Started By
Message

re: A Featured RB

Posted on 10/27/14 at 11:32 am to
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30110 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 11:32 am to
We do that FB dive way too often. Last year, it caught teams off guard, but we do it every 3rd and short it seems.
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14776 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Give me Robinson as the featured back 5.2 ypc with double Ingram's carries


I agree. I think Robinson would have equaled or surpassed Ingram's production last night had the roles been reversed. He's bigger, quicker, and faster.

Especially now that Lorig is healthy, and we saw some nice blocks last night he made for Ingram.

I did enjoy Ingram's game last night. But considering it's only Ingram's 2nd 100 yard game in 5 years, and that it came against the league's worst rush defense (giving up 153 ypg), it's not enough to convince me Robinson couldn't have been more productive. Ingram will never be a home run threat (longest run this year: 28 yds), but Robinson has the potential (longest run: 69).
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

I agree. I think Robinson would have equaled or surpassed Ingram's production last night had the roles been reversed. He's bigger, quicker, and faster.



stick to eating and making gay artwork.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115738 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:10 pm to
Ouch, harsh.

But I don't agree with him. Ingram has been a different back since last year.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

But considering it's only Ingram's 2nd 100 yard game in 5 years


and his what 2nd or maybe 3rd game as a featured runner?

Green bay's running defense does suck, and ingram hit them for more yards than matt forte

jesus, is it really because this guy played for bama?
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14776 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

stick to eating and making gay artwork


Go play with David Duchovny's dick. The adults are talking.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:12 pm to
no, it's not. only an imbecile could watch that and dismiss what he did...worst defense, yeah and that's why he hit them for 174 yards
Posted by bamabenny
Member since Nov 2009
14649 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

jesus, is it really because this guy played for bama?


Do you really need to ask this?

The guy just ran for over 170 yards last night and people are still shitting on him.

It's fricking retarded.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Go play with David Duchovny's dick


sick burn. I bet it would be more interesting than your "work"



174 yards, hell robinson would've doubled that
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14776 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

that's why he hit them for 174 yards


Break out the champagne! Mark Ingram got 21 yards more than what the Packers give every single game!
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

But considering it's only Ingram's 2nd 100 yard game in 5 years,


I can think of 3 in the last year

Philly, Dallas, and last night
This post was edited on 10/27/14 at 1:16 pm
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:15 pm to
what would've impressed them? 300?

I guess he would have to do it against the best defense in the NFL, because 174 yard performances happen against top defenses so often
Posted by bamabenny
Member since Nov 2009
14649 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:18 pm to
I can't wait for Ingram to get out of New Orleans. He'll never be appreciated due to his connection with Bama. It's quite sad, really.

Guy is playing his arse off over the past year and continues to get shite on by a vocal minority of the Saints fanbase that can't separate NFL and NCAA fandom.
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14776 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

I guess he would have to do it against the best defense in the NFL


Neither did well against the 2nd best rushing defense in the NFL (Detroit), but Robinson averaged 8.7 ypc in that game while Ingram got 1.6.

Stop the Bama-LSU bias shite. Open your eyes and look at the numbers.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30110 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:20 pm to
Sometimes, I really hate this group that keep pushing the Khiry is better than Ingram stick.

Tampa Bay and Minnesota were home games against porous run defenses too, but 39 carries in those two games yieled a total 158 yards.

I even broke down each player's run and Ingram has vastly less yards for loss/0 yard carries than Khiry Robinson did, not even including the GB game.

Khiry had his fair shots against the currently: 17th and 23rd run defense and didn't even break 100. He barely even averaged 4.0ypc against them.

Cleveland
Mark Ingram: 11 carries - 83 yards
Khiry Robinson: 8 carries - 31 yards

Pretty even workload, but the Ingram fellow doubled that Khiry guy's yardage.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

21 yards more than what the Packers give every single game



and 52 more than any other rb has had against the packers (matt forte 122 yards)

only 3 backs have topped 100 yards against the packers

forte
lynch
ingram

stop sniffing the paint
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30110 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Neither did well against the 2nd best rushing defense in the NFL (Detroit), but Robinson averaged 8.7 ypc in that game while Ingram got 1.6.

Stop the Bama-LSU bias shite. Open your eyes and look at the numbers.



haha really, because 3 carries is such a good indicator of how good he'd be carrying it 15 more times. One outlier run skews it all up.
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75855 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

I agree. I think Robinson would have equaled or surpassed Ingram's production last night had the roles been reversed. He's bigger, quicker, and faster. Especially now that Lorig is healthy, and we saw some nice blocks last night he made for Ingram. I did enjoy Ingram's game last night. But considering it's only Ingram's 2nd 100 yard game in 5 years, and that it came against the league's worst rush defense (giving up 153 ypg), it's not enough to convince me Robinson couldn't have been more productive. Ingram will never be a home run threat (longest run this year: 28 yds), but Robinson has the potential (longest run: 69).


Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:23 pm to
oh you mean the game where ingram returned from a broken hand and had 10 carries to robinson's 3...most people don't bother mentioning a great YPC when you get 3
quote:


Stop the Bama-LSU bias shite

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, otherwise you'd just be an imbecile
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14776 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Sometimes, I really hate this group that keep pushing the Khiry is better than Ingram stick.


It's schtick.

But besides the point, you must hate bigger, faster, stronger runners who can actually break long runs.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram