Started By
Message

re: 48 more bikers indicted in deadly shootout at Waco, Texas, Twin Peaks

Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:55 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64659 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

So I guess the 10 or so hoodlums that were involved had about 48 weapons each


Having a weapon in you does not constitute a crime. Anywhere I go, I've got my pistol, pocket knife, and wallet with chain. By the standards of what the Waco cops used that day. I usually have 3 weapons on me at anytime.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20912 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

So far over 150 of them. I'm sure there are a dozen or so they have already vetted and determined they were not involved.

My personal opinion is even if you were tangentially involved you catch charges.


Coming from the person that's OK with locking up innocent people, I don't see how arresting and indicting everyone would trouble you. As long as they get the murders, it's OK. Right?
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67591 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:56 pm to
I was thinking this was a DV thread but then I see its anti biker
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:56 pm to
So what's the real endgame here?

It's not to send 150+ guys up the river for the Twin Peaks thing so are prosecutors hoping to put the squeeze on to get information on other activities, people higher up in the food chain?
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20912 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

So what's the real endgame here?


Convictions. The more people arrested, the more you're "fighting crime".
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64659 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Coming from the person that's OK with locking up innocent people, I don't see how arresting and indicting everyone would trouble you. As long as they get the murders, it's OK. Right?



And to tell you how big of a joke these indictments are, in the first batch of 100 or so the procescutor mistakenly put them all down on 10 murder charges when only 9 people died (most shot by the cops btw). They had to go back and redo them. Says a a lot about a process when a prosecutor can get people indicted for a murder that never even happened.
Posted by StealthCalais11
Lurker since 2007
Member since Aug 2011
12452 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:00 pm to
Someone clearly forgot to take off their jacket before doing something illegal.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36695 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

You've seen the clear video proof that the vast majority of these people had nothing to do with the fight and did nothing other than take cover when it started. Yet you still keep up your bullshite trolling. Course I should not be surprised seeing how in the last Waco thread you stated you were perfectly fine with innocent people going to prison if it meant a guilty person didn't go free. Anyone who's even halfway followed the Waco story knows what's happening there is a prosecutor gone wild, shitting on the rule of law and the constitution in the process. Yes, there were bikers there that day who should be prosecuted, but nowhere near 170 of them.


basically 90% of bikers are only tough for show. They come to fight strapped up but run scared when the fight is brought to them.

Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64659 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:


So what's the real endgame here?

It's not to send 150+ guys up the river for the Twin Peaks thing so are prosecutors hoping to put the squeeze on to get information on other activities, people higher up in the food chain


One simple word... RICO. Namely RICO against the Bandido motorcycle club. This whole process started long before Tein Peaks ever happened. The Feds and Texas started a operation to take down the Bandidos named "Operation Texas Rocker". This was about the same time the cops infiltrated a long standing small Texas club called the Cossacks. After the cops infiltrated this club it all of a sudden started doing things like trying to claim territory by wearing a Texas bottom rocker and instigating confrontations with the Bandidos. The final phase of this operation was Twin Peaks. That's the day the cops sent the the club they'd infiltrated to start a fight with the Bandidos. The cops even set up cameras to catch it hours before. The goal was to catch the fight on tape and use that as evidence against the Bandidos. Only problem was things got out of hand. The Cossacks started the fight but then started shooting people. That's when the cops, already in position, opened fire and the situation got out of control.

What's going to happen next is all these cases will be handed over to the Feds for RICO charges on everyone, the Bandidos, the Cossacks, and all the rest. The Cossacks have served their purpose so now they're being thrown to the wolves.
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Even at 170 people that's still nearly 3 weapons per person.


If I'm going down, I don't want it to be for lack of shooting back either.
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Having a weapon in you does not constitute a crime. Anywhere I go, I've got my pistol, pocket knife, and wallet with chain. By the standards of what the Waco cops used that day. I usually have 3 weapons on me at anytime.


If you have those instruments on you during the commission of a crime it is an add on charge.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

If you have those instruments on you during the commission of a crime it is an add on charge.
What additional charge?
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

So what's the real endgame here?

It's not to send 150+ guys up the river for the Twin Peaks thing so are prosecutors hoping to put the squeeze on to get information on other activities, people higher up in the food chain?



The endgame is the elimination of the criminal element whether it be MCs, MS13, ISIS, etc. They are all fundamentally the same. Eradication is the o my appropriate measure. Since law enforcement cannot get them a at once I would say 150+ a pop is excellent. They are using their CIs effectively.
Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

So I guess the 10 or so hoodlums that were involved had about 48 weapons each.



lol.



all i can think of is some of them were strapped like 'that guy'.

plus most bikers, not sabi, are fat and have big jackets to store more weapons


Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:14 pm to
quote:


basically 90% of bikers are only tough for show. They come to fight strapped up but run scared when the fight is brought to them.



Exactly but they want to live that lifestyle they can suffer the Consequences and serve the jail time.
Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Anywhere I go, I've got my pistol, pocket knife, and wallet with chain.


is this considered a weapon?
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36695 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

is this considered a weapon?


when you got that DV long money
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

What's going to happen next is all these cases will be handed over to the Feds for RICO charges on everyone, the Bandidos, the Cossacks, and all the rest.


All of which are completely warranted and justified with mounds of evidence.

quote:

The goal was to catch the fight on tape and use that as evidence against the Bandidos. Only problem was things got out of hand. The Cossacks started the fight but then started shooting people. That's when the cops, already in position, opened fire and the situation got out of control.


The police diffused an extremely volatile situation with proportional force and discretion. The fact zero officers lost their lives that day is a testament to their training and development of CIs.
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

What additional charge?



Depends on your location but how about possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony. Or aggravated assault with a firearm (I believe in LA it's a misdemeanor unless they can prove discharge which upgrades it to a felony.).
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 4/14/16 at 2:22 pm to
Link those statutes. I want to be sure not to run afoul of the law.

ETA: Never realized I could get hit with an add-on charge for carrying a pocket knife while committing a crime. Going to need confirmation of that from our resident legal scholar.
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 2:27 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram