Started By
Message

Is Cooks too small to be a #1 WR?

Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:24 pm
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112682 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:24 pm
I've yet to see one game where we can really say that him being our number one guy is the case. I think he can be a fine number two option, and give us 60-80 yards on underneath routes but he's no replacement for Graham or Stills as a true number one.
This post was edited on 9/27/15 at 5:27 pm
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36424 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:26 pm to
Yes.
Posted by CapperVin
Member since Apr 2013
10546 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:32 pm to
no doubt
Posted by KindaRaw
Member since Jun 2014
3963 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:33 pm to
No. Size isn't indicative of skill. Look at Steve Smith and Antonio Brown. Both are the #1 WRs on their respective teams.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71689 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:33 pm to
I still don't know why we're using him the way we are. When we drafted him everybody said to take the top off the defense and the only deep play I remember him making was in preseason.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112682 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:34 pm to
Both of those guys play aggressive. Cooks obviously does not have that factor...
Posted by KindaRaw
Member since Jun 2014
3963 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

Both of those guys play aggressive. Cooks obviously does not have that factor..

You literally proved my point. Cooks doesn't like contact, which sets him behind those two. He needs to be more physical or else he's going to go nowhere as a receiver.
Posted by GMoney2600
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
14110 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:37 pm to
Give him some time. It's only his 2nd year. He keeps getting better from everything I've seen. If he ever levels off any time soon...then I guess he's a solid #2 WR. He can still be a #1 guy imo.
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
25809 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:38 pm to
Saints need to get another receiver next year high in the draft.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71689 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

Give him some time. It's only his 2nd year.

Like 8-10 WRs in his draft class say no.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36424 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:39 pm to
quote:


You literally proved my point. Cooks doesn't like contact, which sets him behind those two. He needs to be more physical or else he's going to go nowhere as a receiver.



Yea this is true. Smith relishes contact. He's an animal. It's a combination of Cooks being small, adverse to contact, and how we're using him.
Posted by Zoltan
NOLA
Member since May 2010
1395 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:41 pm to
While I don't think size matters depending on how the individual plays, I will say that he hasn't impressed from a physicality standpoint vs press coverage.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112682 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:41 pm to
He literally hasn't had one game where he's been a #1
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112682 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 5:44 pm to
I agree. He seems content going out of bounds. Smith loves hitting folk.
Posted by fightingtigers98
Member since Oct 2011
13239 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 6:20 pm to
He is afraid of contact plain and simple
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71689 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 6:27 pm to
Smith had 50 yard TD today where he broke 3 tackles. Cooks would've definitely gone out of bounds after the catch. Then Smith completely demeaned the entire Bengals secondary by calling them either trash or frickboy. Cooks ain't cut from his cloth, damn near no one is.
This post was edited on 9/27/15 at 6:28 pm
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43575 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 6:31 pm to
no, he just isnt good enough. we drafted a guy with a #1 that is equal production wise to a lance moore or willie snead.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 6:40 pm to
He's currently on pace for 1,000 yards, fwiw


I think his biggest issue is that all the other receivers suck.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112682 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 6:55 pm to
Which is an issue when you're 5'7
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64249 posts
Posted on 9/27/15 at 6:57 pm to
not if we have other guys that need to be accounted for, I've wanted a 6'3" guy with speed and athleticism for years though
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram