sitting in the back of the minivan, saying "Yes, I did! Yes, I did!"
Good Lord, man.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 12:54 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
The BLM folks would only be satisfied if the cops never showed up at all.
They don't want the police to show up at all unless they are the ones who need them.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:00 pm to OweO
quote:
They don't want the police to show up at all unless they are the ones who need them.
Actually, when it comes to policing, they only want black cops who live in black neighborhoods to provide protection. And those black cops shouldn't arrest anyone because it makes statistics racist.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:00 pm to gallagherkck
quote:Ohhhh, so he's not the little brother screaming and kicking, "no you didn't?"
If you answered his question, just screenshot it. Or link it. Or quote it. Do anything other than respond like a little brother sitting in the back of the minivan, saying "Yes, I did! Yes, I did!" Good Lord, man.
It's not my fault he didn't read the thread, he's a big boy, he can do it. I don't have to do it for him.
It's strange that you expect me to go out of my way to do that, but you don't expect him to, I don't know, read the thread and stop blindly saying "No, you didn't" when yes I did. Wondering what's your thought process on that one?
Hell, I even said it was my "official" stance.
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:02 pm to gallagherkck
quote:
If you answered his question, just screenshot it. Or link it. Or quote it.
Do anything other than respond like a little brother sitting in the back of the minivan, saying "Yes, I did! Yes, I did!"
Good Lord, man.
Eh, he's just a troll that's desperately seeking attention.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:03 pm to upgrayedd
quote:Soooo desperate!!!!
Eh, he's just a troll that's desperately seeking attention.
Try not to be wrong so much next time, it'll be a better look for you.
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:05 pm to shel311
I see you're still melting
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:06 pm to upgrayedd
quote:I see you're still being wrong, par for the course in this thread.
I see you're still melting
Do you normally cry over and over and over stating a person did or didn't say something in a thread you didn't read? Just wondering if that's normal, seems like an odd thing to do.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:09 pm to shel311
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:13 pm to upgrayedd
What I'm trying to figure out right now, and it's close.
1. If you're really that naïve to keep telling me I didn't do something over and over without actually checking to see if I did it.
Or
2. You found the post that proved you wrong, but you're in too deep at this point so you've decided to just chug along.
I'm gonna go with 1, because if it were 2, I'd guess you woulda just stopped replying to me in hopes that me calling you out for being wrong would quietly go away.
1. If you're really that naïve to keep telling me I didn't do something over and over without actually checking to see if I did it.
Or
2. You found the post that proved you wrong, but you're in too deep at this point so you've decided to just chug along.
I'm gonna go with 1, because if it were 2, I'd guess you woulda just stopped replying to me in hopes that me calling you out for being wrong would quietly go away.
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:16 pm to shel311
You've wasted more time dancing with me than it would take to simply answer the question so I'm treating you like the worthless little troll you are.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:19 pm to upgrayedd
quote:1. I've already answered the question.
You've wasted more time dancing with me than it would take to simply answer the question so I'm treating you like the worthless little troll you are
2. You've wasted more time dancing with me than it would take to simply read my answer so I'm treating you like the worthless troll you are.
But hey, don't let being wrong get in the way, keep shouting it from the rooftops, maybe if you say it enough times, it'll magically come true!!!
I'm embarrassed for you right now, this is a really bad look. I mean, crying because I won't do your work for you, good times!!!
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:23 pm to shel311
Troll status: Confirmed
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:28 pm to OweO
quote:
If they would not have tased him and it ended up in him being shot, everyone would be wondering why they didn't try to taser him first
One of the comments on FB was that he was not resisting after being tased, it was muscle reactions from the taser.
Just like he didn't have a gun, oh, he did but it was for protection only.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:49 pm to upgrayedd
quote:We've entered the post random pic phase now that you are wayyyy too scared and past the point of trying to see how badly you were wrong here.
Troll status: Confirmed
Not sure I've ever seen someone be wrong with so much enthusiasm like 3 or 4 times in a thread, then ask someone else to the work for them when all you had to do was read, then call the other guy a troll for not holding your hand and walking you over to the post that shows you were wrong.
I'm basically a troll because you were too lazy to read...on a message board...where all you can do is read.
OT gonna OT!!!
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:52 pm to Will Cover
The teeth on the mural are very complimentary.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 1:54 pm to Will Cover
quote:
a CD peddler outside the shop who police were informed was armed
A convicted aggravated felon doing illegal things and illegally armed with a weapon is how that should read
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 1:54 pm
Page 6 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News