Should we take take Jeremy Lamb's contract

No. Too much salary for us to take on without giving any back out. Would hurt us in Free Agency.

Although, limiting the amount of damage Dell can do in FA wouldn't be the worst thing.

I'd do it. You get a pick, so that's one less FA to sign.
Wr aren't paying someone the max anyway.

I'd rather the 22ND pick than a minimum salary FA.

quote:

---

The move we can make is to be patient, use our draft picks, develop talent, make smart moves in free agency to acquire tradable assets, and build the team the right way.

---

But but the young veterans plan....

If it gives us the chance to grab a 3+D SF like Taurean Prince at 22, then I would jump at it.

quote:

---

 would counter that limiting dell-damage would be the best thing. sign me up

---

I'm all for eliminating his ability to throw $100M at Harrison Barnes

I have to say no to this. I'd love to have another 1st, but it'd be like paying 20M for the 20th pick in the draft. Thats just not smart. Lamb has gotten worse every year and is too small to play SF. We already have a better version of him im Poindexter and we'd still have to add a wing.

I would think about Hawes though. He can fill Anderson's role and is almost 10M cheaper than Lamb. Then we can look to dump Asik or Ajincia. So he's good insurance. Still alot of money though..

quote:

---

The move we can make is to be patient, use our draft picks, develop talent, make smart moves in free agency to acquire tradable assets, and build the team the right way.

---

You mean like Noel, a top 10 pick, and cap space > Jrue Holiday?

You mean the same noel that's likely going to get traded again?

It was 3 years ago get over it