- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/13/16 at 9:36 pm to Sho Nuff
We need a DE and DT in 1st 3 rounds, then we need a WR, CB, LB, and 2 Guards.
Posted on 2/13/16 at 11:34 pm to djmicrobe
If he gets healthy and fully recovered, Fuller is a top 10 pick who could fall to the second.
I doubt he makes it that far. He's really REALLY good.
I doubt he makes it that far. He's really REALLY good.
Posted on 2/14/16 at 12:52 am to Sho Nuff
On A'Shawn Robinson: "the only knock on Robinson is that he is limited as an interior pass rusher"
I thought that was his strength?
I thought that was his strength?
Posted on 2/14/16 at 1:22 am to THRILLHO
quote:
I'm higher on Buckner than A'Shawn
As is everyone I think so I don't see us getting Buckner. I do see A'Shawn being right there for us but I'm not #12 pick high on him.
quote:
(Doctson in the 2nd would be great if he drops that far due to injury)
He'll be gone by our 2nd pick guaranteed.
Posted on 2/14/16 at 1:24 am to hugo_boss
quote:
I agree that we need a WR but when your defense is putting up historically bad stats in consecutive seasons, how do you justify fixing that problem not being priority #1?
I said we should go D in 1, but I wouldn't be upset with a WR like Doctson in the 2nd. I would be happy to see 2 stud DL as well.
Posted on 2/14/16 at 1:26 am to sec627fan
quote:
How about this Draft
Uh, yeah. I can get behind the picks but not moving up in the 1st. Your first 5 are
Posted on 2/15/16 at 2:06 am to Sho Nuff
I'd rather us draft nothing but defense but the one position I don't want us wasting a 1-3rd round pick on is CB. We never hit on any of them.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 2:36 am to WicKed WayZ
quote:
I don't want us wasting a 1-3rd round pick on is CB. We never hit on any of them.
we picked two cornerbacks out of nine picks last year and that was after we'd signed Browner and it looked like Lewis/Browner would be the starters.
Browner looks to be out and Breaux now teams with Lewis who has been through a few surgeries lately.
Swann looked like he might be something when he played but he's already a few concussions.
trust me.. I get it.. we usually don't have all that great of luck picking corners in the draft but we might have to. There is no way to predict how the draft will shake out or how free agency will set the tone before hand.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 9:18 am to LosLobos111
quote:quote:
We have scrubs
Outside of cooks and sneah yeah
Snead is a poor man's Lance Moore and Cooks is afraid of contact at times.
Here's the question, 16 seconds left in the game, we're down by 6 points and we are on our own 13 yard line. Are you confident in any of our receivers to go get the ball for a touchdown? I'm almost more confident in Treadwell right now than anyone we have on the team currently.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 9:42 am to Suntiger
I have the utmost confidence in Drew and that's really all that matters
Posted on 2/15/16 at 9:52 am to Suntiger
I wish I could thumps you up and down
First off Snead is definitely better, or for better words has a more complete skill set than Lance Moore and he is physical. He will have a better career with us if he can stay healthy.
Yet I do not believe in any receiver on our roster to step up when we desperately need it . Treadwell is that guy, Snead can be taken out and of course Cooks will be the non factor that he is when we play these physical defenses.
If Jack isn't there and Treadwell falls you pull the trigger.
He and Cooks in a bunch with Cooks avoiding the jam behind him would be nice.
First off Snead is definitely better, or for better words has a more complete skill set than Lance Moore and he is physical. He will have a better career with us if he can stay healthy.
Yet I do not believe in any receiver on our roster to step up when we desperately need it . Treadwell is that guy, Snead can be taken out and of course Cooks will be the non factor that he is when we play these physical defenses.
If Jack isn't there and Treadwell falls you pull the trigger.
He and Cooks in a bunch with Cooks avoiding the jam behind him would be nice.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 9:55 am to Brandincookem
quote:
I wish I could thumps you up and down
Your trying to hard
Posted on 2/15/16 at 10:34 am to Sho Nuff
Until they address the front 7, they need to stay away from drafting a corner. We generate absolutely zero pass rush so we could have a backfield of Sherman and Peterson and still they'd get picked apart because the QB stands clean in the pocket for 5-7 seconds.
Football is won and lost at the line, and I am hoping our first three picks are spent on a DT, DE, and G.
Football is won and lost at the line, and I am hoping our first three picks are spent on a DT, DE, and G.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 12:56 pm to LSUZombie
Is it just me or am I sensing the most agreement ever on team needs this year?
DL, LB, & G BPAs bigtime
DL, LB, & G BPAs bigtime
Posted on 2/15/16 at 12:59 pm to blueslover
quote:
Is it just me or am I sensing the most agreement ever on team needs this year?
DL, LB, & G BPAs bigtime
well, TE and WR shouldn't be left out of discussion mid rounds per say.... I'm not against a CB if its BPA anywhere in the draft. DL is like 2 positions of need and another OLB isn't a horrible ideer.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 1:03 pm to Chad504boy
yeah, talking priority and what we would like to see in Rds 1-3. I started a draft a TE thread but with no thought of that pick being earlier than 3rd Rd.
When ya have not just a bad D, but a historically bad D, you cannot infuse enough better talent IMO
When ya have not just a bad D, but a historically bad D, you cannot infuse enough better talent IMO
Posted on 2/15/16 at 1:06 pm to blueslover
I can agree those are maybe the consensus priority at the moment but usually that changes a bit with FA. As of now, we do need Guards and Edge rushing bad.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 1:12 pm to Chad504boy
or changes a lot with FA 
Posted on 2/15/16 at 1:31 pm to blueslover
I can't see being able to afford DT and DE's that can pressure the QB. Those are so damn high on the market.
But a quality vet guard and TE would seem to be a bigger possibility in FA's.
But a quality vet guard and TE would seem to be a bigger possibility in FA's.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News