- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/20/17 at 8:54 am to saints5021
every time i play 2k17 i start from the preseason so i can keep the roster in tact but move those scrubs hill and moore to minimum contracts.
that's how bad it looks
that's how bad it looks
Posted on 1/20/17 at 11:58 am to Machine
Said it then, will repeat it now: Signing a 4 ppg scorer to a contract worth NFL QB money was effing retarded.
Posted on 1/21/17 at 8:03 am to cgrand
quote:
Demps is really awful at valuing and evaluating the SF position
quote:
demps has a poor track record of bringing in low-usage players and expecting similar/better production at much higher usage rates
i would (and did) argue that Hill was never going to be the SF everyone wanted. he was always more of a 4 on offense. the hope was maybe he could develop into a better shooter and playmaker. but he's not a "3." to me, the failure of the Hill signing (so far) is that i dont think he can defend well enough at the 4.
i think Demps just doesnt know how to build a roster that fits together. Jester needs to send him our Z Graph work
quote:
the guy I wanted Ian Clark on the minimum
he's finally adapted
not sure how Clark (6'3" 175lbs w/ no playmaking skills) factors into a wing discussion. he's a small SG. now Clark for a minimum v Galloway or even Moore? that's more interesting.
This post was edited on 1/21/17 at 8:09 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News