- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Every team's worst pick in the 2017 NFL Draft (247 Sports)
Posted on 5/1/17 at 12:00 pm to TideSaint
Posted on 5/1/17 at 12:00 pm to TideSaint
This just points out to me that we had a great draft.
Im cool with that. Drafting someone at 32 who ends up being a steady figure on the line is good imo
not exactly our fault
quote:
The Wisconsin lineman could turn out to be a steady figure on the Saints’ offensive line
Im cool with that. Drafting someone at 32 who ends up being a steady figure on the line is good imo
quote:
but New Orleans had their sights set on another target: Reuben Foster. The 49ers traded ahead of the Saints and they were forced to select an offensive lineman instead of some much-needed defensive help.
not exactly our fault
0
Posted on 5/1/17 at 12:04 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
So, our worst pick is a solid player and projected long-term starter? I'll take that.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 12:08 pm to TideSaint
how can it be a worst pick if we made the best pick available??????????
they blame us for not picking a guy someone had already picked because someone traded up to take or targeted guy? that's just the most stupid thing ever
they blame us for not picking a guy someone had already picked because someone traded up to take or targeted guy? that's just the most stupid thing ever
Posted on 5/1/17 at 12:28 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
I'll just say we spent about 200 snaps with an eligible tackle, which is 12
5 per game.
That's considerable playing time so even if he doesn't start he will contribute and start next year.
I believe that also keeps our line intact for the two years after this when Unger is up in 2020.
5 per game.
That's considerable playing time so even if he doesn't start he will contribute and start next year.
I believe that also keeps our line intact for the two years after this when Unger is up in 2020.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 12:29 pm to TideSaint
So their reasoning for it being the worst pick is as follows:
Ramczyk might be awesome, but the Saints wanted a DE.
That's so stupid.
Ramczyk might be awesome, but the Saints wanted a DE.
That's so stupid.
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 5/1/17 at 12:40 pm to The Sad Banana
It's an Alabama 247 site, they are putting that simply because the saints didn't grab a Bama player
I would guess that every other team on there is probably a pick that they chose another player over a Bama player
I would guess that every other team on there is probably a pick that they chose another player over a Bama player
Posted on 5/1/17 at 1:01 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
It's an Alabama 247 site, they are putting that simply because the saints didn't grab a Bama player
No. It's not.
It shows up as an Alabama 247 site because that is who I pay my subscription through.
It's a national 247 article.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 2:07 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Still surprised Seattle traded within the division.
Given their solid defensive drafting and development, that should tell you more negatively how they saw Foster than anything else.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 2:52 pm to TideSaint
If that's our worst pick then we had a damn good draft
Posted on 5/1/17 at 4:24 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:'
Anal zone was easily our worst pick. That said, I hope he makes me eat those words.
Gross.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 9:56 pm to TideSaint
Ramdyk "n" Analzone may become the best position the Saints filled during the draft.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 10:45 pm to TideSaint
I honestly don't even pay attention to shite like this. Want to know how I know they never watch the Saints play? Simple. They think T is not a need for us when it is. It might not have been the biggest need for us but it definitely was one. Strief has also looked really awful at times and it could be getting worse. It's time to replace the old man. Could be this year or not but at least you have a guy now that should step in for him if anything happens. Don't understand the logic. So we got unlucky on Foster this guy becomes our worst pick because we went BPA? Is he implying he's not a need at all on our team? That's how I took it. I think the Saints did very well when it came to picking both BPA and needs at the same time.
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 10:48 pm
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News