Started By
Message

re: Official: Payton + 3rd traded to broncos for first round in 2023 and 2nd next year.

Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:31 pm to
Posted by SauceBawse
Member since Mar 2022
182 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:31 pm to
Now draft a punter!
Posted by Deplorable Duke
Lousyana
Member since Nov 2016
2154 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:31 pm to
In all sincerity, frick YOU, Mickey Loomis!
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11954 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

How in the frick we give up a 3rd Loomis?????!

He almost always gives back a pick. The guy is pathetic at negotiating trades. So, almost a 2nd rounder this year and if Payton turns Denver around, we could be giving up a high 3rd for a low 2nd. The Broncos took him ot the woodshed.
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
66104 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Payton was never worth two 1’s.


So he was worth a 1st and a 2nd.

Not exactly far off. I just really regret they added towards Payton to get the deal done.
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
17300 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

we got as much as we could obviously. people act like loomis could have gotten more but he said nah we're good


I'm fine with what we got, I just don't understand why we needed to send over a 3rd. The first rounder is 29th and a 2nd next year. There was no reason to send over a 3rd. Maybe a 5th or something sure if they had to have something.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64437 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:34 pm to





Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57740 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

at anyone who thought the saints would get more than 1 1st


No one should have expected that realistically, but this is effectively as low of a first rounder as you can get and you have to give a pick back.

If the 2024 first rounder package was offered, you take that 10/10 times. The Saints won’t be competitive in 2023 regardless and the chances of getting a lower pick than 29 are practically zero.
This post was edited on 1/31/23 at 3:35 pm
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64437 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:34 pm to





Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14941 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

I mentioned several times that the Saints weren't getting two 1st round picks for a coach and several said I was wrong. This, however is a good deal in my opinion.

never mind! Saw were Saints gave the 3rd round pick...dumb


I don't like giving up the third, but anyone who thought we were getting two firsts is a moron.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71742 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

I just don't understand why we needed to send over a 3rd. The first rounder is 29th and a 2nd next year. There was no reason to send over a 3rd.

Obviously they weren't giving a 2nd straight up.
Posted by Buzz Lightbeer
Member since Feb 2018
1161 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:36 pm to
Can we at least throw in Pete Carmichael too?
Posted by ccarrone0313
Member since Jul 2021
1431 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

We could have gotten more. SP wanted to go to Denver and Loomis caved like a bitch. He could have easily called SP's bluff and waited a year. No, he took a shite deal, and now will have all the local guy's force-feeding us how it is "actually a good deal" and all the simplteons will eat that shite up.


oh yeah? lol message board GMs are my favorite. You realize if Denver is the only team that wants him this year and you wanna get it done you've lost all leverage? It's a good deal. Relax a little nancy. The Saints didn't want this to go another year, and that's the right move.
This post was edited on 1/31/23 at 3:38 pm
Posted by ccarrone0313
Member since Jul 2021
1431 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:37 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/31/23 at 3:37 pm
Posted by tibebecolston
Member since Mar 2013
4141 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:37 pm to
Basically the best coach ever to have been traded at the time of the trade based on resume and we end up giving them a pick? God damn Loomis sucks so bad.
Posted by SippyCup
Gulf Coast
Member since Sep 2008
6145 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:37 pm to
frick Loomis, Payton and the Saints!
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123671 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:37 pm to
LMFAO what a trash arse trade. Why the frick would we give them any sort of pick
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64437 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

I don't like giving up the third, but anyone who thought we were getting two firsts is a moron.


It was always...1st year 2 1st maybe...2nd year a 1st and maybe more picks...3rd year get whatever you can maybe a PN&J sammi.

Some were always trolling and some just plain stupid.
Posted by HTX Bayou Bengal
Houston, Texas
Member since Jun 2017
1610 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:38 pm to
Schefty: “Saints accepted the first deal that involved a 1st round pick”
Jesus Christ. Looks as if Loomis didn’t even try to play hardball for a decent 1R draft pick
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64437 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Why the frick would we give them any sort of pick


Then walk away and go into next year. Stupid?
Posted by Lsudx256
DFW
Member since Mar 2016
2911 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:38 pm to
Pathetic. Basically only picked up a very late first round pick and swapped 2 & 3 next year, which might only move us up a handful of spots.
Loomis needs to be termed immediately. If he ends up going to the Broncos they need to sue him for negligence.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram