Started By
Message

re: The Penalty Controversy at the beginning of the Second Half.

Posted on 12/9/13 at 3:49 pm to
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17474 posts
Posted on 12/9/13 at 3:49 pm to
Thanks, cat.
Been busy today.
Posted by mentalis
la
Member since Dec 2009
230 posts
Posted on 12/11/13 at 3:24 pm to
Take the first. The first time I've ever seen a team decline a first down and 10 to take a second down and three. No imaginings posted on this thread throws any light on an unexplainable decision.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/11/13 at 3:32 pm to
It is the right call.

2nd and 3 >> 1st and 10.

A coach would take a 7 yard gain on 1st every time if given to them
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/11/13 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

No imaginings posted on this thread throws any light on an unexplainable decision.


it is easily explainable, you just don't want to hear with it.

You may disagree with the explanation, but statistically it is the correct call.

You have a greater % of converting from 2nd and 3 than 1st and 10. A 4th and 3 in the NFL has around a 50% conversion rate. I'd imagine 2nd and 3 to be between 80-90%
This post was edited on 12/11/13 at 3:38 pm
Posted by TailgateTiger
Bullard, Texas
Member since Oct 2008
2183 posts
Posted on 12/11/13 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Did Sean Payton make the wrong Decision?


Hell no
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
16433 posts
Posted on 12/11/13 at 7:46 pm to
Of course he did.."if he had to do that 9 more times he would take the penalty every time. Clearly Brain fart
Posted by JacksonLSU
california
Member since Oct 2007
1664 posts
Posted on 12/12/13 at 5:07 am to
JESUS CHRIST yes it was a bad call---move on--we dont know why he did it but he did. stop analyzing and overthinking. it was and always will be a bad call to not accept that penalty at that time. move on
Posted by JacksonLSU
california
Member since Oct 2007
1664 posts
Posted on 12/12/13 at 5:09 am to
.........
This post was edited on 12/12/13 at 5:13 am
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/12/13 at 6:52 am to
quote:

.........



another brilliant post from the village idiot

Much higher odds of getting a 1st down from 2nd and 3 than on 1st and 10. You increase your chances of scoring on that drive by declining the penalty.

It really isn't up for debate either
This post was edited on 12/12/13 at 7:03 am
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/12/13 at 7:43 pm to
Here's an interesting breakdown

LINK

quote:

1st and 10, own 21: +0.38 EP

2nd and 3, own 23: +0.58 EP


quote:

It's a very slight difference, but if we're going to trust the numbers it appears that Payton probably made the right decision. These results hold up throughout the length of field, so it's not a quirk of being near a team's own 20. But it's close enough to be near the point of indifference (which would generally be a 2nd and 4 on a 6-yd gain). The results go against my intuition, and I'm not sure why 2nd and 3 plus 2 yards beats a 1st and 10--it just does. The takeaway here is just that Payton didn't make a mistake.



quote:

I know some readers who aren't familiar with EP might think it's some convoluted black box statistic, but it's simply the average net point expectancy given down/distance/yd-line situations.


This post was edited on 12/12/13 at 7:44 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram