Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Anyone know much about Takamine guitars?

Posted on 12/3/16 at 2:21 pm
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27969 posts
Posted on 12/3/16 at 2:21 pm
I picked up a N-10 a couple of days ago. Looks to be a 96 model,mae in Japan,cedar top,mahogany back and sides.Top and back are solid,but what about the sides? I am pretty sure they are solid,but I don't know for sure.
It has a pretty bad scratch on the top,but the back and sides are about perfect.
It's a great sounding and playing guitar, I feel like I got a good deal at 250 bucks.
It's the first Takamine I have ever owned,and I don't know much about them.
Posted by TheFretShack
Member since Oct 2015
1240 posts
Posted on 12/3/16 at 6:51 pm to
The Japanese-made Takamines are their flagship models and they are very good instruments. Good materials and craftsmanship, great sounding and great players. You got a great bang for your 250 bucks.

Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27969 posts
Posted on 12/3/16 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

The Japanese-made Takamines are their flagship models and they are very good instruments. Good materials and craftsmanship, great sounding and great players. You got a great bang for your 250 bucks


Thanks for replying,it also has the hardshell takamine case, with takamine molded in.
The tuners are gold plated,with the pink turtouise shell graspers.

It has a dark ivory inlay around the sound hole too,and I have not seen this on another 6 string.

Are the sides solid?
This post was edited on 12/3/16 at 8:09 pm
Posted by TheFretShack
Member since Oct 2015
1240 posts
Posted on 12/3/16 at 10:11 pm to
I don't know if the sides and/or back on that guitar or MIJ Taks in general are solid or laminate. If that's a concern for you, keep in mind debates over the alleged pros/cons of solid versus laminate sides and backs on acoustics are inevitably very, very subjective and there is basically no definitive or consensus answer as to one or the other being "better," let alone "best."

I'd instead tell you if you like the way the guitar sounds and plays, you've won. If you found it without breaking the bank, as you apparently have, you're an even bigger winner.
Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 5:21 am to
I see a lot of Artists playing them.Sounds like you got a good deal.

You can tell by the weight and the sound how good of a Takamine it is.

I doubt they use Mahogany on their cheaper models.

I love the look of Cedar tops.

Have fun .
This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 5:26 am
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27969 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 10:46 am to
quote:

I don't know if the sides and/or back on that guitar or MIJ Taks in general are solid or laminate. If that's a concern for you, keep in mind debates over the alleged pros/cons of solid versus laminate sides and backs on acoustics are inevitably very, very subjective and there is basically no definitive or consensus answer as to one or the other being "better," let alone "best."


I agree,that a well built laminate guitar,can sound as great as a solid one.
One drawback to them though,is that it can be harder to get them repaired.
I have a 12 string red label Yamaha,that sounds really great,but I would like to have the neck reset to improve the action. Nobody wants to do that though,because it is a laminate guitar,and the process will likely cause the wood layers to come apart. Disappointing for me,because it sounds so great, I would really like to be able to use it more.
I would rather avoid that situation again.I am the type of guy that likes things that can be repaired,whether it's a gun,a car or a guitar. I prefer things that are worth fixing,because these are the ones that will still be around 100 years from now.
Posted by Big_Slim
Mogadishu
Member since Apr 2016
3977 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 12:47 pm to
It was the first guitar I ever got, grandpa gave one to me when I was about 10. A black single cutaway acoustic, those things are sexy as hell, I don't think they sound quite as good as a Taylor or a Martin but they are still great guitars
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34319 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 12:57 pm to
Depends, really. I've heard some Martins and Taylors that sound like mexibuilt trash. If you spend $3000 on either, of course it will sound great. Under $1000 and your money is probably best spent elsewhere.
Posted by Big_Slim
Mogadishu
Member since Apr 2016
3977 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 1:01 pm to
Ah I gotcha, I've only ever played my friends or relatives who shelled out bigly for theirs and they are fun to play. For that kind of money though I would much rather a top of the line electric and some kickass amp, those acoustics are expensive as frick
Posted by TheFretShack
Member since Oct 2015
1240 posts
Posted on 12/4/16 at 1:54 pm to
I agree,that a well built laminate guitar,can sound as great as a solid one. One drawback to them though,is that it can be harder to get them repaired. I have a 12 string red label Yamaha,that sounds really great,but I would like to have the neck reset to improve the action. Nobody wants to do that though,because it is a laminate guitar,and the process will likely cause the wood layers to come apart. Disappointing for me,because it sounds so great, I would really like to be able to use it more. I would rather avoid that situation again.I am the type of guy that likes things that can be repaired,whether it's a gun,a car or a guitar. I prefer things that are worth fixing,because these are the ones that will still be around 100 years from now.

I'd suspect nobody's willing to do the neck reset not so much over the laminates (you can reset them), but more likely because a pro neck reset and the possible associated/complimenting tasks the job entails costs more than a clean and perfectly functional Yamaha red label 12-string on the used/vintage market. I wouldn't take the job either. Unless there is some compelling heirloom/sentimental value tied to your guitar, I'd tell you to buy another like it on eBay or Reverb as well before you paid me for a reset. It just makes more sense.

Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27969 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 10:04 am to
I understand that part too,and all the more reason to pretty much only keep solid guitars. They tend to have more value,and are more worth fixing.
This is a great playing and sounding guitar,but I don't mind trading it off.I already have too many instruments, I would prefer to keep only the really good ones,that will hold value.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79221 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 11:14 am to
I haven't been as guitar obsessed in recent years, but when I was, Takamine was a workhorse guitar. I always saw them being used by competent guitarists who for whatever reason didn't want to buy or gig with Martin/Taylor/etc. Think decent bar musicians or church band leaders, folks like that.

Sounds like you got a great deal. Plus it's got a scratch already, so you can use the hell out of it and not feel guilty.
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12281 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 5:20 pm to
I have a 1977 f-360s "lawsuit guitar" that was my dads and that I learned to play on. I have Martins and Taylor's, but the Tak plays and sounds as good as any of them.

I also purchased a 1977 12 string that I love.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27969 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 10:59 am to
Yep, that's a good point,but it's gotten to a point where I can't keep anything else,unless it's really exceptional.
Considering giving some away right now,like that Yamaha 12 string. I have a neighbor who only plays 1st position chords anyway,so it might be a good guitar for him.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27969 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 11:02 am to
Don't know if I would say that this one sounds as good as a great martin,but the neck and action are as good as anything I've ever seen.
I don't come across many guitars that I don't feel a need to make it better. I don't want to change this one a bit.
Posted by TheFretShack
Member since Oct 2015
1240 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 12:34 pm to
Cedar tops are typically mellow, lacking the treble and especially the "boom" of spruce. So yes, that Tak is a MUCH different beast than the typical Martin.

Cedar tends to have a full and resonant midrange and a gorgeous "bloom" to individual notes. Cedars really shine in fingerpicking more than plectrums for my ears and tastes. If you typically use a pick, put it aside and see if you hear what I'm talking about.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27969 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 2:59 am to
I use a thumb pick and fingers, yeah, it's about perfect for that.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19154 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 9:46 am to
"Everybody told me you can't get far with $37 and a Jap guitar"



Actually, I think their older stuff (assembled in Japan) was a really good deal for the $. Sounds like you found a steal.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram