- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Do Not Re-Sign Ingram ..sign Peterson or Rice
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:37 am
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:37 am
Is this a worthwhile gamble? Peterson/Rice have off field issues but on the field are light years better than Ingram. Is it worth taking a chance for one of these guys who would be looking to make a statement and prove they deserve a 2nd chance?
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 11:44 am
19
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:38 am to Merlin08
Just no
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:38 am to Merlin08
Wow.
Ingram can't be cut, firstly.
Ingram can't be cut, firstly.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:39 am to Merlin08
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:41 am to Merlin08
How can you cut a player not under contract?
How can you sign a player that is not a FA?
Solid fricking post Merlin
How can you sign a player that is not a FA?
Solid fricking post Merlin
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:43 am to Merlin08
why in the frick do people keep coming on here saying cut ingram? the motherfricker is a free fricking agent. jesus christ.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:43 am to Merlin08
quote:
Cut Ingram
Stopped there.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:48 am to Merlin08
It isn't about signing someone better than him IMO.
We have promising young back in Robinson who is under contract for ~$750k.
I'd rather have cheap running backs and spend the $3-5 million on the LOS.
We have promising young back in Robinson who is under contract for ~$750k.
I'd rather have cheap running backs and spend the $3-5 million on the LOS.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:51 am to Merlin08
Rice is better than Ingram on the field?
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:53 am to Merlin08
quote:
Merlin08
You better be using your magic to make some money appear for that shite to happen. Excalibur has a price tag you know, and it ain't cheap.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:54 am to Merlin08
this thread is very lol
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:54 am to Merlin08
When has Rice been good?
Not for a while.
Not for a while.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 11:57 am to BlacknGold
Summed that OP right up!
Posted on 3/3/15 at 12:05 pm to Midget Death Squad
Geez, Merlin, it must suck to know you cant come on this board and make a hypothetical statement without being put through the ringer by former NFL GM's who wouldn't take Peterson or Rice over Ingram.
If it were me, I wouldnt hesitate one bit to sign either one of those guys if the money and the opportunity were available to me.
If it were me, I wouldnt hesitate one bit to sign either one of those guys if the money and the opportunity were available to me.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 12:08 pm to chatchit42
quote:
NFL GM's who wouldn't take Peterson or Rice over Ingram.
Who said they wouldn't take Peterson > Ingram?
Ray Rice appears washed up though. He averaged 3.1 yards/carry in 2013 and now has this shitstorm around him.
quote:
If it were me, I wouldnt hesitate one bit to sign either one of those guys if the money and the opportunity were available to me.
Well, that is the point. The money isn't available and that means for ingram too. Petterson isn't a free agent and would be too expensive.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 3/3/15 at 12:15 pm to Merlin08
Light years better?
Peterson is not leaving Minn.
For anyone that actually watches the plays instead of listening for big ames would know Rice has been on the decline the past 2 years he played.
Ingram has been improving the past 2 years.
Peterson is not leaving Minn.
For anyone that actually watches the plays instead of listening for big ames would know Rice has been on the decline the past 2 years he played.
Ingram has been improving the past 2 years.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 12:22 pm to Merlin08
Peterson is old and will cost more than Ingram. Ray Rice is a lateral move, and obvious off the field issues.
Even if you could cut Ingram (which you can't), why would you for either after how Ingram played last season? Take the purple and gold glasses off, he is a nfl player now, not an alabama player.
Even if you could cut Ingram (which you can't), why would you for either after how Ingram played last season? Take the purple and gold glasses off, he is a nfl player now, not an alabama player.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 12:22 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
For anyone that actually watches the plays instead of listening for big ames would know Rice has been on the decline the past 2 years he played.
Well if you actually watched, Ray Rice ran like his old self last pre season and he was actually injured the 1 bad year he had. You keep watching thougH.
Posted on 3/3/15 at 12:41 pm to dj30
Ray Rice is a good buy low especially with his ability to catch the ball and make moves in the open field
Posted on 3/3/15 at 12:42 pm to TigerBait1127
No, I think a good NFL GM would first fix their atrocious offensive line so that Peterson/Rice(lol)/Ingram have a hole to run through.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News