- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dyson Stans
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:43 pm to Solo
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:43 pm to Solo
He's way over thinking and is a liability on offense. One play tonight he dribbled down the left side of the lane and instead of taking runner or layup he looked to pass the ball five feet away. It ended up right in the defender's hands that slid over knowing Dyson wouldnt shoot.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:43 pm to Solo
Dyson is the same age right now as sophomore Herb in college.
The idea of cutting bait with the guy who just turned 21 13 days ago is pretty silly.
quote:Certainly
It’s imperative that when you draft someone who doesn’t work out that you cut bait and move on
The idea of cutting bait with the guy who just turned 21 13 days ago is pretty silly.
quote:This is not true.
ETA: there are none
quote:In fairness, giving up on a young player less than 2 years into his career isn't a plan either.
This past deadline he prob had some value, what is his value now? Let me answer that, it’s fricking no value. It’s a tough business. “Hope is it a plan.”
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:44 pm to shel311
This board is pretty ridiculous. You don’t give up on a guy who’s 21 years old and elite on one side of the ball.
His offense is nearly as bad as his defense is good, but you’ve gotta get him minutes in order to at least get him to below average on the offensive side.
His offense is nearly as bad as his defense is good, but you’ve gotta get him minutes in order to at least get him to below average on the offensive side.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:47 pm to SouthMSReb
quote:
His offense is nearly as bad as his defense is good, but you’ve gotta get him minutes in order to at least get him to below average on the offensive side.
Sure but not if those minutes are costing us games and playoff seeding. At the end of the day its more important to position this team for success than to give developmental minutes to Dyson. I love Hawkins too but if hes costing us games down the stretch you have to sit him.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 8:41 pm to shel311
Most of the negative posters in here would've hated Herb his first two seasons, except we weren't good enough back then for anyone to complain.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 8:53 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Most of the negative posters in here would've hated Herb his first two seasons, except we weren't good enough back then for anyone to complain.
At the moment...I'm just tryin' to stay quiet on Dyson...& let folks badmouth him all they want...He's already our 2nd best defensive player...and he's a mile ahead of our 3rd best defender. He's be here...when some of our other current (rotation) players are long gone. Some will be traded (if possible) & some will probably just be allowed to "walk".
Dyson's offense will get better...not much way for it NOT to do so. He's a "keeper"...and we'll ALL be glad we have him...before too much longer.
This post was edited on 3/30/24 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 3/30/24 at 9:31 pm to Townedrunkard
Year 1: 42/31/65
Year 2: 44/29/64
He’s a guard. The receipts have already been kept amigo.
Year 2: 44/29/64
He’s a guard. The receipts have already been kept amigo.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 2:03 am to Solo
Dyson has a ton of offensive skill and will be fine shot wise. It’s all a confidence thing for him, he just needs time on task. Not slightly worried about him
Posted on 3/31/24 at 2:12 am to spaghettioeauxs
quote:
Dyson has a ton of offensive skill
Does he? What is he genuinely good at on offense?? He doesn’t shoot it well from deep, has no midrange game and honestly isn’t the best finisher. Honestly his best attribute on offense is that hes a decent offensive rebounder.
Again amazing defensive player but also currently horrible offensive player.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 2:20 am to spaghettioeauxs
Man, I hope you guys are right on Dyson. I just don't see it. He looks mechanical and stiff on offense, handling the ball, shooting. I don't recall a guy who looked this uncomfortable on offense becoming a good all around player. When I think where the Pels might be right now if we'd just taken Jalen Williams instead of Dyson...
Posted on 3/31/24 at 8:12 am to New City Champ
quote:
Man, I hope you guys are right on Dyson. I just don't see it.
I don’t think Dyson is some lost cause. He has real ability on the defense end. That being said I’m not sure when his offense will come around and if the pels will be patient enough for it to come around. Basically, Im not sure Dyson’s timeline will matchup with what Pels need going forward.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:01 am to Pels_Yaz
Dyson is one of the three possible trade pieces we could use this summer (along with CJ and BI). I could see a Walker Kessler trade, for example.
But I definitely don't want to trade Dyson. I think that he's going to end up as a DPOY.
But I definitely don't want to trade Dyson. I think that he's going to end up as a DPOY.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:04 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Dyson is one of the three possible trade pieces we could use this summer (along with CJ and BI). I could see a Walker Kessler trade, for example. But I definitely don't want to trade Dyson. I think that he's going to end up as a DPOY.
I agree with this. I think eventually he’ll be traded. I also agree he has DPOY potential but unfortunately I’m not sure he’ll be with the pels when he gets close to that level.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:18 am to Solo
quote:
One way players on good teams?
Why so much focus on a 2nd year player?
CJ McCollum has been a one way player for his entire career. Until very recently, Ingram and Zion were one way players. A year and half ago, Herb Jones was no better offensively than Dyson is now. Now they are the core of 50 win team.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 9:42 am to mhasen1
quote:
A year and half ago, Herb Jones was no better offensively than Dyson is now.
I keep hearing this but I’m not sure this is really accurate statistically and just the way they play offensively. Herb has averaged at least over 9 points since his rookie year, has statistically been a better shooter than Dyson since his rookie year and when it comes to off ball movements and transition offense even as a rookie Herb was really good at this. But most of all there’s the confidence issue which Herb never had issues with make or miss. Meanwhile you can tell Dyson has severe confidence issues on the offensive end in his second year.
Again I love Dyson’s defensive upside but his offensive issues are a lot worse than Herb’s were even in his rookie year.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 11:34 am to mhasen1
quote:Day 1 rookie Herb was much much better offensively than year 2 Dyson.
A year and half ago, Herb Jones was no better offensively than Dyson is now
Posted on 3/31/24 at 12:02 pm to Pels_Yaz
Go watch Dyson’s Squadron highlights. He looked fluid and confident knowing he was playing scrubs and he abused them. Even took a deep jab step 3 he buried. He will be great on both ends. Josh Giddey is kind of his Australian comparison/similar body types and Giddey is a year ahead and finally starting to make a real contribution on offense. He looks assertive and unstoppable running the point at 6’8. And Giddey will never be close to the defender Dyson already is
Posted on 3/31/24 at 12:05 pm to Pels_Yaz
Herb was also a 4 year starter at Bama, played meaningful games in the SEC, and is 25 years old. It’s apples and oranges to compare a 19 yo rookie and a 23 yo rookie
Posted on 3/31/24 at 12:31 pm to spaghettioeauxs
quote:
Go watch Dyson’s Squadron highlights. He looked fluid and confident knowing he was playing scrubs and he abused them. Even took a deep jab step 3 he buried. He will be great on both ends.
I did and honestly the gleague is bad. Saying he will be “great” on BOTH ends is unrealistic. He needs to be at least be close to average offensively.
Giddey again as a rookie was a much better passer and interior player than Dyson was. And now Giddey is making 3s. I’ll say this again, currently there is nothing Dyson does well offensively.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 12:33 pm to spaghettioeauxs
quote:
Herb was also a 4 year starter at Bama, played meaningful games in the SEC, and is 25 years old. It’s apples and oranges to compare a 19 yo rookie and a 23 yo rookie
Yeah but the reality is they’re both young rookies in the NBA and are trying to progress on a competitive playoff team. The question becomes are the pelicans going to wait 4-5 years until Dyson becomes competent on offense? Historically, that wont happen and he’ll get traded. I think Dyson will figure it out offensively it just wont be with the Pels.
This post was edited on 3/31/24 at 12:36 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News