- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do you dislike Ingram?
Posted on 11/1/14 at 9:44 am to jheine2
Posted on 11/1/14 at 9:44 am to jheine2
quote:
Because he went to Bama and still reps them while playing in our state. This website is mainly diehard LSU fans and we don't like Bama.
So he should disown his alma mater? Also you should read the OP, you broke the rules of the thread
This post was edited on 11/1/14 at 9:45 am
Posted on 11/1/14 at 9:45 am to BarbeTiger
We gave up too much to get him for the impact he's had.
Posted on 11/1/14 at 10:00 am to JohnZeroQ
quote:
only shows up against shite D's
people don't realize how stupid they are for this statement. So he should go for 100+ on a top run D that holds all its opponents to less than 65 yards? Well that's rational.
Posted on 11/1/14 at 10:25 am to jheine2
quote:
Because he went to Bama and still reps them while playing in our state. This website is mainly diehard LSU fans and we don't like Bama.
That's like saying, when you move to another state you should stop repping the Saints because you're in a different city...?
There's being a gump and there's being an actual sports fan.
Most of you guys on here since Sunday night are gumps
Posted on 11/1/14 at 10:39 am to Let Me Take A Selfie
quote:
And Khiry didn't fumble in Seattle
Actually, yes he did.
Posted on 11/1/14 at 10:41 am to illuminatic
Ingram will be the Saints number 1 running back for the next 6-8 years if he stays healthy
Posted on 11/1/14 at 11:08 am to lsub16
quote:
Ingram will be the Saints number 1 running back for the next 6-8 years if he stays healthy
If he's the RB for the next 6-8 years, I think I'm gonna avoid ST.
Posted on 11/9/14 at 9:06 pm to BarbeTiger
Bump
27 attempts, 120 yards against a good 49ers run defense
27 attempts, 120 yards against a good 49ers run defense
This post was edited on 11/9/14 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 11/9/14 at 11:47 pm to BarbeTiger
All you haters blow dick
Posted on 11/9/14 at 11:55 pm to TOKEN
quote:
ATT YDS TD
@Atl 13 60 2
@Cle 11 83 1
Min 0 0 0
@Dal 0 0 0
TB 0 0 0
BYE - - - -
@Det 10 16 0
GB 24 172 1
@Car 30. 100 2
SF 27 120 0
115 Attempts
551 Yards
4.7 YPC
5 TDS
^^^^^^
fricking Horrible!
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:01 am to BarbeTiger
don't get me wrong.
but who is to say the coaches won't switch things back to the way they were before PT and Robinson got hurt?
but who is to say the coaches won't switch things back to the way they were before PT and Robinson got hurt?
This post was edited on 11/10/14 at 12:05 am
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:12 am to LooseCannon22282
feeding Ingram 5 more times wouldn't have won the ball game.
dumb turnovers coupled with a bad start defensively did us in.
I thought we had them but when they completed that 4th and 10 pass the writing was on the wall.
Ingram has been exactly what the Saints have needed in this stretch and it still might not matter.
the secondary is weak besides Lewis IMO. Linebacker could use a look too, We had some missed tackles from the LB's today that sure as shite didn't help.
dumb turnovers coupled with a bad start defensively did us in.
I thought we had them but when they completed that 4th and 10 pass the writing was on the wall.
Ingram has been exactly what the Saints have needed in this stretch and it still might not matter.
the secondary is weak besides Lewis IMO. Linebacker could use a look too, We had some missed tackles from the LB's today that sure as shite didn't help.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 1:04 am to SportsGuyNOLA
quote:
Lazy, underachiever, easily injured, performing best in his contract year
Also a Gump.
He's a beast now.
I would like the Saints keep him.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 2:30 am to BarbeTiger
quote:
27 attempts, 120 yards against a good 49ers run defense
That seems pretty average at best (certainly from a ypc standpoint) for what San Francisco has been giving up on the road to teams' top rushers.
Murray 22 for 118 (5.4), 1 TD
Ellington 18 for 62 (3.4)
Mason 5 for 40 (8.0)
Hillman 14 for 74 (5.3), 2 TD's
Ingram 27 for 120 (4.4)
Look, Ingram has had a wonderful 3 weeks and the Saints are certainly better with his running as he has while not having Pierre or Khiry available at all. He deserves the credit and praise he has been receiving. I honestly don't think though that the Saints would have lost to Green Bay or Carolina had they mixed in Pierre and/or Khiry had they been available. Would they have won had they had Pierre and/or Khiry available yesterday? That seems to be more speculative since the game was so close but I would guess probably not.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 5:36 am to The Pain Train
quote:
That seems pretty average at best
quote:
for what San Francisco has been giving up on the road to teams' top rushers.
I guess you have to selectively pick stats to support your argument. Just ignore that they held the Eagles to 22 rushing yards
SF is 7th against the run and gives up under 4 yards per attempt
quote:
Murray 22 for 118 (5.4), 1 TD
MVP candidate and best oline in NFL
quote:
Ellington 18 for 62 (3.4)
Great running back, must suck for only getting 3.4 ypc
quote:
Mason 5 for 40 (8.0)
5 carries, really? Stacy had 3.1 ypc on 8 carries. Cunnigham had 3.0 on 7 carries
I don't see what is so hard about understanding sample size.
Anyone who watched that game yesterday would have to be blind not to have been impressed. He routinely made something out of nothing. We lost the game for not giving him the ball on 3rd and 1
This post was edited on 11/10/14 at 5:40 am
Posted on 11/10/14 at 8:06 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
We lost the game for not giving him the ball on 3rd and 1
It was infuriating when Cadet checked in on short yardage situations. My section was probably sick of hearing me complain about it though
Posted on 11/10/14 at 8:18 am to The Pain Train
quote:
That seems pretty average at best for what San Francisco has been giving up on the road to teams' top rushers.
Did you not read the stats you posted? He leads all the back in yards.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 8:22 am to Breesus
120 yards on SF will not persuade anyone, especially on the heels of losing to bama because the refs fricked them(you)
Posted on 11/10/14 at 9:07 am to The Pain Train
quote:
That seems pretty average at best (certainly from a ypc standpoint) for what San Francisco has been giving up on the road to teams' top rushers.
Murray 22 for 118 (5.4), 1 TD
Ellington 18 for 62 (3.4)
Mason 5 for 40 (8.0)
Hillman 14 for 74 (5.3), 2 TD's
Ingram 27 for 120 (4.4)
Serious question.....are you mentally challenged?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News