I'm not going to copy and paste a post I made dissecting his "skepticism" as it regards the NFL and its treatment of the Saints organization and the bounty scandal. Suffice it to say he was insulting other people for being sheep and taking whatever the NFL was feeding them while accepting without question or pause for consideration extremely far-fetched and unreliable blog posts that called into question the evidence against the Saints. He found it inappropriate to rely on the information that the NFL front office put out, but based a number of his posts off of some wildly unreliable blog post crediting a single anonymous source within the Saints organization who claimed to have seen secret e-mails to four separate members of the coaching staff.
I have no position on the Saints bounty investigation. I do have a position on people who accuse others of being sheep for coming to a different conclusion than they have. It's obnoxious. What makes it worse is when the logic that you claim to rely on is full of holes of the exact kind that you accuse the other person's logic of.
This post was edited on 6/4 at 2:49 pm