- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
First two draft picks
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:23 am
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:23 am
Does anyone else feel that with all these defensive free agents that we're picking up, that the front office is thinking of offense with two of the first three picks?
I agree that we need D-line help but I wouldn't be that mad if we went 1st: Treadwell, 2nd: D-line, 3rd: Guard.
I agree that we need D-line help but I wouldn't be that mad if we went 1st: Treadwell, 2nd: D-line, 3rd: Guard.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:25 am to Keeble9145
its like we can go DT then LB or LB then DT, we could get wild and go DT then OG but you never know cause they may press for DE then go DT get stupid if you go WR and OLB but sometimes you gotta think if its all about a CB then a DT thats how you win championships unless you stop and get that ILB then DT.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:26 am to Keeble9145
The first two picks need to be guys who can start. I don't think it really matters what position. Get starting value there.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:30 am to Keeble9145
I think they go with a kicker.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:30 am to easy money
quote:
The first two picks need to be guys who can start. I don't think it really matters what position. Get starting value there.
This. Can't get someone who isn't going to see the field in your first 3 picks. Ex. SJB and Grayson
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:34 am to Keeble9145
1st-Dline
2nd-WR or OLB
3rd-guard
4th-whatever we didnt get in round 2 (WR or OLB)
2nd-WR or OLB
3rd-guard
4th-whatever we didnt get in round 2 (WR or OLB)
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:41 am to Keeble9145
No I still think they are going D Line. They left it to the draft because the free agent market for real talent on the D Line was too frothy.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:42 am to easy money
quote:
The first two picks need to be guys who can start.
some of our best picks over the past 12 years ish were guys who didn't start much year 1.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:44 am to Ryan3232
quote:
1st-Dline 2nd-WR or OLB 3rd-guard 4th-whatever we didnt get in round 2 (WR or OLB)
Wouldn't it make more sense to get the WR in rd 1 since you could probably get a 1st rd d-line talent in the second rd this year?
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:52 am to Keeble9145
quote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to get the WR in rd 1
no, there's no making sense of that ever.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:59 am to Chad504boy
Loomis typically gets players to fill the needed spots in free agency. Sometimes starters, sometimes just a body. I think this is to accommodate the best player available. I do not think it precludes drafting players at certain positions but opens it up more.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 10:07 am to Keeble9145
1st: Laquon Treadwell
2nd: Kenny Clark
3rd: Rashard Robinson
2nd: Kenny Clark
3rd: Rashard Robinson
Posted on 3/18/16 at 10:46 am to Keeble9145
It worries me that we haven't signed a veteran Guard in FA. I don't feel comfortable going in to the season with a rookie G, Kelemente, Lelito and possibly Strief.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 10:58 am to oreeg
having only those doesn't make me feel good but they have inserted a few guys into the O Line that were decent or better that I felt similarly about. Bushrod was prolly the most glaring example. We saw only a handful of snaps prior to him taking over.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 11:01 am to oreeg
quote:
Lelito
also still a RFA...
Posted on 3/18/16 at 11:01 am to Keeble9145
I'll keep saying it. We need help at DE, DT, OLB, WR and OG. I think we could draft any of those positions. (Although I don't think we go OL 1st unless Tunsil falls to us or something. And Treadwell is the only WR I'd take at 12 too.)
Posted on 3/18/16 at 11:24 am to Suntiger
Brees doesn't signed extension. Saints should draft a QB at 12. A tag for him might be close to 28 mil next yr.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 11:26 am to Load Toad
quote:
A tag for him might be close to 28 mil next yr.
try 44 million.
but you seem really bright.
Posted on 3/18/16 at 11:33 am to Chad504boy
You must be the biggest Troll/douche on this board lol. Good lord man, have a cup of coffee and enjoy your day. Its friday
Posted on 3/18/16 at 11:38 am to Keeble9145
If we can get Fairley to add some depth, I'd be good with Treadwell at 12 and a DT in the 2nd. Since the Draft is so DT heavy, there will be great value even at this pick.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News