- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Calm down! We got less for Graham
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:11 pm
Cooks is way overrated . We got raped in the graham trade , not this one
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:12 pm to xraytech
We got a quality starter at a position of need for Graham. So you're wrong there.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:12 pm to xraytech
We got a starting C, so no we didn't.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:12 pm to xraytech
For Graham we got
#31 pick
Max Unger
And gave up a 4th
I'd much rather that trade
#31 pick
Max Unger
And gave up a 4th
I'd much rather that trade
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:13 pm to xraytech
whats more valuable
unger or a 3rd
i'm going with unger
unger or a 3rd
i'm going with unger
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:13 pm to xraytech
A lot of fail in your post, OP. We got a pro-bowl center and a first round pick for Graham. Here, we got the last pick of the first round.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:21 pm to TigerBait1127
And we got rid of his dumbass contract. Cooks' contract was favorable as frick. So no, no we didn't get less for Graham at all. Not that that has any bearing on whether we got equal value for Cooks in this trade or not anyway.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:25 pm to xraytech
Graham was an over priced pussy too. Unger filled a HUGE need.
This post was edited on 3/10/17 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:39 pm to TigerLunatik
Would take Unger for Graham straight up. That was a great deal!!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News