Started By
Message

Eric Gordon 0 for 6 in shooting last night.

Posted on 11/5/14 at 8:50 am
Posted by LesTiger
Hammond
Member since Apr 2007
553 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 8:50 am
When will he either remember how to shoot or get sat down for someone who can actually contribute? He shooting around 21% on fg for the year so far. What a waste of money. No wonder we can't trade a 6'2" shooting guard who can't score but has a max contract. I guess hindsight is 20/20 on this one. Just have to hope he turns it around soon.
Posted by tbrig3211
New Orleans
Member since May 2006
2601 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 9:00 am to
6'4"
Posted by Peliclown
Member since Nov 2013
2480 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 9:02 am to
6'3
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 9:03 am to
He's sucked bad on offense but he's been very good defensively.

I'll give him credit for that.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38832 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Posted by LosLobos111 He's sucked bad on offense but he's been very good defensively. I'll give him credit for that.


can't put a price on that
Oh wait...yes you can
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15359 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 9:15 am to
Oh wait...
Posted by Hazelnut
Member since May 2011
16433 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:15 am to
In before danman
This post was edited on 11/5/14 at 10:15 am
Posted by KindaRaw
Member since Jun 2014
3963 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:16 am to
That 14 mil guarantees offense, but it just isn't there ... I feel like he'd be better coming off the bench with our rotations.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61536 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:17 am to
danman likes Gordon now #StockholmSyndrome
Posted by suavecito80
Member since Apr 2014
2871 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:58 am to
quote:

That 14 mil guarantees offense, but it just isn't there ... I feel like he'd be better coming off the bench with our rotations.


They have to try something. I can't see this team winning games against good teams consistently with your two guard putting up goose eggs night in and night out.
Posted by drake20
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
13123 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 1:09 pm to
he averaged 15 PPG last season pretty efficiently.

...he's just going through a bad slump, and is now anxious to get the shots falling.

the defensive effort is encouraging.

If he gets back to last season's form offensively, and Ryno and Jrue finish shaking off the rust, it's gonna be a good team
Posted by kysportsman
Kentucky
Member since Mar 2012
1323 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:09 pm to
only 4 games and the only way to go is up. Shooting 20%

PPG APG RPG PER
5.8 0.8 3.5 -0.51


nearly 15 million per season
Posted by tgr4ever
Gwinnett, baw
Member since Jul 2011
16214 posts
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

nearly 15 million per season
We know
Posted by Hammond Tiger Fan
Hammond
Member since Oct 2007
16218 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 8:19 am to
I'm not worried about EG at all. He started off the season in a shooting slump, which will not last very long IMO. It's more of a confidence thing than anything else. Once he hits a few his rhythm and confidence will be back. The reason why I'm not worried about him is because of what I'm seeing from him on the defensive side. He's putting forth a lot of effort and in basketball if you want to see if a player's heart is in the game you look at the effort the player is putting forth defensively. I'm actually surprised by his effort defensively. His offensive game will come around soon enough. We're only 4 games into the season. If he's still putting up poor offensive numbers around game 20, then I'll start to worry.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34905 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 8:21 am to
2 million dollars per made shot is not a good ratio so far
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61536 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 8:24 am to
quote:

I'm actually surprised by his effort defensively.


Yeah, this really shouldn't be overlooked. If EG gets his mojo back and Tyreke starts hitting 3s, "do we need a SF more than Gordon?" might become a legit question. I think the answer is still yes, but you still might ask it which is unexpected.

He averaged 15 points a game last year, if he hits that vs. Dallas we win, vs. Memphis we lose by 1 instead of 12, but the fact that he's producing would have changed the whole dynamic too and we could be sitting at 4-0 if Gordon wasn't slumping.
This post was edited on 11/6/14 at 8:25 am
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38832 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 8:59 am to
this is a good summary of the situation

LINK

quote:

Gordon's massive contract makes this decision tougher than other similar situations, but Monty is paid big dollars to make these types of decisions. Inserting Rivers into the starting lineup would require Monty to stagger lineups so that there is a ball handler on the court with Gordon because he is just too careless with the ball while dribbling. I propose that at a minimum, the Pels give Rivers 28 minutes (up from his 22 minute per game average) and drop Gordon to 20-22 minutes per game (down from his 32.8!) until he starts showing some semblance of the NBA player formerly known as Eric Gordon.


this is all, for better or worse, on monty. he didnt ask for his highest paid player to struggle, but now its up to him to do something to make it better. leaving the situation as is (starting EG/playing him 30 mins) with a "let him shoot his way out" mentality is a failure of leadership in my view. i hope they are working on solutions
Posted by Hammond Tiger Fan
Hammond
Member since Oct 2007
16218 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 9:07 am to
quote:

this is all, for better or worse, on monty. he didnt ask for his highest paid player to struggle, but now its up to him to do something to make it better. leaving the situation as is (starting EG/playing him 30 mins) with a "let him shoot his way out" mentality is a failure of leadership in my view. i hope they are working on solutions


I understand what you're saying, but EG has been very strong defensively which is the only reason why I would be against reducing his minutes. Even with his offensive struggles, he is a better option than Rivers b/c of the great defense he's been play thus far. Like I said in my previous post, give him a little more time and his offensive game will come around. We are only 4 games into the season. Just b/c he's in a slump early that's not a reason to reduce his minutes yet especially when he's putting forth great effort on the defensive end.
This post was edited on 11/6/14 at 9:09 am
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 9:22 am to
That part of that article is the definition of over reaction.

Eric Gordon (13.2) has a lower career TO rate than both Evans (14) and Holiday (17). Those rates were basically the same last year. And Rivers was only slightly better than Gordon.

The fact is the team doesn't turn it over much because they don't pass it much. That and OREB allow them to overcome poor shooting and a shitty scheme

Gordon is off right now, but acting like he is a TO machine is a fiction. Maybe he doesn't turn it around, but there are thousands of minutes that say we should be more worried about Holiday than Gordon
This post was edited on 11/6/14 at 9:23 am
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61536 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 9:35 am to


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram